Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:13:07 -0400
Message-ID: <4765b108$0$5286$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>
> Really, I guess concurrency avaids whatever database you use.
>
> I guess doing a SELECT ... FROM ... on a Monday and then using that key
> on a look up on Wednesday without an imutable key does not cause you any
> problems.
>
> What is this miraculus database called? Perhaps we should stop using all
> the commerical ones immediately.
>
> PS.. I went to see the Peter Pan pantomine yesterday; so much reminds me
> of your content....
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:13:07 -0400
Message-ID: <4765b108$0$5286$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
Tony Rogerson wrote:
>> Since Roy and I both do our things in the real world of business and >> commerce, I can only assume you must confine yourself to a desk in a >> classroom where real world issues never occur or enter the frame. >> Otherwise, I can make no sense whatsoever of what you wrote.
>
> Really, I guess concurrency avaids whatever database you use.
>
> I guess doing a SELECT ... FROM ... on a Monday and then using that key
> on a look up on Wednesday without an imutable key does not cause you any
> problems.
>
> What is this miraculus database called? Perhaps we should stop using all
> the commerical ones immediately.
>
> PS.. I went to see the Peter Pan pantomine yesterday; so much reminds me
> of your content....
And a long overdue Plonk! Received on Mon Dec 17 2007 - 00:13:07 CET