Re: One-To-One Relationships
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 05:00:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <24c0938f-b1bf-41bd-9dbe-9a895323c103_at_d27g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
On 3 dec, 05:26, "V.J. Kumar" <vjkm..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Jan Hidders <hidd..._at_gmail.com> wrote innews:356a41b2-62b0-4106-942f-5670b998435e_at_p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
> > On 2 dec, 05:37, "V.J. Kumar" <vjkm..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Jan Hidders <hidd..._at_gmail.com> wrote
> >> innews:7114bf62-b7a6-4b8b-a515-dafc0f24fe62_at_l16g2000hsf.googlegroups.c
> >> om:
>
> >> > Ah, yes, and as we all know, if two concepts have overlap then they
> >> > are actually the same. *sigh* The distinction between entities /
> >> > relationships, domain objects / predicates is pretty
> >> > well-established in linguistics, philosophy and logic. First-order
> >> > logic, you may have heard of it, separates them even strictly.
>
> >> Is that so ? What is 'entity' and 'domain object' in the first order
> >> logic ?
>
> > In FOL a domain object is an object in the domain. An element of the
> > domain of discourse, if you prefer that terminology.
>
> None of the introductory or otherwise math logic books uses this kind
> terminology ('entity', 'domain objects').
- Jan Hidders