Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:40:33 -0400
Message-ID: <47652ad5$0$5287$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>
> like
>
>
> that
>
>
> Sure, if you'll do the same for me.
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:40:33 -0400
Message-ID: <47652ad5$0$5287$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
David Cressey wrote:
> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:4763df91$0$5290$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net...
>
>>>If you read MS Access documentation, you'll note that they use terms
>
> like
>
>>>"Record" and "Field" instead of terms like "Row" and "Column". That's >>>enough to get you tried for heresy in here. It's one of the few things
>
> that
>
>>>Bob Badour and Joe Celko agree on. >> >>I suggest you let Bob speak to what he agrees on. Jet is a file >>processor and MS Access is an end-user reporting tool. They can call >>things whatever the hell they want. None of it is relevant to data >>management.
>
> Sure, if you'll do the same for me.
Since when have I ever put words in your mouth or spoken for you? Received on Sun Dec 16 2007 - 14:40:33 CET