Re: One-To-One Relationships

From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 10:46:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <18f4d054-aa71-4376-9217-e915c502a10e_at_s36g2000prg.googlegroups.com>


On 2 déc, 16:04, "David Cressey" <cresse..._at_verizon.net> wrote:
> "Cimode" <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:cf6d9f49-1d6a-401a-8cba-4c30ee839d84_at_j44g2000hsj.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On 30 nov, 21:44, paul c <toledobythe..._at_ooyah.ac> wrote:
> > > David Cressey wrote:
>
> > > ...
>
> > > > But it you are expressing the same concept using tables, you now have
> to
> > > > put a third table in between the students table and the courses table.
> > > > Then, most of the time, you have to explain why a third table is
> necessary.
> > > > ...
>
> > > Doesn't matter whether a design is good or bad, explaining it is often
> > > harder than making it. Sometimes this is because too many tools (you
> > > can call them concepts if you like) get in the way and you spend all
> > > your time explaining them or their presentation instead of the original
> > > rationale.
>
> > Well put...
>
> > Complex, visually invading and overcrowded design GUI's facilitate the
> > subjective projection of anthropomorphic bias onto the world of binary
> > logic. I believe that the best tool for not getting distracted when
> > designing and sticking to logical objective design is indeed Notepad
> > like...
>
> ER is not a design tool. It's an analysis tool.
In this case, what difference does it make ?
> > Regards...
Received on Sun Dec 02 2007 - 19:46:05 CET

Original text of this message