comp.databases.theory: by date

Saturday, 1 December 2007
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Bob Badour
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Bob Badour
- Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David BL
- Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David BL
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information David BL
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David BL
- Re: One-To-One Relationships vldm10
- MI5 Persecution: BBC Newscasters Spying on my Home (537) MI5Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey
- MI5 Persecution: How to Identify the Persecutors (2008) MI5Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey
- MI5 Persecution: Browse the Website (3479) MI5Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- MI5 Persecution: Comparing the MI5 Persecution with German Final Solution (4950) MI5Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- MI5 Persecution: MI5 Waste Taxpayer Millions on Pointless Hate-Campaign (6421) MI5Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- MI5 Persecution: Four Years of MI5 Persecution Posts on Internet Newsgroups (7892) MI5Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG
- Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost
- Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG
- Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David BL
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode
- Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Marshall
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Bob Badour
Sunday, 2 December 2007
- Re: One-To-One Relationships V.J. Kumar
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information Jan Hidders
- Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG
- Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG
- plz normalize this table for me M.Shariq
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders
- Re: plz normalize this table for me Jan Hidders
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Bob Badour
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Bob Badour
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Bob Badour
- Re: plz normalize this table for me Bob Badour
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Bob Badour
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Marshall
- Re: One-To-One Relationships vldm10
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Bob Badour
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Marshall
Monday, 3 December 2007
- Help with Ms-Access Jeffrey Davis
- Re: Help with Ms-Access Jeffrey Davis
- Re: Help with Ms-Access Bob Badour
- Re: Help with Ms-Access Jeffrey Davis
- Re: Help with Ms-Access David Cressey
- Re: plz normalize this table for me David Cressey
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey
- Re: Help with Ms-Access Jeffrey Davis
- Re: Help with Ms-Access Bob Badour
- What is analysis? David Cressey
- Re: Help with Ms-Access Jeffrey Davis
- Re: Help with Ms-Access Bob Badour
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information David BL
- Re: Help with Ms-Access Jeffrey Davis
- Re: Help with Ms-Access Bob Badour
- Re: Help with Ms-Access Jeffrey Davis
- Re: One-To-One Relationships V.J. Kumar
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Marshall
- Re: What is analysis? Marshall
- Re: What is analysis? Jon Heggland
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders
- Re: What is analysis? David Cressey
- Re: Help with Ms-Access Bob Badour
- Re: What is analysis? Bob Badour
- Re: What is analysis? David Cressey
- Re: Help with Ms-Access David Cressey
- Re: What is analysis? David Cressey
- Re: What is analysis? Jon Heggland
- Re: What is analysis? David Cressey
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey
- Re: What is analysis? Bob Badour
- Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information Jan Hidders
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders
- Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost
- Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode
- Re: What is analysis? Jon Heggland
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jon Heggland
- Character string relation and functional dependencies Tegiri Nenashi
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Marshall
- Re: What is analysis? JOG
Tuesday, 4 December 2007
- Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost
- Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost
- Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: One-To-One Relationships vldm10
- Re: What is analysis? Bob Badour
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders
Wednesday, 5 December 2007
- Re: One-To-One Relationships vldm10
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Ruud de Koter
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Ruud de Koter
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders
- Re: What is analysis? Jon Heggland
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: One-To-One Relationships vldm10
- Re: What is analysis? David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Brian Selzer
- Re: What is analysis? TroyK
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey
- Re: What is analysis? David Cressey
- Re: What is analysis? David Cressey
- Re: What is analysis? David Cressey
- Re: What is analysis? TroyK
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey
Thursday, 6 December 2007
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David BL
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey
- indexes vs sorted files in range and equality search xareon_at_gmail.com
- Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour
- Re: indexes vs sorted files in range and equality search xareon_at_gmail.com
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Brian Selzer
- Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies rpost
- Re: What is analysis? rpost
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Tegiri Nenashi
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost
- Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost
- Re: What is analysis? rpost
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David BL
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David BL
- Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Jonathan Leffler
Friday, 7 December 2007
- Re: indexes vs sorted files in range and equality search Jonathan Leffler
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jonathan Leffler
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Tegiri Nenashi
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David BL
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Marshall
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Marshall
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Marshall
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland
- Re: One-To-One Relationships vldm10
- Re: One-To-One Relationships vldm10
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey
- Call for speakers - SQL Bits 2008; 1st March 2008 Birmingham UK Tony Rogerson
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David BL
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER TroyK
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Tegiri Nenashi
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER TroyK
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Ruud de Koter
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Ruud de Koter
- Valentina 3.5 Now Offers Custom Server Properties Lynn
- Re: Valentina 3.5 Now Offers Custom Server Properties Bob Badour
Saturday, 8 December 2007
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam
- OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER) mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam
- Re: OT editors mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam
- Re: OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER) David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David BL
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey
- Re: OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER) Roy Hann
- Re: OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER) David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER dawn
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
Sunday, 9 December 2007
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies V.J. Kumar
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Marshall
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Marshall
- Re: OT editors Frank Hamersley
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Jan Hidders
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Brian Selzer
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Brian Selzer
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Marshall
- Re: OT editors Roy Hann
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
Monday, 10 December 2007
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies V.J. Kumar
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Jan Hidders
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Jan Hidders
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Tegiri Nenashi
- Query independency from updates problem for relational databases silentser_at_gmail.com
Tuesday, 11 December 2007
- Anyone remember this book? Evan Keel
- CSR 2008: Last Call for Papers - deadline extended! (Moscow, Jun 08) Yuri Pritykin
- Re: Anyone remember this book? Bob Badour
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Anyone remember this book? Roy Hann
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies V.J. Kumar
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Marshall
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies David Cressey
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Tegiri Nenashi
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies V.J. Kumar
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Tegiri Nenashi
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Tegiri Nenashi
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies V.J. Kumar
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies V.J. Kumar
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Tegiri Nenashi
Wednesday, 12 December 2007
- Re: Anyone remember this book? -CELKO-
- Re: Anyone remember this book? Evan Keel
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Tegiri Nenashi
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost
- Re: OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER) rpost
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost
- Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99
Thursday, 13 December 2007
- Re: Query independency from updates problem for relational databases Jan Hidders
- Re: Anyone remember this book? Brian Selzer
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies V.J. Kumar
- Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...) d-42
- Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...) David Cressey
- Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...) David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? -CELKO-
- Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...) Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: Query independency from updates problem for relational databases silentser_at_gmail.com
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? mAsterdam
- Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...) jefftyzzer
- Re: Query independency from updates problem for relational databases Jan Hidders
Friday, 14 December 2007
- Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...) d-42
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Roy Hann
- Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Kira Yamato
- Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Kira Yamato
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- Re: Query independency from updates problem for relational databases silentser_at_gmail.com
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? -CELKO-
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Knowledgy
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Knowledgy
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? -CELKO-
- Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Ross Presser
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Ross Presser
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Ross Presser
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? -CELKO-
- Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? raylopez99
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? mAsterdam
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? David Portas
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? mAsterdam
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99
- Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. TroyK
Saturday, 15 December 2007
- Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...) -CELKO-
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? -CELKO-
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? -CELKO-
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? -CELKO-
- Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Kira Yamato
- Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Kira Yamato
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? Evan Keel
- Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Jan Hidders
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? mAsterdam
- Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Kira Yamato
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Roy Hann
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders
- Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Jan Hidders
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? Bob Badour
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? raylopez99
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? raylopez99
- Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? raylopez99
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? Jerry Gitomer
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? Bob Badour
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? Roy Hann
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? Hugo Kornelis
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Hugo Kornelis
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson
Sunday, 16 December 2007
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Brian Selzer
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson
- MI5-Persecution: How Could It Be True? (504) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? David Cressey
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? raylopez99
- MI5-Persecution: Why do you think MI5 are responsible? (2687) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- MI5-Persecution: Why would they be doing this to you, sir? (4870) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? David Cressey
- MI5-Persecution: .net Magazine Applauds my Website (7053) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- MI5-Persecution: BBC Newscasters Spying on my Home (9236) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- MI5-Persecution: How to Identify the Persecutors (11419) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- MI5-Persecution: Browse the Website (13602) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- MI5-Persecution: Comparing the MI5 Persecution with German Final Solution (15785) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- MI5-Persecution: MI5 Waste Taxpayer Millions on Pointless Hate-Campaign (17968) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- MI5-Persecution: Four Years of MI5 Persecution Posts on Internet Newsgroups (20151) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- MI5-Persecution: BBC Newscasters Lie & Deny Theyre Watching Me (22334) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- MI5-Persecution: Molestation during Travel (24517) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- MI5-Persecution: MI5 are Afraid to Admit Theyre Behind the Persecution (26700) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- MI5-Persecution: No Justice for the Victims of MI5 (28883) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99
- MI5-Persecution: MI5 Have Systematically Destroyed My Life (31066) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? Roy Hann
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Dr. Dweeb
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Dr. Dweeb
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Hugo Kornelis
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Hugo Kornelis
Monday, 17 December 2007
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? Hugo Kornelis
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Jonathan Leffler
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Brian Selzer
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? raylopez99
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? raylopez99
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? mAsterdam
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? raylopez99
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? Bob Badour
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? mAsterdam
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost
Tuesday, 18 December 2007
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Deadline approaching: Call for book chapters - Proposal Submission Deadline: Dec 31, 2007 Yanchang
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Brian Selzer
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Amazon's "Simple" Database JOG
- Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database David Cressey
- Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database Bob Badour
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour
- Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database Roy Hann
- Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database JOG
- Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database David Cressey
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Brian Selzer
- What is a "data sublanguage" David Cressey
- Re: What is a "data sublanguage" Kira Yamato
- Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database Tegiri Nenashi
- Re: What is a "data sublanguage" Roy Hann
- Wanna be a DBA? David Cressey
- Re: What is a "data sublanguage" Kira Yamato
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Kevin Kirkpatrick
- Re: What is a "data sublanguage" Bob Badour
- Re: Wanna be a DBA? Jason Lepack
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- Re: Wanna be a DBA? Bob Badour
Wednesday, 19 December 2007
- Re: Wanna be a DBA? Jerry Gitomer
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database Sampo Syreeni
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- Implementing Dataphor Providers in Visual Studio - Help! stevedtrm_at_hotmail.com
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Anith Sen
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost
Thursday, 20 December 2007
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? JOG
- which part of IM is this ? rpl
- Re: which part of IM is this ? Bob Badour
- Re: which part of IM is this ? rpl
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Jon Heggland
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer
- Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost
- Re: Implementing Dataphor Providers in Visual Studio - Help! Ed Prochak
- what are keys and surrogates? rpost
Friday, 21 December 2007
- Re: Implementing Dataphor Providers in Visual Studio - Help! stevedtrm
- Re: Implementing Dataphor Providers in Visual Studio - Help! jingleheimerschmitt_at_hotmail.com
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer
- Re: what are keys and surrogates? JOG
Saturday, 22 December 2007
- Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database Lon Stowell
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Frank Hamersley
- Re: Wanna be a DBA? Tony Rogerson
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? raylopez99
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? David Portas
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? tina
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Bob Badour
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Douglas J. Steele
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? tina
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Bob Badour
Sunday, 23 December 2007
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Frank Hamersley
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? David Cressey
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? raylopez99
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? raylopez99
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? David Cressey
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? mAsterdam
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? tina
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? tina
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Gene Wirchenko
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? raylopez99
Monday, 24 December 2007
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Tony Toews [MVP]
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Tony Toews [MVP]
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Tony Toews [MVP]
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David BL
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Bob Badour
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Bob Badour
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Tony Toews [MVP]
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David BL
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Sampo Syreeni
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? tina
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? tina
Tuesday, 25 December 2007
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? rpl
- Re: What is a "data sublanguage" Knowledgy
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Bob Badour
- schema help magawake
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Tony Toews [MVP]
- Re: schema help Rob
Wednesday, 26 December 2007
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David BL
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Tony Toews [MVP]
- Re: schema help magawake
- Re: schema help David BL
- M'I-5'Per secution Comparin g t he MI5 Persecut ion wit h German Fina l Soluti on mevfm_at_hotmail.com
- Re: schema help Cimode
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? rpl
- M`I'5-Perse cution ` M I5 W aste Taxp ayer M illions on Poi ntless Hate-Campaign ifmvem_at_hotmail.com
- M,I.5'P ersecution Fou r Years of M I5 Persec ution Po sts on Inte rnet Newsgro ups vmemfvm_at_hotmail.com
- M-I,5.Persecu tion - BB C Newsca sters Lie & Den y Theyre W atching Me fvfefv_at_hotmail.com
- M I`5 Persecuti on , Molestation during T ravel mfifefemi_at_hotmail.com
- Re: schema help Rob
- NULLs stevedtrm
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Sampo Syreeni
- SAP BASIS Tech Cons, Lionsville PA, 3-4 months ...URGENT REQUIREMENT... META SENSE SUPPORT
- Re: NULLs David Cressey
- Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG
- Re: NULLs Bob Badour
- Re: schema help Rob
- Re: NULLs Bob Badour
- A few questions about arxiv paper Tegiri Nenashi
Thursday, 27 December 2007
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David BL
- Re: NULLs stevedtrm
- Re: NULLs Bob Badour
- Re: schema help David BL
- creating ER diagrams magawake
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer
- Re: NULLs stevedtrm
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? rpl
- Re: NULLs Roy Hann
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? rpl
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- Re: schema help Rob
- Re: NULLs Marshall
- Re: NULLs Marshall
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? paul c
- Re: NULLs JOG
- Re: NULLs paul c
Friday, 28 December 2007
- Re: NULLs Hugo Kornelis
- Re: NULLs Hugo Kornelis
- Re: NULLs David BL
- Re: NULLs JOG
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas
- Re: NULLs David BL
- Re: NULLs Marshall
- What is an automorphism of a database instance? Kira Yamato
- Re: What is an automorphism of a database instance? Kira Yamato
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey
- Re: What is an automorphism of a database instance? Tegiri Nenashi
- Re: What is an automorphism of a database instance? Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? paul c
- Re: NULLs Hugo Kornelis
- Re: NULLs Hugo Kornelis
Saturday, 29 December 2007
- Re: NULLs Hugo Kornelis
- Re: NULLs mAsterdam
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David BL
- Re: NULLs David BL
- Re: What is an automorphism of a database instance? Kira Yamato
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer
- A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? raylopez99
- Re: NULLs JOG
- Re: NULLs Marshall
- Re: NULLs JOG
- Re: NULLs Bob Badour
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Sampo Syreeni
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? Marshall
Sunday, 30 December 2007
- Functional Dependency algorithm Jeff
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? raylopez99
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? Bob Badour
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? mAsterdam
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? raylopez99
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? Bob Badour
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? rpl
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? mAsterdam
- Re: NULLs Brian Selzer
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? Marshall
- Re: NULLs JOG
- Re: NULLs David Cressey
- Re: NULLs Brian Selzer
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? raylopez99
Monday, 31 December 2007
- Re: NULLs JOG
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? mAsterdam
- Re: NULLs Bob Badour
- Re: NULLs Bob Badour
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? Bob Badour
- some ado about nothing mAsterdam
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? JOG
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? Bob Badour
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? JOG
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David BL
- M`I 5-Per secution - Molestation durin g Trav el viemvmvfi_at_hotmail.com
- Re: NULLs Brian Selzer
- M,I-5 Pe rsecution ' MI 5 a re Afr aid to Adm it Theyr e Be hind th e Persecut ion mivmevie_at_yahoo.com
- Re: NULLs Brian Selzer
- M`I'5-Perse cution ` No J ustice f or the Vi ctims of M I5 eifmv_at_lycos.com
- M'I-5'Perse cution , MI5 Have Syste matically Destr oyed My Lif e vefvfmfv_at_bigfoot.com
- M`I,5`Pers ecution - Harass ment throu gh the Rad io fvfmev_at_gmail.com
- M`I 5.Persecution ` Three Years of MI 5 Persecut ion Faxe s mvmvfim_at_hotmail.com
- M.I,5`Persecu tion . MI5 Wan t Me to Send Yo u the se Faxes evmfe_at_yahoo.com
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? David Cressey
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? David Cressey
- M`I 5.Persecutio n ` MI 5 Insis t th at the se Faxes m ust Contin ue mimie_at_lycos.com
- M'I`5'Persec ution 2 2,544 + 83 7 = 23, 381 evfefivm_at_bigfoot.com
- Re: NULLs JOG
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? Bob Badour
- Re: NULLs Brian Selzer
- What Is Linux? Andrew.Skipper.group.com_at_gmail.com
- Scholarships for PhD study in Informatics_at_Edinburgh Don Sannella
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? David Cressey
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? David Cressey
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? David Cressey
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? raylopez99
- Re: NULLs Marshall
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? Tony Toews [MVP]
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? David Cressey

Last message date: Mon Dec 31 2007 - 20:31:36 CET
Archived on: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 22:50:24 CEST

709 messages sort by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ]
Nearby: [ About this archive ] [ Other mail archives ]