Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:50:22 -0400
Message-ID: <47786704$0$19865$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
JOG wrote:
> On Dec 31, 12:51 am, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>>raylopez99 wrote:
>>
>>>On Dec 30, 2:19 pm, mAsterdam <mAster..._at_vrijdag.org> wrote:
>>
>>>>raylopez99 wrote:
>>
>>>>>OK wise guy <g>, I kindly beseech thee to give me a simple schema that
>>>>>will do the following: "to declare a uniqueness constraint as a
>>>>>foreign key reference" that allows me to do the following:
>>
>>>>Where did you get the quoted part? It is unclear.
>>
>>>I think that was Bob's quote, but even he didn't recognize it, so I
>>>misunderstood.
>>
>>When Bob pointed out you seemed to be trying to use a foreign key
>>reference for a uniqueness constraint, Bob's point was uniqueness
>>constraints are not foreign key references. You need to use a uniqueness
>>constraint instead.
> > Jim thinks that referring to oneself in third person is the first sign > of madness. Or is it hairy palms? I can never remember....
Madness? I have been mad since 1976. I'm as mad as hell and I am not going to take this anymore!
(Sadly, some people never run out of bullshit.) Received on Mon Dec 31 2007 - 04:50:22 CET