Re: One-To-One Relationships
From: David Cressey <cressey73_at_verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 11:08:17 GMT
Message-ID: <Bgb4j.3097$VJ.219_at_trndny05>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 11:08:17 GMT
Message-ID: <Bgb4j.3097$VJ.219_at_trndny05>
"paul c" <toledobythesea_at_ooyah.ac> wrote in message
news:et24j.80277$cD.13174_at_pd7urf2no...
> JOG wrote:
> ...
> > Why don't you first define the term entity, as opposed to just
> > assuming their existence as axiomatic. I look forward to there being
> > absolutely no room for debate or disagreement! Look, you get a lot of
> > respect on this forum, particularly off myself, but this does not
> > excuse arrogance, so now we are all ears.
> > ...
>
> PMFJI but this is just too much fun not to have a go: Something that
> exists?
>
Anything that has been reified, and whose instances display haeccity.
Sorry, I couldn't resist.
Received on Sat Dec 01 2007 - 12:08:17 CET