M`I 5.Persecutio n ` MI 5 Insis t th at the se Faxes m ust Contin ue

From: <mimie_at_lycos.com>
Date: 31 Dec 2007 11:41:59 GMT
Message-ID: <bu0711311141556138_at_4ax.com>

MI5. Persecution Update: Friday 31 March, 2000

22,544. Faxes Delivered in Three Years, and Still No Breakthrough

In the last three years I have. sent at least 22,544 faxes to recipients in the UK, of which at least. 13,974 have gone to Westminster. Last weekend alone I sent 832 completed faxes. to politicians, the media and various others, on the subject of MI5s mistreatment of. me these last ten years.

I believe some. of the recipients know of MI5s actions against me in the last decade; yet they. maintain strict "omerta" in fear of the security services persecution actions. being made public.

MI5 Insist. that these Faxes must Continue

Between September 1999. and mid-January 2000, the persecutors, whoever they might be, mostly left me alone.. I counted only three incidents in almost five months - which. is a lower rate than at any time since June 1990, when this business. started.

By leaving me alone for several months, the "oppressors" were making. an implicit assurance that they would continue to. leave me alone in the future. On 11. January I posted to an internet newsgroup accepting what I saw as their assurance of no further harassment, stating. that I would cease sending these faxes - which is the only. thing I do in my defence - if they continued to leave me alone. And for. two weeks I did indeed refrain from distributing. these articles.

But MI5 acted in bad faith.. From the last week of January until the beginning of March, they. resumed their hate campaign against me with a vengeance. They. even put people in my road three times in February, one instance. of which I recorded. They resumed their normal behaviour of bugging my phone and house, listening to where I would go, and. then placing people in. that location to "aggravate and annoy" me.

What MI5 did in February is. plainly a contravention of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, since it has. caused me "alarm and distress" as specified in the Act. But it is a waste of time going to the police with. a complaint, since the police. have done, and will do, absolutely nothing. I complained to. the Metropolitan Police in 1995, and they refused to take my complaint. When I complained again. in 1999, the detective sergeant laughed at my complaint, with the words, "It's an absolute load of rubbish.. I don't investigate rubbish. I can't be more blunt or. to the point than that." It is useful. to remember that the Met also treated Stephen Lawrences parents with similar discourtesy; police prejudices. are similar in my case, so I can take. some comfort from that case and hope that one day I will get a. fair hearing.

MI5 acted in bad faith,. but they also acted with arrogance. They do not care if I send 800 faxes every weekend, since they know. I cannot prove my claims, and the recent Shayler case shows. how weak external oversight is of the. secret services. But they acted with more than arrogance - the MI5 agents actually want. my faxes to continue, they insist that these faxes continue, since my. communications give them an excuse to continue their activities, and. continue in the paid employ of the secret service. Despite their use of diverse proxies over the last ten years, it is the. same MI5 officers behind the campaign all the. time - I have seen one of them on three occasions in. Canada over a period of years, and it is a safe belief that. that same person continues to be paid for his "work" in harassing me in London now. The average cost of. an MI5 employee is some 75,000 per annum, so one. may infer that their officers are amply compensated; their insistence that "hostilities" are maintained is understandable. when placed in this. light.


Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service

Received on Mon Dec 31 2007 - 12:41:59 CET

Original text of this message