Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?

From: raylopez99 <raylopez99_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 00:27:11 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <b722df4a-56b2-4f74-aca3-12813610c1b2_at_l32g2000hse.googlegroups.com>

On Dec 29, 5:42�pm, Marshall <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks. I could not get the compound key to work in Access, which is a bit strange (the restriction on whether a foreign key is a duplicate or is unique is rather hidden). After many permutations, I gave up, but it could be a peculiarity of Access.

RL Received on Sun Dec 30 2007 - 09:27:11 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bob Badour: "Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?"
Previous message: Jeff: "Functional Dependency algorithm"
Maybe in reply to: Marshall: "Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?"
Next in thread: Bob Badour: "Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?"
Reply: Bob Badour: "Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message