Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?

On Dec 31, 3:50 am, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> JOG wrote:
> > On Dec 31, 12:51 am, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> >>raylopez99 wrote:
>
> >>>On Dec 30, 2:19 pm, mAsterdam <mAster..._at_vrijdag.org> wrote:
>
> >>>>raylopez99 wrote:
>
> >>>>>OK wise guy <g>, I kindly beseech thee to give me a simple schema that
> >>>>>will do the following: "to declare a uniqueness constraint as a
> >>>>>foreign key reference" that allows me to do the following:
>
> >>>>Where did you get the quoted part? It is unclear.
>
> >>>I think that was Bob's quote, but even he didn't recognize it, so I
> >>>misunderstood.
>
> >>When Bob pointed out you seemed to be trying to use a foreign key
> >>reference for a uniqueness constraint, Bob's point was uniqueness
> >>constraints are not foreign key references. You need to use a uniqueness
> >>constraint instead.
>
> > Jim thinks that referring to oneself in third person is the first sign
> > of madness. Or is it hairy palms? I can never remember....
>
> Madness? I have been mad since 1976. I'm as mad as hell and I am not
> going to take this anymore!

Dare I ask what happened in 1976? I'm pretty sure XML didn't appear until the 90's ;)

>
> (Sadly, some people never run out of bullshit.)
Received on Mon Dec 31 2007 - 05:15:16 CET