Re: One-To-One Relationships
From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 11:13:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3d9e16e0-b202-4d3b-bc31-c368c4b0b5f3_at_e67g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 11:13:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3d9e16e0-b202-4d3b-bc31-c368c4b0b5f3_at_e67g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
On 1 déc, 18:21, JOG <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Dec 1, 4:52 pm, rp..._at_pcwin518.campus.tue.nl (rpost) wrote:
>
> > snip
> > ER modelling allows me to assert the identifiability of a relationship
> > *without* reference to identifying attributes.
>
> This is a contradiction to your previous statement. A relationship can
> not be identifiable if it has no identity. Its an oxymoron.
Huhh...Isn't a name a way to identify an entity?
[Snipped rest because I agree with most part]
Received on Sat Dec 01 2007 - 20:13:06 CET