- Re: primary ID trick: speed/disk space? --CELKO-- (Thu May 01 2003 - 01:20:20 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss --CELKO-- (Thu May 01 2003 - 01:41:59 CEST)
- Re: One to One relationships Bernard Peek (Thu May 01 2003 - 02:12:41 CEST)
- Re: One to One relationships Rich Dillon (Thu May 01 2003 - 06:36:47 CEST)
- Re: Table design problem Mike Sherrill (Thu May 01 2003 - 13:41:34 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Fri May 02 2003 - 14:21:36 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Pablo Sanchez (Fri May 02 2003 - 17:14:33 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Fri May 02 2003 - 16:51:17 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Fri May 02 2003 - 16:54:30 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Fri May 02 2003 - 18:18:15 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Fri May 02 2003 - 18:41:07 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Mikito Harakiri (Fri May 02 2003 - 20:34:45 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Pablo Sanchez (Fri May 02 2003 - 21:17:06 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Costin Cozianu (Sat May 03 2003 - 00:09:37 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Sat May 03 2003 - 00:19:31 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Sat May 03 2003 - 00:22:42 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Sat May 03 2003 - 04:21:58 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Sat May 03 2003 - 04:32:47 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Sat May 03 2003 - 04:41:33 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Lauri Pietarinen (Sat May 03 2003 - 07:00:07 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Lauri Pietarinen (Sat May 03 2003 - 07:29:46 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Patrick Schaaf (Sat May 03 2003 - 08:58:35 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Sat May 03 2003 - 19:05:06 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Alfredo Novoa (Sat May 03 2003 - 19:32:21 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Sat May 03 2003 - 20:04:22 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Sat May 03 2003 - 20:24:27 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Lauri Pietarinen (Sat May 03 2003 - 20:19:16 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Alfredo Novoa (Sat May 03 2003 - 20:34:14 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Sat May 03 2003 - 20:34:46 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Lauri Pietarinen (Sat May 03 2003 - 20:35:29 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Alfredo Novoa (Sat May 03 2003 - 20:41:35 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Sat May 03 2003 - 20:50:32 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Alfredo Novoa (Sat May 03 2003 - 20:51:30 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Sat May 03 2003 - 21:03:46 CEST)
- Re: XML and RDBMS/OODBMS Alfredo Novoa (Sat May 03 2003 - 21:03:59 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Sat May 03 2003 - 21:06:07 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Sat May 03 2003 - 21:08:21 CEST)
- Re: XML and RDBMS/OODBMS Marshall Spight (Sat May 03 2003 - 21:14:25 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Sat May 03 2003 - 21:28:11 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Bob Badour (Sat May 03 2003 - 21:48:02 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Lauri Pietarinen (Sat May 03 2003 - 22:28:14 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Lauri Pietarinen (Sat May 03 2003 - 22:49:05 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Sat May 03 2003 - 23:23:46 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Sun May 04 2003 - 04:44:15 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Sun May 04 2003 - 05:19:13 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Sun May 04 2003 - 06:39:18 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Sun May 04 2003 - 06:43:35 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Kunle Odutola (Sun May 04 2003 - 14:00:03 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Sun May 04 2003 - 22:40:40 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Sun May 04 2003 - 23:01:50 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Kunle Odutola (Sun May 04 2003 - 23:39:08 CEST)
- Re: Foriegn key which could point to multiple tables? Paul Keister (Mon May 05 2003 - 00:21:23 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Mon May 05 2003 - 00:24:28 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Mon May 05 2003 - 00:58:44 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Mon May 05 2003 - 01:22:04 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Mon May 05 2003 - 01:34:14 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Mon May 05 2003 - 01:55:19 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Mon May 05 2003 - 02:06:22 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Mon May 05 2003 - 02:12:12 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Mon May 05 2003 - 02:25:50 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Mon May 05 2003 - 02:43:23 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Mon May 05 2003 - 02:50:08 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Mon May 05 2003 - 03:04:53 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Mon May 05 2003 - 03:30:01 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Mon May 05 2003 - 03:39:41 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Mon May 05 2003 - 04:26:50 CEST)
- Re: Design question san (Mon May 05 2003 - 07:01:23 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Lauri Pietarinen (Mon May 05 2003 - 10:58:33 CEST)
- Re: Foriegn key which could point to multiple tables? Eric Gibson (Mon May 05 2003 - 12:00:06 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Alfredo Novoa (Mon May 05 2003 - 12:05:39 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Alfredo Novoa (Mon May 05 2003 - 12:27:17 CEST)
- Re: Foriegn key which could point to multiple tables? Eric Gibson (Mon May 05 2003 - 15:29:45 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Mon May 05 2003 - 17:41:29 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Mon May 05 2003 - 17:43:15 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Mon May 05 2003 - 18:03:10 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Mon May 05 2003 - 18:09:47 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Mon May 05 2003 - 18:18:06 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Alfredo Novoa (Mon May 05 2003 - 18:28:20 CEST)
- Re: Foriegn key which could point to multiple tables? Paul Keister (Mon May 05 2003 - 18:36:46 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Mon May 05 2003 - 19:22:49 CEST)
- Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Todd Bandrowsky (Tue May 06 2003 - 01:15:48 CEST)
- Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Todd Bandrowsky (Tue May 06 2003 - 01:17:01 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Paul Vernon (Tue May 06 2003 - 00:17:30 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Paul Vernon (Tue May 06 2003 - 01:02:09 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Tue May 06 2003 - 03:47:57 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Tue May 06 2003 - 03:51:41 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Tue May 06 2003 - 04:55:58 CEST)
- Re: Table design problem Roy Hann (Tue May 06 2003 - 13:11:48 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Nigel Day (Tue May 06 2003 - 13:05:25 CEST)
- Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Paul Vernon (Tue May 06 2003 - 14:42:38 CEST)
- Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Steve Long (Tue May 06 2003 - 18:41:57 CEST)
- Re: XML and RDBMS/OODBMS Steve Long (Tue May 06 2003 - 18:50:52 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Paul Vernon (Tue May 06 2003 - 18:02:05 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Paul Vernon (Tue May 06 2003 - 18:46:27 CEST)
- Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Paul Vernon (Tue May 06 2003 - 19:07:14 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Tue May 06 2003 - 19:16:05 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Tue May 06 2003 - 19:21:01 CEST)
- Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? --CELKO-- (Tue May 06 2003 - 20:08:50 CEST)
- Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Paul G. Brown (Tue May 06 2003 - 20:42:15 CEST)
- Re: XML and RDBMS/OODBMS Mirch Masala (Tue May 06 2003 - 20:56:19 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Tue May 06 2003 - 21:30:04 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Tue May 06 2003 - 21:35:45 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Tue May 06 2003 - 21:53:10 CEST)
- Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Carl Rosenberger (Tue May 06 2003 - 22:04:54 CEST)
- Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Carl Rosenberger (Tue May 06 2003 - 22:09:50 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Mikito Harakiri (Tue May 06 2003 - 22:07:43 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Tue May 06 2003 - 23:01:21 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Tue May 06 2003 - 23:16:40 CEST)
- Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? tj bandrowsky (Wed May 07 2003 - 01:37:11 CEST)
- Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? tj bandrowsky (Wed May 07 2003 - 01:43:09 CEST)
- Re: XML and RDBMS/OODBMS karl wettin (Tue May 06 2003 - 23:02:00 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? tj bandrowsky (Wed May 07 2003 - 02:06:15 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Wed May 07 2003 - 03:30:47 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Pablo Sanchez (Wed May 07 2003 - 07:06:27 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Wed May 07 2003 - 07:18:52 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Kunle Odutola (Wed May 07 2003 - 14:12:27 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? André Næss (Wed May 07 2003 - 14:32:47 CEST)
- Re: mysql problem help Steve Long (Wed May 07 2003 - 15:56:25 CEST)
- Re: One to One relationships AK (Wed May 07 2003 - 16:47:49 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Wed May 07 2003 - 17:10:02 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Wed May 07 2003 - 17:37:02 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Wed May 07 2003 - 18:02:35 CEST)
- Re: Table design problem Mike Sherrill (Wed May 07 2003 - 18:11:36 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Wed May 07 2003 - 18:48:18 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Wed May 07 2003 - 19:26:03 CEST)
- Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Paul Vernon (Wed May 07 2003 - 18:04:32 CEST)
- Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Paul Vernon (Wed May 07 2003 - 18:34:20 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Paul Vernon (Wed May 07 2003 - 18:15:16 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Paul Vernon (Wed May 07 2003 - 18:21:13 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Paul Vernon (Wed May 07 2003 - 18:53:37 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Wed May 07 2003 - 18:58:53 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Wed May 07 2003 - 19:53:06 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Wed May 07 2003 - 19:56:26 CEST)
- Re: Design question Mike Schuler (Wed May 07 2003 - 20:00:30 CEST)
- Re: One to One relationships --CELKO-- (Wed May 07 2003 - 20:30:48 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Wed May 07 2003 - 21:18:30 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? André Næss (Wed May 07 2003 - 22:41:14 CEST)
- Re: One to One relationships Nelson Ricardo (Wed May 07 2003 - 23:17:42 CEST)
- Re: Table design problem Mike Sherrill (Wed May 07 2003 - 23:45:58 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Todd Bandrowsky (Thu May 08 2003 - 01:01:02 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Thu May 08 2003 - 01:57:25 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Wed May 07 2003 - 23:53:12 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Wed May 07 2003 - 23:55:06 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Thu May 08 2003 - 02:09:28 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Thu May 08 2003 - 04:11:55 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Thu May 08 2003 - 05:36:52 CEST)
- Re: One to One relationships stu (Thu May 08 2003 - 15:15:52 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Paul Vernon (Thu May 08 2003 - 11:36:28 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Paul Vernon (Thu May 08 2003 - 14:30:09 CEST)
- Re: Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Todd Bandrowsky (Thu May 08 2003 - 16:11:43 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Pablo Sanchez (Thu May 08 2003 - 16:30:20 CEST)
- Re: One to One relationships Anton Versteeg (Thu May 08 2003 - 17:06:39 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Thu May 08 2003 - 17:31:34 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Pablo Sanchez (Thu May 08 2003 - 18:47:39 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Pablo Sanchez (Thu May 08 2003 - 19:16:19 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Pablo Sanchez (Thu May 08 2003 - 20:39:25 CEST)
- Re: One to One relationships Bernard Peek (Thu May 08 2003 - 21:17:23 CEST)
- Re: One to One relationships Bernard Peek (Thu May 08 2003 - 21:30:46 CEST)
- Re: minimizing contact with the database Steve Long (Fri May 09 2003 - 04:17:29 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Marshall Spight (Fri May 09 2003 - 04:41:30 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Marshall Spight (Fri May 09 2003 - 04:44:49 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Bob Foster (Fri May 09 2003 - 07:22:01 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Fri May 09 2003 - 12:18:21 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Fri May 09 2003 - 12:02:52 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Fri May 09 2003 - 12:30:58 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Paul Vernon (Fri May 09 2003 - 12:44:30 CEST)
- Re: SQL Statement Question Alan (Fri May 09 2003 - 16:13:35 CEST)
- Re: Decomposition Question Alan (Fri May 09 2003 - 16:13:55 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Marshall Spight (Fri May 09 2003 - 16:47:28 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Fri May 09 2003 - 18:24:44 CEST)
- Re: Thoughts on List items - foreign key vs. storing codes --CELKO-- (Fri May 09 2003 - 19:59:52 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Bob Foster (Fri May 09 2003 - 22:21:49 CEST)
- Re: Access Paths: Will these produce equivalent results? --CELKO-- (Sat May 10 2003 - 00:04:17 CEST)
- Re: Access Paths: Will these produce equivalent results? John Gilson (Sat May 10 2003 - 00:24:04 CEST)
- Re: Access Paths: Will these produce equivalent results? Mikito Harakiri (Sat May 10 2003 - 01:01:03 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Bob Badour (Sat May 10 2003 - 04:22:20 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Bob Badour (Sat May 10 2003 - 04:15:58 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Bob Foster (Sat May 10 2003 - 04:45:21 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Bob Badour (Sat May 10 2003 - 04:19:20 CEST)
- Re: How to express SQL3/OLAP analysis functions by ORACLE9iR2 DML ? Bob Badour (Sat May 10 2003 - 04:14:17 CEST)
- Re: How to express SQL3/OLAP analysis functions by ORACLE9iR2 DML ? Jack Dull (Sat May 10 2003 - 10:26:40 CEST)
- Re: How to express SQL3/OLAP analysis functions by ORACLE9iR2 DML ? Nigel Pendse (Sat May 10 2003 - 11:40:12 CEST)
- Re: How to express SQL3/OLAP analysis functions by ORACLE9iR2 DML ? ChrisMc (Sat May 10 2003 - 15:35:01 CEST)
- Re: How to express SQL3/OLAP analysis functions by ORACLE9iR2 DML ? Kevin Lancaster (Sat May 10 2003 - 23:44:49 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Todd Bandrowsky (Sun May 11 2003 - 03:32:16 CEST)
- Re: Nested Sets Insertion --CELKO-- (Sun May 11 2003 - 05:16:24 CEST)
- Re: boolean logic expressed in RDBMS rows --CELKO-- (Sun May 11 2003 - 05:28:18 CEST)
- Re: Auto increment --CELKO-- (Sun May 11 2003 - 05:30:20 CEST)
- Re: Auto increment Marshall Spight (Sun May 11 2003 - 07:30:19 CEST)
- Re: Auto increment shaun (Sun May 11 2003 - 15:05:29 CEST)
- Re: Auto increment Marshall Spight (Sun May 11 2003 - 19:31:29 CEST)
- Re: Auto increment Tim Landscheidt (Sun May 11 2003 - 22:00:28 CEST)
- Re: Access Paths: Will these produce equivalent results? andrewst (Sun May 11 2003 - 15:37:31 CEST)
- Re: Nested Sets Insertion Enu (Mon May 12 2003 - 04:42:03 CEST)
- Re: Auto increment Daniel S. Guntermann (Mon May 12 2003 - 06:39:10 CEST)
- Re: Auto increment Daniel S. Guntermann (Mon May 12 2003 - 07:15:14 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Mon May 12 2003 - 12:59:05 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Paul Vernon (Mon May 12 2003 - 12:46:17 CEST)
- Re: Auto increment Tobin Harris (Mon May 12 2003 - 17:53:41 CEST)
- Re: boolean logic expressed in RDBMS rows Tokunaga T. (Mon May 12 2003 - 18:00:22 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Mon May 12 2003 - 19:03:02 CEST)
- Re: Auto increment Daniel S. Guntermann (Mon May 12 2003 - 19:42:44 CEST)
- Re: Auto increment AK (Mon May 12 2003 - 20:17:31 CEST)
- Re: Nested Sets Insertion Mikito Harakiri (Mon May 12 2003 - 20:30:40 CEST)
- Re: Nested Sets Insertion Enu (Mon May 12 2003 - 22:37:25 CEST)
- Re: Auto increment Enu (Mon May 12 2003 - 22:46:17 CEST)
- Re: Auto increment D Guntermann (Tue May 13 2003 - 00:15:29 CEST)
- Re: Nested Sets Insertion Mikito Harakiri (Tue May 13 2003 - 01:53:10 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Paul Vernon (Tue May 13 2003 - 00:57:25 CEST)
- Re: Nested Sets Insertion --CELKO-- (Tue May 13 2003 - 02:13:42 CEST)
- Re: boolean logic expressed in RDBMS rows --CELKO-- (Tue May 13 2003 - 02:42:42 CEST)
- Re: Auto increment --CELKO-- (Tue May 13 2003 - 02:48:02 CEST)
- Re: Nested Sets Insertion Marshall Spight (Tue May 13 2003 - 07:16:53 CEST)
- Re: domain theory and databases Bob Badour (Tue May 13 2003 - 08:26:39 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Bob Badour (Tue May 13 2003 - 08:36:53 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Bob Badour (Tue May 13 2003 - 08:39:40 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Daniel S. Guntermann (Tue May 13 2003 - 09:02:21 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Alfredo Novoa (Tue May 13 2003 - 12:04:08 CEST)
- Re: Auto increment stu (Tue May 13 2003 - 12:16:28 CEST)
- Re: Auto increment Tobin Harris (Tue May 13 2003 - 14:05:17 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Sebastian Schaffert (Tue May 13 2003 - 14:18:19 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Paul Vernon (Tue May 13 2003 - 11:05:52 CEST)
- Re: Nested Sets Insertion san (Tue May 13 2003 - 15:47:29 CEST)
- Re: Nested Sets Insertion Mikito Harakiri (Tue May 13 2003 - 19:02:47 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Bob Badour (Tue May 13 2003 - 22:19:28 CEST)
- Re: Nested Sets Insertion Bob Badour (Tue May 13 2003 - 22:39:13 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Bob Foster (Tue May 13 2003 - 23:09:40 CEST)
- Re: Nested Sets Insertion Mikito Harakiri (Tue May 13 2003 - 23:48:52 CEST)
- Re: Nested Sets Insertion --CELKO-- (Wed May 14 2003 - 00:39:59 CEST)
- Re: Nested Sets Insertion Gene Wirchenko (Wed May 14 2003 - 02:59:42 CEST)
- Re: Enterprise Data Model benefits Kenneth Downs (Wed May 14 2003 - 04:18:41 CEST)
- Re: Enterprise Data Model benefits Gene Wirchenko (Wed May 14 2003 - 05:00:29 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Paul Vernon (Wed May 14 2003 - 11:45:59 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Bob Badour (Wed May 14 2003 - 18:50:42 CEST)
- Re: domain theory and databases Neo (Thu May 15 2003 - 02:26:14 CEST)
- Re: Nested Sets Insertion Lauri Pietarinen (Thu May 15 2003 - 14:19:12 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Mikito Harakiri (Thu May 15 2003 - 18:30:09 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Bob Badour (Thu May 15 2003 - 23:01:31 CEST)
- Re: Object databases beat joins (was: Re: ODMG Website?) Mikito Harakiri (Fri May 16 2003 - 00:08:53 CEST)
- Re: DB Design question Bob Badour (Fri May 16 2003 - 00:07:26 CEST)
- Re: Object databases beat joins (was: Re: ODMG Website?) Bob Badour (Fri May 16 2003 - 00:32:56 CEST)
- Re: boolean logic expressed in RDBMS rows M.N. (Fri May 16 2003 - 01:30:05 CEST)
- Re: Object databases beat joins (was: Re: ODMG Website?) Mikito Harakiri (Fri May 16 2003 - 01:30:01 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Paul Vernon (Thu May 15 2003 - 23:05:19 CEST)
- Re: Object databases beat joins (was: Re: ODMG Website?) Bob Badour (Fri May 16 2003 - 02:45:54 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Neo (Fri May 16 2003 - 08:08:27 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Sebastian Schaffert (Fri May 16 2003 - 10:24:49 CEST)
- Re: Object databases beat joins Adrian Veith (Fri May 16 2003 - 12:24:44 CEST)
- Re: domain theory and databases Paul (Fri May 16 2003 - 12:40:35 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Sebastian Schaffert (Fri May 16 2003 - 13:01:07 CEST)
- Re: DB Design question Lauri Pietarinen (Fri May 16 2003 - 13:06:01 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Sebastian Schaffert (Fri May 16 2003 - 13:15:22 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Paul Tiseo (Fri May 16 2003 - 15:55:02 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Sebastian Schaffert (Fri May 16 2003 - 17:23:16 CEST)
- Re: DB Design question Lauri Pietarinen (Fri May 16 2003 - 17:56:16 CEST)
- Re: Object databases beat joins (was: Re: ODMG Website?) Mikito Harakiri (Fri May 16 2003 - 18:25:14 CEST)
- Re: domain theory and databases Neo (Fri May 16 2003 - 18:38:44 CEST)
- Re: DB Design question Absinthe (Fri May 16 2003 - 19:23:49 CEST)
- Re: Nested Sets Insertion --CELKO-- (Fri May 16 2003 - 21:20:32 CEST)
- Re: Table / row lock strategy RayD (Fri May 16 2003 - 20:41:00 CEST)
- Re: Object databases beat joins (was: Re: ODMG Website?) Carl Rosenberger (Sat May 17 2003 - 19:59:17 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Neo (Sat May 17 2003 - 20:48:47 CEST)
- Re: Object databases beat joins (was: Re: ODMG Website?) Alfredo Novoa (Sun May 18 2003 - 00:27:51 CEST)
- Re: Object databases beat joins (was: Re: ODMG Website?) Marshall Spight (Sun May 18 2003 - 01:36:42 CEST)
- Re: Object databases beat joins (was: Re: ODMG Website?) Marshall Spight (Sun May 18 2003 - 01:39:48 CEST)
- Re: Object databases beat joins (was: Re: ODMG Website?) Peter Koch Larsen (Sun May 18 2003 - 01:52:35 CEST)
- Re: Object databases beat joins (was: Re: ODMG Website?) Jonathan Leffler (Sun May 18 2003 - 02:53:35 CEST)
- Re: how to use an aggregate function Lennart Jonsson (Sun May 18 2003 - 06:11:55 CEST)
- Re: column order in select * from Gene Wirchenko (Sun May 18 2003 - 06:50:23 CEST)
- Re: New theories on how we are artificial intelligence. Neo (Sun May 18 2003 - 22:00:05 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Kenneth Downs (Mon May 19 2003 - 01:53:06 CEST)
- Re: domain theory and databases Paul (Mon May 19 2003 - 11:17:05 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Todd Bandrowsky (Mon May 19 2003 - 14:28:09 CEST)
- Re: Client server design question. Tobin Harris (Mon May 19 2003 - 14:31:19 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Neo (Mon May 19 2003 - 15:06:22 CEST)
- Re: New theories on how we are artificial intelligence. Paul Vernon (Mon May 19 2003 - 14:02:32 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Paul Vernon (Mon May 19 2003 - 17:46:03 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Tom Ivar Helbekkmo (Mon May 19 2003 - 20:48:56 CEST)
- Re: New theories on how we are artificial intelligence. Paul G. Brown (Mon May 19 2003 - 22:25:12 CEST)
- Re: New theories on how we are artificial intelligence. Neo (Mon May 19 2003 - 22:47:42 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Neo (Mon May 19 2003 - 23:07:35 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Kenneth Downs (Tue May 20 2003 - 02:49:53 CEST)
- Re: New theories on how we are artificial intelligence. D Guntermann (Tue May 20 2003 - 02:45:07 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Todd Bandrowsky (Tue May 20 2003 - 04:52:34 CEST)
- Re: New theories on how we are artificial intelligence. Paul (Tue May 20 2003 - 10:19:36 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Paul Vernon (Tue May 20 2003 - 19:09:34 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question steve.tolkin_at_fmr.com (Tue May 20 2003 - 17:59:40 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Todd Bandrowsky (Tue May 20 2003 - 23:29:31 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Neo (Wed May 21 2003 - 00:26:14 CEST)
- Re: questions about OODBMS karl wettin (Wed May 21 2003 - 04:38:42 CEST)
- Re: weighted random selection of record John Gilson (Wed May 21 2003 - 07:02:05 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Paul Vernon (Wed May 21 2003 - 17:38:45 CEST)
- Re: weighted random selection of record Stuart McGraw (Wed May 21 2003 - 19:54:34 CEST)
- Re: weighted random selection of record Stuart McGraw (Wed May 21 2003 - 19:58:47 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question steve.tolkin_at_fmr.com (Wed May 21 2003 - 16:01:19 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Jonathan Leffler (Thu May 22 2003 - 07:08:54 CEST)
- Re: Table design problem Gene Wirchenko (Thu May 22 2003 - 17:52:32 CEST)
- Re: Business Intelligence and Software Development Bart (Fri May 23 2003 - 05:18:31 CEST)
- Re: Business Intelligence and Software Development Jan Eric Mortensen (Fri May 23 2003 - 10:32:52 CEST)
- Re: Auto increment vincent (Fri May 23 2003 - 20:08:12 CEST)
- Re: Data Model - Please Comment on my Approach --CELKO-- (Sat May 24 2003 - 00:01:03 CEST)
- Re: Database Question Erland Sommarskog (Sat May 24 2003 - 00:09:51 CEST)
- Re: domains aren't subtypes, right? Mike Sherrill (Sat May 24 2003 - 00:07:50 CEST)
- Re: Database Question --CELKO-- (Sat May 24 2003 - 00:26:13 CEST)
- Re: Data Model - Please Comment on my Approach Karsten Farrell (Sat May 24 2003 - 01:18:56 CEST)
- Re: Business Intelligence and Software Development Bob Badour (Sat May 24 2003 - 01:39:59 CEST)
- Re: Data Model - Please Comment on my Approach Kenneth Downs (Sat May 24 2003 - 19:01:09 CEST)
- Re: Data Model - Please Comment on my Approach Kenneth Downs (Sat May 24 2003 - 19:06:09 CEST)
- Re: Database Question Bas (Sun May 25 2003 - 18:34:25 CEST)
- Re: domains aren't subtypes, right? Alfredo Novoa (Sun May 25 2003 - 20:23:53 CEST)
- Re: Database Question Michael Kutuzov (Sun May 25 2003 - 20:37:56 CEST)
- Re: Database Builders, Code Generators, On-Topic? Bob Badour (Mon May 26 2003 - 00:35:58 CEST)
- Re: Database Builders, Code Generators, On-Topic? Marshall Spight (Mon May 26 2003 - 03:58:39 CEST)
- Re: Database Builders, Code Generators, On-Topic? Kenneth Downs (Mon May 26 2003 - 04:44:18 CEST)
- Re: Database Builders, Code Generators, On-Topic? Bob Badour (Mon May 26 2003 - 07:34:47 CEST)
- Re: 2 way replication? Pascal Loonen (Mon May 26 2003 - 12:35:04 CEST)
- Re: domains aren't subtypes, right? Alfredo Novoa (Mon May 26 2003 - 14:02:06 CEST)
- Re: domains aren't subtypes, right? Alfredo Novoa (Mon May 26 2003 - 14:10:21 CEST)
- Re: Database Builders, Code Generators, On-Topic? Kenneth Downs (Mon May 26 2003 - 16:52:24 CEST)
- Re: Database Builders, Code Generators, On-Topic? Marshall Spight (Mon May 26 2003 - 18:10:11 CEST)
- Re: Database Builders, Code Generators, On-Topic? Marshall Spight (Mon May 26 2003 - 18:19:28 CEST)
- Re: Database Builders, Code Generators, On-Topic? Bob Badour (Mon May 26 2003 - 21:57:33 CEST)
- Re: Database Builders, Code Generators, On-Topic? Bob Badour (Mon May 26 2003 - 21:57:36 CEST)
- Re: Database Builders, Code Generators, On-Topic? Kenneth Downs (Tue May 27 2003 - 01:11:07 CEST)
- Re: 2 way replication? Walter L. Preuninger II (Tue May 27 2003 - 03:19:18 CEST)
- Re: 2 way replication? Christopher Browne (Tue May 27 2003 - 04:35:57 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Todd Bandrowsky (Tue May 27 2003 - 16:22:34 CEST)
- Re: domains aren't subtypes, right? Mikito Harakiri (Tue May 27 2003 - 18:38:50 CEST)
- Re: 2 way replication? Larry Anderson (Tue May 27 2003 - 22:09:40 CEST)
- Re: domains aren't subtypes, right? Nuno Souto (Wed May 28 2003 - 02:42:57 CEST)
- Re: domains aren't subtypes, right? Mikito Harakiri (Wed May 28 2003 - 03:05:57 CEST)
- Re: domains aren't subtypes, right? Gene Wirchenko (Wed May 28 2003 - 04:03:30 CEST)
- Re: Ad-hoc query Marshall Spight (Wed May 28 2003 - 04:30:10 CEST)
- Re: domains aren't subtypes, right? Alfredo Novoa (Wed May 28 2003 - 11:18:33 CEST)
- Re: Queries as data Pierre Pönisch (Wed May 28 2003 - 12:55:25 CEST)
- Re: Query streams Michal Widera (Wed May 28 2003 - 13:50:08 CEST)
- Re: Ad-hoc query Michal Widera (Wed May 28 2003 - 13:58:24 CEST)
- Re: Queries as data Neo (Wed May 28 2003 - 18:00:13 CEST)
- Censore in Borland Groups (was: borland.public.delphi.oodesign) Alfredo Novoa (Wed May 28 2003 - 18:43:10 CEST)
- Re: Query streams Juan Pardillos (Wed May 28 2003 - 23:17:30 CEST)
- Re: Queries as data Juan Pardillos (Wed May 28 2003 - 23:18:58 CEST)
- Re: Queries as data Mikito Harakiri (Wed May 28 2003 - 23:57:24 CEST)
- Re: Database Builders, Code Generators, On-Topic? Bob Badour (Thu May 29 2003 - 01:17:57 CEST)
- Re: Database Builders, Code Generators, On-Topic? andrewst (Thu May 29 2003 - 11:44:14 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Neo (Thu May 29 2003 - 17:31:34 CEST)
- Re: Denormalization problem Karel Miklav (Fri May 30 2003 - 07:23:16 CEST)
- Re: The Transrelational Model Karel Miklav (Fri May 30 2003 - 08:02:53 CEST)
- Re: view with a rownum Andy (Fri May 30 2003 - 11:20:56 CEST)
- Re: view with a rownum Ilariu Raducan (Fri May 30 2003 - 14:55:22 CEST)
- Re: The Transrelational Model Neo (Fri May 30 2003 - 20:14:36 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Thu May 01 2003 - 14:42:56 CEST)
- Re: Selectivity GoranG (Thu May 01 2003 - 23:48:16 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Neo (Fri May 02 2003 - 00:18:00 CEST)
- Re: XML and RDBMS/OODBMS Mikito Harakiri (Fri May 02 2003 - 00:38:53 CEST)
- Read this....it works !!! ;5+83L9qNZ Dave Smith (Fri May 02 2003 - 12:22:06 CEST)
- Re: name conflicts in rdbms --CELKO-- (Sat May 03 2003 - 00:16:13 CEST)
- Re: Problems with SELECT * --CELKO-- (Sat May 03 2003 - 00:24:23 CEST)
- Re: newbie: using id's or total desciption FD Góngora Acién (Sat May 03 2003 - 10:06:43 CEST)
- Design question san (Sun May 04 2003 - 08:37:59 CEST)
- Foriegn key which could point to multiple tables? Eric Gibson (Sun May 04 2003 - 23:22:18 CEST)
- Alternatives to ACID, non-serialized concurrent transactions? Todd Bandrowsky (Mon May 05 2003 - 05:20:34 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Todd Bandrowsky (Mon May 05 2003 - 18:19:13 CEST)
- Column Naming Question john (Tue May 06 2003 - 00:42:44 CEST)
- data modeling multi axis context Scott Buck (Tue May 06 2003 - 01:40:26 CEST)
- design problem with fk part of pk in oracle env osy45 (Tue May 06 2003 - 17:35:57 CEST)
- Re: One to One relationships AK (Tue May 06 2003 - 17:38:56 CEST)
- mysql problem help logia (Tue May 06 2003 - 20:16:47 CEST)
- CFP: DOA 2003 hakan ferhatosmanoglu (Wed May 07 2003 - 16:29:04 CEST)
- CFP: CoopIS 2003 hakan ferhatosmanoglu (Wed May 07 2003 - 16:38:18 CEST)
- CFP: ODBASE 2003 hakan ferhatosmanoglu (Wed May 07 2003 - 16:38:36 CEST)
- Thoughts on List items - foreign key vs. storing codes Robert (Wed May 07 2003 - 17:44:56 CEST)
- Book suggestions?? Mark Solomon (Wed May 07 2003 - 18:28:05 CEST)
- SQL Statement Question convo (Wed May 07 2003 - 19:25:15 CEST)
- Decomposition Question convo (Wed May 07 2003 - 19:26:26 CEST)
- Queries Question convo (Wed May 07 2003 - 19:27:19 CEST)
- minimizing contact with the database karl wettin (Thu May 08 2003 - 07:57:30 CEST)
- SQL question strider (Thu May 08 2003 - 14:49:03 CEST)
- Table Structure john (Thu May 08 2003 - 20:07:41 CEST)
- Re: XQuery question Costin Cozianu (Thu May 08 2003 - 20:43:59 CEST)
- How to express SQL3/OLAP analysis functions by ORACLE9iR2 DML ? firegoddess (Fri May 09 2003 - 11:24:24 CEST)
- Access Paths: Will these produce equivalent results? techy lname (Fri May 09 2003 - 20:41:50 CEST)
- Auto increment shaun (Sat May 10 2003 - 00:37:33 CEST)
- Invitation to Join SV_RFID! SV_RFID Moderator (Sat May 10 2003 - 08:03:36 CEST)
- boolean logic expressed in RDBMS rows M.N. (Sat May 10 2003 - 11:39:57 CEST)
- Nested Sets Insertion Enu (Sat May 10 2003 - 23:19:52 CEST)
- NEED HELP FOR A MAGIC TRICK Me (Mon May 12 2003 - 06:06:18 CEST)
- Police Forensic and Eliminating software..................Download Now zzzzszzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz [1/2] xuztuc_at_HSD2$76.NET5 (Mon May 12 2003 - 08:09:38 CEST)
- Police Forensic and Eliminating software..................Download Now zzzzszzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz [78/2] xuztuc_at_HSD2$76.NET5 (Mon May 12 2003 - 08:09:38 CEST)
- Table / row lock strategy Robert (Mon May 12 2003 - 11:36:37 CEST)
- SQL Diagram Syntax Thineven (Mon May 12 2003 - 14:04:09 CEST)
- domain theory and databases Mathias Neumueller (Mon May 12 2003 - 18:47:44 CEST)
- Enterprise Data Model benefits Dean (Tue May 13 2003 - 11:03:23 CEST)
- Final CFP: XML Database Symposium at VLDB 2003 Mirch Masala (Tue May 13 2003 - 11:28:15 CEST)
- Where did the ODMG (object data model group) organization go? D Guntermann (Wed May 14 2003 - 00:26:11 CEST)
- CFP -- OTM 2003 Federated Event, Italy Zahir Tari (Wed May 14 2003 - 10:05:22 CEST)
- Client server design question. sello (Thu May 15 2003 - 10:05:59 CEST)
- Object databases beat joins (was: Re: ODMG Website?) Carl Rosenberger (Thu May 15 2003 - 23:18:16 CEST)
- DB Design question Naran Hirani (Thu May 15 2003 - 23:20:05 CEST)
- column order in select * from Uwe Voigt (Fri May 16 2003 - 19:21:09 CEST)
- how to store page breaks drew (Fri May 16 2003 - 19:48:49 CEST)
- Naming Convention Russell Kahler (Fri May 16 2003 - 20:00:08 CEST)
- 4D/4DD to CSV or access seany (Fri May 16 2003 - 21:38:44 CEST)
- A new theory of numbers Doron Shadmi (Fri May 16 2003 - 23:54:44 CEST)
- New theories on how we are artificial intelligence. Kevin Nadeau (Sat May 17 2003 - 03:27:03 CEST)
- how to use an aggregate function jmsmithe (Sat May 17 2003 - 18:35:02 CEST)
- Why MaxN, MinN are Algebraic aggregate functions ? Jack Dull (Sun May 18 2003 - 06:15:45 CEST)
- In UML Class diagram, what's the difference between an arrow and a straight line ? B.Dimple (Mon May 19 2003 - 11:25:16 CEST)
- comp.databases.theory access stu (Mon May 19 2003 - 13:59:00 CEST)
- questions about OODBMS Funs Lemmens (Tue May 20 2003 - 12:32:25 CEST)
- weighted random selection of record Stuart McGraw (Tue May 20 2003 - 17:47:04 CEST)
- Shared geographical dimension vincent (Tue May 20 2003 - 22:29:14 CEST)
- What's the difference? Mike (Wed May 21 2003 - 16:45:55 CEST)
- Business Intelligence and Software Development CanztheMoose (Wed May 21 2003 - 18:17:08 CEST)
- worth a look John Dwyer (Wed May 21 2003 - 18:31:02 CEST)
- repeating calendar events ben (Thu May 22 2003 - 08:24:28 CEST)
- domains aren't subtypes, right? Marshall Spight (Fri May 23 2003 - 06:44:20 CEST)
- UML vs Referential Integrity JJ_at_NK (Fri May 23 2003 - 09:05:46 CEST)
- Database Question Victor Irzak (Fri May 23 2003 - 18:57:26 CEST)
- Data Model - Please Comment on my Approach Linda (Fri May 23 2003 - 20:02:47 CEST)
- 2 way replication? Walter L. Preuninger II (Sat May 24 2003 - 08:06:18 CEST)
- Re: Semantic Query optimization Bob Badour (Sat May 24 2003 - 23:22:27 CEST)
- Database Builders, Code Generators, On-Topic? Kenneth Downs (Sun May 25 2003 - 22:39:12 CEST)
- borland.public.delphi.oodesign Alfredo Novoa (Mon May 26 2003 - 02:00:50 CEST)
- Database design - Please comment my thoughts vincent (Mon May 26 2003 - 20:29:48 CEST)
- Query Challenge Aamir Baig (Tue May 27 2003 - 06:03:30 CEST)
- Sequence databases Juan Pardillos (Tue May 27 2003 - 23:44:40 CEST)
- Ad-hoc query Juan Pardillos (Tue May 27 2003 - 23:45:50 CEST)
- Monotonic quey Juan Pardillos (Tue May 27 2003 - 23:47:09 CEST)
- Query streams Juan Pardillos (Tue May 27 2003 - 23:49:42 CEST)
- Queries as data Juan Pardillos (Tue May 27 2003 - 23:53:51 CEST)
- Relational calculus vs. algebra calculus Juan Pardillos (Thu May 29 2003 - 00:20:20 CEST)
- New database design Karel Miklav (Thu May 29 2003 - 10:37:33 CEST)
- The Transrelational Model Alfredo Novoa (Thu May 29 2003 - 14:41:29 CEST)
- Denormalization problem Karel Miklav (Thu May 29 2003 - 15:50:30 CEST)
- view with a rownum Ilariu Raducan (Thu May 29 2003 - 19:42:00 CEST)
- SQL/MSDE query Paul Burns (Fri May 30 2003 - 00:44:45 CEST)
- Last message date: Fri May 30 2003 - 20:14:36 CEST
- Archived on: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 11:06:34 CEST
|