Re: Censore in Borland Groups (was: borland.public.delphi.oodesign)
From: Ed Prochak <edprochak_at_adelphia.net>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 19:16:15 GMT
Message-ID: <3ED50F43.5050305_at_adelphia.net>
>
>
> True enough, and you need to find an appropriate place to have that
> discussion, because this group is not it.
> ----
>
> By the way I will not miss this group a lot.
>
>
> Regards
> Alfredo
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 19:16:15 GMT
Message-ID: <3ED50F43.5050305_at_adelphia.net>
Alfredo Novoa wrote:
> It seems nobody is interested, but in case I want to say that I was
> CENSORED in borland.public.delphi.oodesign because I was discussing
> about where OO techniques are appropiate (data management,
> particulary), which was considered as a disrupting and harmful
> activity.
>
> A little example:
>
> ----
> On Wed, 28 May 2003 08:26:04 -0700, Ben Matterson
> <bmatterson_at_borland.com> wrote:
>
>
>>But there is not consensus about what OO design is, or about what OO >>design is intended for, or about when OO design is appropiate. >> >>All of above are very important points.
>
>
> True enough, and you need to find an appropriate place to have that
> discussion, because this group is not it.
> ----
>
> By the way I will not miss this group a lot.
>
>
> Regards
> Alfredo
Try comp.software-eng for OO discussions, especially like the issue you raise.
-- Ed Prochak running http://www.faqs.org/faqs/running-faq/ netiquette http://www.psg.com/emily.html -- "Two roads diverged in a wood and I I took the one less travelled by and that has made all the difference." robert frostReceived on Wed May 28 2003 - 21:16:15 CEST