Re: domains aren't subtypes, right?
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_mail.ocis.net>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 02:03:30 GMT
Message-ID: <3ed3e2b3.722232_at_news.ocis.net>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 02:03:30 GMT
Message-ID: <3ed3e2b3.722232_at_news.ocis.net>
"Mikito Harakiri" <mikharakiri_at_ywho.com> wrote:
[snip]
>That is just lame excuse for unability to develop arbitrary length String
>datatype. They have VARCHAR2 for stings that are less than 4000 chars,
>VARCHAR2 in PL/SQL limited to 32K, and finally CLOBs. Those are not
>subtypes, they are gisgusting implementation artifacts. Hello, it's 21st
>century, nobody programs cobol anymore!
It might not be so fashionable, but some people do.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences.
You have biases.
He/She has prejudices.
Received on Wed May 28 2003 - 04:03:30 CEST