Re: Selectivity
From: GoranG <no_at_spam.net>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 22:48:16 +0100
Message-ID: <5c53bvskmh0op7n6ib3qokm03p9vs76ucc_at_4ax.com>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 22:48:16 +0100
Message-ID: <5c53bvskmh0op7n6ib3qokm03p9vs76ucc_at_4ax.com>
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:46:19 -0400, "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote:
<cut>
>I don't know where you got the definition for s.
Elmasri, Navathe
>Perhaps a better definition
>would be one minus the ratio you gave earlier or even the reciprocal.
Yes!
>However, if the definition has wide acceptance in some body of work, you may
>just have to put up with the illogic of it.
Done. :)
( GoranG79 AT hotmail.com ) Received on Thu May 01 2003 - 23:48:16 CEST