Home
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
10 messages
:
Starting
Mon Dec 01 2003 - 15:25:01 CET,
Ending
Mon Dec 01 2003 - 00:24:25 CET
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Re: ANN - XDb
Joe \
(Mon Dec 01 2003 - 00:24:25 CET)
Re: [help] main memory db
Paul
(Mon Dec 01 2003 - 15:25:01 CET)
Re: [help] main memory db
Joe \
(Mon Dec 01 2003 - 18:35:02 CET)
Re: Questions about Nested Intervals by Vadim Tropashko one more time
Vadim Tropashko
(Tue Dec 02 2003 - 00:08:56 CET)
Re: Is this De-Normalization?
Bob Badour
(Tue Dec 02 2003 - 02:10:30 CET)
Re: [help] main memory db
Marshall Spight
(Tue Dec 02 2003 - 19:02:55 CET)
Re: [help] main memory db
Christopher Browne
(Tue Dec 02 2003 - 21:04:39 CET)
Re: [help] main memory db
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Dec 02 2003 - 22:58:05 CET)
Re: [help] main memory db
Christopher Browne
(Tue Dec 02 2003 - 23:52:26 CET)
Re: [help] main memory db
Joe \
(Tue Dec 02 2003 - 23:54:25 CET)
Re: [help] main memory db
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Dec 03 2003 - 00:58:46 CET)
Re: [help] main memory db
Joe \
(Wed Dec 03 2003 - 01:43:56 CET)
Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Andy
(Wed Dec 03 2003 - 18:15:34 CET)
Re: ANN - XDb
Neo
(Thu Dec 04 2003 - 17:29:59 CET)
Re: ANN - XDb
Neo
(Thu Dec 04 2003 - 19:46:40 CET)
Re: sum
Paul
(Fri Dec 05 2003 - 14:50:10 CET)
Re: 1st and 2nd NF
Larry Coon
(Fri Dec 05 2003 - 20:46:32 CET)
Re: 1st and 2nd NF
Alfredo Novoa
(Sat Dec 06 2003 - 12:46:24 CET)
Re: Making a tree with "millions and millions" of dynamic nodes
Christian Fowler
(Tue Dec 09 2003 - 07:28:23 CET)
Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Eric Junkermann
(Wed Dec 10 2003 - 14:04:55 CET)
Re: Making a tree with "millions and millions" of dynamic nodes
--CELKO--
(Wed Dec 10 2003 - 22:19:00 CET)
Re: Making a tree with "millions and millions" of dynamic nodes
John Isaacks
(Wed Dec 10 2003 - 23:23:32 CET)
Re: Making a tree with "millions and millions" of dynamic nodes
Bob Badour
(Thu Dec 11 2003 - 04:35:07 CET)
Re: Making a tree with "millions and millions" of dynamic nodes
Joe \
(Thu Dec 11 2003 - 06:36:38 CET)
Re: Codd article really that hard to get?
Amund Trovåg
(Thu Dec 11 2003 - 11:04:34 CET)
Re: Making a tree with "millions and millions" of dynamic nodes
John Isaacks
(Thu Dec 11 2003 - 16:03:40 CET)
Re: Codd article really that hard to get?
Bob Badour
(Thu Dec 11 2003 - 18:10:01 CET)
Re: Codd article really that hard to get?
Amund Trovåg
(Thu Dec 11 2003 - 18:56:22 CET)
Re: Wanted translator: predicate logic to SQL
John
(Thu Dec 11 2003 - 19:00:52 CET)
Re: Codd article really that hard to get?
Bob Badour
(Thu Dec 11 2003 - 20:17:31 CET)
Re: Codd article really that hard to get?
Amund Trovåg
(Thu Dec 11 2003 - 21:17:24 CET)
Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Tobin Harris
(Fri Dec 12 2003 - 00:22:42 CET)
Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Joe \
(Fri Dec 12 2003 - 01:34:16 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Jerry Gitomer
(Fri Dec 12 2003 - 05:07:39 CET)
Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Tobes \(Breath\)
(Fri Dec 12 2003 - 15:44:25 CET)
Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Joe \
(Fri Dec 12 2003 - 17:46:36 CET)
Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Bob Badour
(Fri Dec 12 2003 - 19:06:15 CET)
Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Louis Davidson
(Fri Dec 12 2003 - 21:24:02 CET)
Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Tobin Harris
(Fri Dec 12 2003 - 22:50:47 CET)
Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Bob Badour
(Sat Dec 13 2003 - 00:04:32 CET)
Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Mike MacSween
(Sat Dec 13 2003 - 09:40:28 CET)
Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Joe \
(Sat Dec 13 2003 - 19:01:13 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
--CELKO--
(Sun Dec 14 2003 - 23:04:52 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Tobes \(Breath\)
(Mon Dec 15 2003 - 16:42:10 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Brian Inglis
(Tue Dec 16 2003 - 12:02:16 CET)
Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Tobin Harris
(Tue Dec 16 2003 - 23:05:58 CET)
Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Bob Badour
(Wed Dec 17 2003 - 04:57:15 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Dec 17 2003 - 07:53:22 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Marshall Spight
(Wed Dec 17 2003 - 07:57:20 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Tony
(Wed Dec 17 2003 - 12:29:38 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Mike Sherrill
(Wed Dec 17 2003 - 12:46:24 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Tobes \(Breath\)
(Wed Dec 17 2003 - 13:04:06 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Tobes \(Breath\)
(Wed Dec 17 2003 - 13:21:45 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Bob Badour
(Wed Dec 17 2003 - 16:19:56 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Bob Badour
(Wed Dec 17 2003 - 16:31:37 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Bob Badour
(Wed Dec 17 2003 - 16:43:11 CET)
Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Tobes \(Breath\)
(Wed Dec 17 2003 - 18:25:46 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Dec 17 2003 - 21:46:40 CET)
Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Louis Davidson
(Wed Dec 17 2003 - 23:32:04 CET)
Re: ERD attributes or?
Arto V. Viitanen
(Thu Dec 18 2003 - 09:26:13 CET)
Elmasri or Date
shannon
(Thu Dec 18 2003 - 21:43:08 CET)
Re: Elmasri or Date
Costin Cozianu
(Fri Dec 19 2003 - 00:17:40 CET)
Re: Elmasri or Date
Bob Badour
(Thu Dec 18 2003 - 21:50:29 CET)
Re: Elmasri or Date
Alan
(Thu Dec 18 2003 - 21:53:44 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Roy Hann
(Thu Dec 18 2003 - 10:34:15 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Paul Vernon
(Thu Dec 18 2003 - 11:46:45 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Thu Dec 18 2003 - 15:48:39 CET)
Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Bob Badour
(Thu Dec 18 2003 - 19:20:00 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Bob Badour
(Thu Dec 18 2003 - 19:46:53 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Marshall Spight
(Thu Dec 18 2003 - 20:45:59 CET)
Re: ERD attributes or?
Barry
(Thu Dec 18 2003 - 23:07:35 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Joe \
(Fri Dec 19 2003 - 00:29:29 CET)
Re: ERD attributes or?
Bob Badour
(Fri Dec 19 2003 - 05:29:12 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Roy Hann
(Fri Dec 19 2003 - 10:23:43 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Mike Sherrill
(Fri Dec 19 2003 - 15:36:14 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Paul G. Brown
(Fri Dec 19 2003 - 19:10:53 CET)
Re: How to ensure only one of two sets of optional information?
Marshall Spight
(Sat Dec 20 2003 - 00:05:15 CET)
Re: How to ensure only one of two sets of optional information?
Marshall Spight
(Sat Dec 20 2003 - 00:08:29 CET)
Re: How to ensure only one of two sets of optional information?
--CELKO--
(Sat Dec 20 2003 - 00:59:24 CET)
Re: ODBC: Is there something called text/csv database?
Jay Tilton
(Sat Dec 20 2003 - 03:26:15 CET)
Re: ODBC: Is there something called text/csv database?
Social Liberal-Fiscal Conservative
(Sat Dec 20 2003 - 04:15:26 CET)
Re: Relational Database Comparison
Paul
(Sat Dec 20 2003 - 13:04:28 CET)
Re: Relational Database Comparison
Serge Rielau
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 22:39:14 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sat Dec 20 2003 - 15:42:51 CET)
Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders
Alfredo Novoa
(Sat Dec 20 2003 - 18:26:56 CET)
Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders
Alfredo Novoa
(Sat Dec 20 2003 - 18:41:16 CET)
Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders
Costin Cozianu
(Sat Dec 20 2003 - 23:36:50 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Joe \
(Sat Dec 20 2003 - 23:33:54 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sun Dec 21 2003 - 05:48:46 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Mike Sherrill
(Sun Dec 21 2003 - 07:27:02 CET)
Re: A Question on Integrety
Roy Hann
(Sun Dec 21 2003 - 15:53:12 CET)
Re: retrieve rows in a specified order
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sun Dec 21 2003 - 16:44:42 CET)
Re: retrieve rows in a specified order
Paul
(Sun Dec 21 2003 - 18:04:24 CET)
Re: retrieve rows in a specified order
Melon
(Sun Dec 21 2003 - 19:11:19 CET)
Re: retrieve rows in a specified order
Paul
(Sun Dec 21 2003 - 18:11:35 CET)
Re: retrieve rows in a specified order
Paul
(Sun Dec 21 2003 - 18:16:04 CET)
Re: retrieve rows in a specified order
Bob Badour
(Sun Dec 21 2003 - 19:19:03 CET)
Re: retrieve rows in a specified order
Christopher Browne
(Sun Dec 21 2003 - 19:27:39 CET)
Re: retrieve rows in a specified order
Christopher Browne
(Sun Dec 21 2003 - 19:27:41 CET)
Re: retrieve rows in a specified order
Bob Badour
(Sun Dec 21 2003 - 21:12:46 CET)
Re: retrieve rows in a specified order
Paul
(Sun Dec 21 2003 - 21:50:30 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Marshall Spight
(Sun Dec 21 2003 - 22:01:04 CET)
Re: retrieve rows in a specified order
Marshall Spight
(Sun Dec 21 2003 - 22:16:49 CET)
Re: retrieve rows in a specified order
Paul
(Mon Dec 22 2003 - 01:04:50 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Mon Dec 22 2003 - 01:54:14 CET)
Re: retrieve rows in a specified order
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Mon Dec 22 2003 - 04:38:42 CET)
Re: A problem with aggregation
batfflo
(Mon Dec 22 2003 - 08:25:30 CET)
Re: retrieve rows in a specified order
Melon
(Mon Dec 22 2003 - 13:45:32 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Marshall Spight
(Mon Dec 22 2003 - 18:35:34 CET)
Re: ODBC: Is there something called text/csv database?
Jim Gibson
(Mon Dec 22 2003 - 20:07:29 CET)
Re: How to ensure only one of two sets of optional information?
abombss
(Mon Dec 22 2003 - 21:07:30 CET)
Re: retrieve rows in a specified order
Paul
(Tue Dec 23 2003 - 00:51:48 CET)
Re: retrieve rows in a specified order
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Dec 23 2003 - 05:06:30 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Tue Dec 23 2003 - 07:01:35 CET)
Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders
Alfredo Novoa
(Tue Dec 23 2003 - 12:49:14 CET)
Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders
Costin Cozianu
(Tue Dec 23 2003 - 16:51:17 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Alfredo Novoa
(Tue Dec 23 2003 - 13:32:59 CET)
Re: when are check() constraints evaluated
Mike Sherrill
(Tue Dec 23 2003 - 16:01:31 CET)
Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders
Joe \
(Wed Dec 24 2003 - 01:17:58 CET)
Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders
Costin Cozianu
(Wed Dec 24 2003 - 04:03:56 CET)
Re: when are check() constraints evaluated
--CELKO--
(Wed Dec 24 2003 - 01:56:15 CET)
Re: A problem with aggregation
--CELKO--
(Wed Dec 24 2003 - 02:02:57 CET)
Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Dec 24 2003 - 13:38:44 CET)
Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders
Costin Cozianu
(Thu Dec 25 2003 - 01:40:08 CET)
Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Dec 24 2003 - 18:13:08 CET)
Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders
Alfredo Novoa
(Thu Dec 25 2003 - 10:55:22 CET)
Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders
Costin Cozianu
(Fri Dec 26 2003 - 09:04:03 CET)
Re: Sorting DatabaseTables by FK Constraints
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Dec 25 2003 - 23:31:19 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Marshall Spight
(Fri Dec 26 2003 - 18:23:42 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Joe \
(Fri Dec 26 2003 - 18:44:45 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Fri Dec 26 2003 - 19:21:40 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Joe \
(Fri Dec 26 2003 - 20:53:46 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Marshall Spight
(Fri Dec 26 2003 - 21:56:41 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Marshall Spight
(Fri Dec 26 2003 - 22:42:38 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Joe \
(Sat Dec 27 2003 - 04:44:03 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Marshall Spight
(Sat Dec 27 2003 - 04:49:01 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Sat Dec 27 2003 - 07:22:33 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Sat Dec 27 2003 - 07:28:38 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Sat Dec 27 2003 - 08:46:18 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Sat Dec 27 2003 - 23:51:50 CET)
Re: Disk IO scheduling
Anthony W. Youngman
(Sat Dec 27 2003 - 23:14:05 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Jonathan Leffler
(Sun Dec 28 2003 - 04:26:05 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sun Dec 28 2003 - 04:41:57 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Sun Dec 28 2003 - 06:02:47 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sun Dec 28 2003 - 08:56:58 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Bob Badour
(Sun Dec 28 2003 - 10:04:56 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Bob Badour
(Sun Dec 28 2003 - 10:08:08 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Sun Dec 28 2003 - 10:28:14 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sun Dec 28 2003 - 15:53:51 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Joe \
(Sun Dec 28 2003 - 19:30:11 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sun Dec 28 2003 - 20:06:56 CET)
Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders
Alfredo Novoa
(Sun Dec 28 2003 - 21:00:37 CET)
Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders
Costin Cozianu
(Sun Dec 28 2003 - 22:58:25 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Paul G. Brown
(Sun Dec 28 2003 - 21:30:25 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Marshall Spight
(Sun Dec 28 2003 - 23:24:09 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Marshall Spight
(Sun Dec 28 2003 - 23:30:02 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Marshall Spight
(Sun Dec 28 2003 - 23:54:35 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Joe \
(Mon Dec 29 2003 - 00:35:36 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Marshall Spight
(Mon Dec 29 2003 - 01:43:52 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Joe \
(Mon Dec 29 2003 - 02:08:59 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Bob Badour
(Mon Dec 29 2003 - 06:11:11 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Bob Badour
(Mon Dec 29 2003 - 06:12:59 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Mon Dec 29 2003 - 06:21:33 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Bob Badour
(Mon Dec 29 2003 - 06:25:17 CET)
Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders
Bob Badour
(Mon Dec 29 2003 - 06:35:34 CET)
Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders
Costin Cozianu
(Mon Dec 29 2003 - 07:59:52 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Marshall Spight
(Mon Dec 29 2003 - 07:07:22 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Mon Dec 29 2003 - 11:36:12 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Costin Cozianu
(Mon Dec 29 2003 - 23:54:52 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 00:57:57 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Marshall Spight
(Mon Dec 29 2003 - 18:06:14 CET)
Re: Microsoft and the two great blunders
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon Dec 29 2003 - 18:07:37 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon Dec 29 2003 - 18:17:09 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Marshall Spight
(Mon Dec 29 2003 - 18:20:15 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Bob Badour
(Mon Dec 29 2003 - 19:51:16 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 03:44:59 CET)
Re: Domain
Marshall Spight
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 04:18:16 CET)
Re: Domain
Marshall Spight
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 04:21:33 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Marshall Spight
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 04:24:32 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Jonathan Leffler
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 08:41:37 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Wed Dec 31 2003 - 07:59:35 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 04:31:32 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 05:12:22 CET)
Re: Domain
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 05:30:56 CET)
Re: Domain
Bob Badour
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 07:23:06 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 07:24:48 CET)
Re: Domain
Joe \
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 07:30:59 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 07:53:37 CET)
Re: Two-valued logic
Jonathan Leffler
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 08:25:51 CET)
Re: Two-valued logic
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 18:07:48 CET)
Re: Domain
Marshall Spight
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 18:36:16 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 18:46:12 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Vadim Tropashko
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 20:19:13 CET)
Re: Domain
Marshall Spight
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 18:47:40 CET)
Re: Domain
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 19:12:26 CET)
Re: Domain
Bob Badour
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 19:47:34 CET)
Re: Domain
Bob Badour
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 19:53:21 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 19:59:33 CET)
Re: Domain
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 20:08:35 CET)
Re: Domain
Joe \
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 20:19:23 CET)
Re: Domain
Marshall Spight
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 20:53:33 CET)
Re: Two-valued logic
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 21:02:21 CET)
Re: Two-valued logic
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 21:24:51 CET)
Re: Two-valued logic
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 22:05:09 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 22:11:27 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 22:17:00 CET)
Re: Domain
Bob Badour
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 23:14:45 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Tue Dec 30 2003 - 23:19:33 CET)
Re: Domain
Christopher Browne
(Wed Dec 31 2003 - 00:55:53 CET)
Re: Domain
Marshall Spight
(Wed Dec 31 2003 - 04:34:08 CET)
Re: Domain
Bob Badour
(Wed Dec 31 2003 - 05:50:17 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Wed Dec 31 2003 - 07:52:51 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Wed Dec 31 2003 - 11:13:58 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Wed Dec 31 2003 - 20:23:07 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Wed Dec 31 2003 - 20:29:58 CET)
Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Bruce Lewis
(Mon Dec 01 2003 - 15:35:24 CET)
Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Trey Walpole
(Mon Dec 01 2003 - 17:55:46 CET)
Is this De-Normalization?
tom dorgan
(Mon Dec 01 2003 - 19:36:23 CET)
Re: Is this De-Normalization?
Joe \
(Mon Dec 01 2003 - 20:39:27 CET)
Re: Is this De-Normalization?
Tom Hester
(Mon Dec 01 2003 - 23:17:45 CET)
Questions about Nested Intervals by Vadim Tropashko one more time
alexzar_nospam_at_zorranlabs.com
(Mon Dec 01 2003 - 21:47:04 CET)
Re: a little help? Functional Dependencies
Mike Sherrill
(Mon Dec 01 2003 - 21:58:31 CET)
Last message date
:
Mon Dec 01 2003 - 00:24:25 CET
Archived on
: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 11:54:26 CEST
10 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
.::
Blogger Home
::
Wiki Home
::
Forum Home
::
Privacy
::
Contact
::.
