Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:53:33 GMT
"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message news:5didnbY3IvfBVWyiRVn-iQ_at_golden.net...
> "Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message
> > If you look at the field of programming languages, the last 30 years
> > has seen a lot of activity, a lot of new ideas, and a lot of advancements
> > in type systems.
> Really? The only real advancement I have seen is in TTM.
> Specifically, how has it advanced?
> Do you honestly think C++ represents an advance in type systems?
I take it from this question that you're thinking I'm thinking C++ and
Java are state-of-the-art in programming languages. They aren't.
(They are state-of-the-art in being popular, though.) I'm more
interested in things like Haskell.
Received on Tue Dec 30 2003 - 20:53:33 CET
Marshall Received on Tue Dec 30 2003 - 20:53:33 CET