Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:14:45 -0500
"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message
> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
> > "Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message
> > news:kIiIb.15973$xX.41122_at_attbi_s02...
> > >
> > > If you look at the field of programming languages, the last 30 years
> > > has seen a lot of activity, a lot of new ideas, and a lot of
> > > in type systems.
> > Really? The only real advancement I have seen is in TTM.
> > Specifically, how has it advanced?
> > Do you honestly think C++ represents an advance in type systems?
> I take it from this question that you're thinking I'm thinking C++ and
> Java are state-of-the-art in programming languages. They aren't.
> (They are state-of-the-art in being popular, though.) I'm more
> interested in things like Haskell.
Then why did you propose Java as a paradigm and mention C++ in your message?
Received on Tue Dec 30 2003 - 23:14:45 CET