Re: relations aren't types?
From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_at_ncs.es>
Date: 29 Dec 2003 09:17:09 -0800
Message-ID: <e4330f45.0312290917.77f88e2e_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 29 Dec 2003 09:17:09 -0800
Message-ID: <e4330f45.0312290917.77f88e2e_at_posting.google.com>
"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message news:<J8ednZnlZMCYJ3KiRVn-tA_at_golden.net>...
> Alpha as an attribute type means the user cannot perform any operations on
> the values, which distinctly limits its utility too; although, not as much
> as omega.
Well, I don't see a lot of utility for them either, but the user still has the IS_ and the TREAT_AS operators.
Regards
Alfredo
Received on Mon Dec 29 2003 - 18:17:09 CET