Re: Can FK be nullable/optional by design?
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:44:25 -0000
"Joe "Nuke Me Xemu" Foster" <joe_at_bftsi0.UUCP> wrote in message
> Did you really mean to claim that ALL non-nullable attributes MUST
> 'logically' be included as part of the primary key?!
Well, not really! I was just throwing in another option - where if the existance of one entity is dependent on another, then you can make the PK of that entity part of a composite key in the dependent entity. It's an alternative to just non nullable foreign keys, where the related column(s) become part of a primary key, rather than just a foreign key. Sorry, I think I need to take my anti-waffle pill, can't seem to put a good explanation together 8-)
> > Otherwise, if the Client could optionally belong to one Group, the
> > relationship would be captured in a link table, as you suggested in B?
> > GroupedClient (PersonID PK/FK, GroupID FK NOT NULL)
> This would avoid the null nonsense until someone does an outer join.
That's true. So which option would you go for?
> Joe Foster <mailto:jlfoster%40znet.com> L. Ron Dullard
> WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above They're
> because my cats have apparently learned to type. take me away,
ha ha! Received on Fri Dec 12 2003 - 15:44:25 CET