Re: relations aren't types?
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_golden.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:24:48 -0500
Message-ID: <XeCdnbxDlZnbh2yiRVn-vA_at_golden.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 01:24:48 -0500
Message-ID: <XeCdnbxDlZnbh2yiRVn-vA_at_golden.net>
"John Jacob" <jingleheimerschmitt_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:72f08f6c.0312291844.48dd11fc_at_posting.google.com...
> > The relation value in the attribute for each tuple is
> > a single value with defined operations. How does that differ from an
> > integer?
>
> Types are not atomic, values are.
How does that answer the question about the difference between a relation value and an integer value? Received on Tue Dec 30 2003 - 07:24:48 CET