Re: relations aren't types?

From: Mikito Harakiri <mikharakiri_at_iahu.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:31:32 -0800
Message-ID: <ps6Ib.13$Oi2.221_at_news.oracle.com>


"John Jacob" <jingleheimerschmitt_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:72f08f6c.0312291844.48dd11fc_at_posting.google.com...
> Types are not atomic, values are.

Given a set of values of the same type, could this set have both atomic and nonatomic values present? Received on Tue Dec 30 2003 - 04:31:32 CET

Original text of this message