Re: relations aren't types?
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 11:53:46 -0800
"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message <news:zfadndtXBIzU4XGiRVn-vA_at_golden.net>...
> "Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message
> > Why not just declare the two
> > cases as identical?
> Why not declare strings and integers identical and avoid all those pesky
> conversions too? Do you see the absurdity?
-- Joe Foster <mailto:jlfoster%40znet.com> On the cans? <http://www.xenu.net/> WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above They're coming to because my cats have apparently learned to type. take me away, ha ha!Received on Fri Dec 26 2003 - 20:53:46 CET