Re: Codd article really that hard to get?
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:17:31 -0500
Message-ID: <4v2dnTLI86J_X0WiRVn-sQ_at_golden.net>
"Amund Trovåg"
<amundAndHereEndethMyName_at_removeINOLIKESPAMYOUSEEtexassibir.com> wrote in
message news:3FD8AFC6.4060103_at_removeINOLIKESPAMYOUSEEtexassibir.com...
>
> Bob Badour wrote:
> > "Amund Trovåg"
> > <amundAndHereEndethMyName_at_removeINOLIKESPAMYOUSEEtexassibir.com> wrote
in
> > message news:3FD84132.3010905_at_removeINOLIKESPAMYOUSEEtexassibir.com...
> >
> >>Jerry Gitomer wrote:
> >>
> >>>Amund Trovåg wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Hi.
> >>>>
> >>>>I am a student looking for Codd's '72 article Relational Completeness
> >>>>in Data Base Sublanguages. My university library says that they are
> >>>>unable to order it from anywhere in the world(!)...umm there's got to
> >>>>be a mistake here. Isn't this article supposed to be read by the
> >>>>entire DB community? Where is it :)
> >>>>
> >>>>Any ideas appreciated.
> >>>>
> >>>>AT
> >>>
> >>>Learn to use Google and you will come to the following:
> >>>
> >>>[Codd1972b]
> >>> Codd, E.F. Relational Completeness of Data Base Sublanguages in
> >>>Data Base Systems. pp. 65-98 in Rustin, Randall J.(ed.). Data Base
> >>>Systems. Courant Computer Symposia Series, vol. 6. Prentice-Hall
> >>>(Englewood Cliffs, NJ: 1972).
> >>
> >>Yes, yes. It has also been republished (that's why I got confused). But
> >>as you can see, I have already posted a sorry for posting post, 6 hours
> >>before your patronizing little note. I made the same conclusions as you
> >>did with your madskillz using google 6 hours ago. Do you then think I
> >>need this info? No? Then what is natural to do? Yes. Yes, exactly.
> >
> > Armund,
> >
> > It frequently takes hours or even days before a usenet post becomes
visible
> > to all readers.
> This I didn't know.
I strongly suspected that contributed to the misunderstanding.
> > answering your question and for suggesting an alternate technique to get
> > more timely answers.
> Depends on the formulations, now doesn't it?
> > If you do not want patronizing little notes, make sure you rtfm and
google
> > before asking for anyone else's help.
> Well, I did, found the correct reference, but made a mistake when
> showing it to my local library. Hence the "nevermind-post".
> Oh, and you do a great job in patronizing as well, but I have read the
> kind of posts you have made before, so I wont make a big thing out of it.
First rule: Don't sweat the small stuff.
Second rule: It's all small stuff.
Cheers,