Oracle FAQ
Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" SRC="http://www.orafaq.net/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?jscript"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <A HREF="http://www.orafaq.net/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?banner=NonSSI;page=01" TARGET="_blank" onMouseOver="window.status='Click here! Support the Oracle FAQ by supporting our sponsors.';return true" onMouseOut="window.status='';return true"> <IMG SRC="http://www.orafaq.net/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?page=01" HEIGHT=60 WIDTH=468 ALT="Support the Oracle FAQ by supporting our sponsors. Click here!" BORDER=0> </A> </NOSCRIPT>
Home
->
Community
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
411 messages
:
Starting
Tue Feb 01 2005 - 00:25:54 CST,
Ending
Mon Feb 28 2005 - 21:58:45 CST
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Re: Charades [Was: RE: Define "flatten database" ?]
Dan
(Tue Feb 01 2005 - 00:25:54 CST)
Re: Charades [Was: RE: Define "flatten database" ?]
Paul
(Tue Feb 01 2005 - 07:30:30 CST)
Re: Charades [Was: RE: Define "flatten database" ?]
DA Morgan
(Tue Feb 01 2005 - 08:48:55 CST)
Re: Charades [Was: RE: Define "flatten database" ?]
Paul
(Tue Feb 01 2005 - 10:30:01 CST)
Re: Charades [Was: RE: Define "flatten database" ?]
DA Morgan
(Wed Feb 02 2005 - 11:15:08 CST)
Re: Charades [Was: RE: Define "flatten database" ?]
Neo
(Tue Feb 01 2005 - 15:47:32 CST)
Re: Charades [Was: RE: Define "flatten database" ?]
Anith Sen
(Tue Feb 01 2005 - 12:44:58 CST)
Re: Charades [Was: RE: Define "flatten database" ?]
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Feb 01 2005 - 20:55:03 CST)
Re: Charades [Was: RE: Define "flatten database" ?]
DBMS_Plumber
(Tue Feb 01 2005 - 23:30:50 CST)
Re: SQL Database design question
saghir.taj_at_gmail.com
(Tue Feb 01 2005 - 05:33:12 CST)
Re: SQL Database design question
William Cleveland
(Sun Feb 06 2005 - 22:23:34 CST)
Re: SQL Database design question
David Cressey
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 07:23:28 CST)
Re: SQL Database design question
Erland Sommarskog
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 16:16:34 CST)
Re: SQL Database design question
David Cressey
(Tue Feb 08 2005 - 07:41:56 CST)
Uneducated Ego-Puffed Idiot, Ignoramus, Troll
Neo
(Tue Feb 01 2005 - 14:08:15 CST)
Re: Uneducated Ego-Puffed Idiot, Ignoramus, Troll
Alan
(Tue Feb 01 2005 - 14:50:39 CST)
Re: Uneducated Ego-Puffed Idiot, Ignoramus, Troll
Gene Wirchenko
(Tue Feb 01 2005 - 15:39:16 CST)
Re: Uneducated Ego-Puffed Idiot, Ignoramus, Troll
Hugo Kornelis
(Tue Feb 01 2005 - 17:18:03 CST)
Re: Uneducated Ego-Puffed Idiot, Ignoramus, Troll
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Feb 02 2005 - 18:36:54 CST)
Re: Uneducated Ego-Puffed Idiot, Ignoramus, Troll
Neo
(Wed Feb 02 2005 - 20:35:13 CST)
Re: Uneducated Ego-Puffed Idiot, Ignoramus, Troll
Alan
(Wed Feb 02 2005 - 21:36:21 CST)
Re: Uneducated Ego-Puffed Idiot, Ignoramus, Troll
Neo
(Sun Feb 20 2005 - 20:36:59 CST)
Re: Question about modeling
Dan
(Tue Feb 01 2005 - 16:52:24 CST)
Re: Question about modeling
David Cressey
(Wed Feb 02 2005 - 08:43:24 CST)
Re: Question about modeling
mathmoi
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 14:09:46 CST)
Re: Question about modeling
David Cressey
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 08:29:25 CST)
Re: Question about modeling
mathmoi
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 10:36:10 CST)
Free T-Shirts
Spam2_at_Sharewareisland.com
(Wed Feb 02 2005 - 11:03:22 CST)
Re: Normalization Question
Marshall Lucas
(Wed Feb 02 2005 - 15:43:22 CST)
Re: Normalization Question
Neo
(Wed Feb 02 2005 - 23:11:06 CST)
Re: Normalization Question
Marshall Lucas
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 09:31:07 CST)
Re: Normalization Question
Neo
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 10:58:32 CST)
Re: Normalization Question
Neo
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 11:01:52 CST)
Views for denomalizing
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:34:40 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 00:34:47 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 06:52:36 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Neo
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 16:48:49 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 17:17:09 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alfredo Novoa
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 08:03:18 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 10:32:01 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alfredo Novoa
(Sat Feb 05 2005 - 15:03:42 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sat Feb 05 2005 - 18:24:22 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 13:04:41 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 13:12:23 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Jonathan Leffler
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 01:18:10 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alfredo Novoa
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 03:14:12 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 20:20:18 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alfredo Novoa
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 03:58:54 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 07:19:09 CST)
Re: Views for demoralizing
Jonathan Leffler
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 00:49:43 CST)
Re: Views for demoralizing
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 10:00:56 CST)
Re: Views for demoralizing
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 19:26:35 CST)
Re: Views for demoralizing
Jonathan Leffler
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 03:14:33 CST)
Re: Views for demoralizing
mikharakiri_nospaum_at_yahoo.com
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 00:10:19 CST)
Re: Views for demoralizing
Alfredo Novoa
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 09:58:05 CST)
Re: Views for demoralizing
Jonathan Leffler
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 21:44:21 CST)
Re: Views for demoralizing
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 09:58:20 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 14:25:16 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alfredo Novoa
(Sat Feb 05 2005 - 15:04:16 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Anith Sen
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 00:57:57 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 07:18:20 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Gene Wirchenko
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 11:23:12 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Anith Sen
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 23:40:06 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Jonathan Leffler
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 01:51:49 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 10:48:53 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
DA Morgan
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 01:55:01 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 07:33:18 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
DA Morgan
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 08:45:27 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 20:29:43 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alan
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 22:18:29 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
David Cressey
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 07:27:26 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alan
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 07:55:04 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
David Cressey
(Sun Feb 06 2005 - 18:18:45 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alfredo Novoa
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 08:00:37 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alan
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 08:27:56 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alfredo Novoa
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 09:15:23 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alan
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 21:30:53 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alfredo Novoa
(Sat Feb 05 2005 - 15:04:42 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Anith Sen
(Sun Feb 06 2005 - 14:37:51 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 10:12:28 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alfredo Novoa
(Sat Feb 05 2005 - 15:03:46 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alfredo Novoa
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 08:03:25 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
David Cressey
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 09:03:26 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
dwolt
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 15:37:02 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alfredo Novoa
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 08:03:08 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 10:53:54 CST)
Re: Views for denomalizing
Alfredo Novoa
(Sat Feb 05 2005 - 15:03:59 CST)
Do you have any sugestion of a good book about modeling ?
mathmoi
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 15:21:14 CST)
Re: Do you have any sugestion of a good book about modeling ?
Mark D Powell
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 09:23:04 CST)
Re: Do you have any sugestion of a good book about modeling ?
mathmoi
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 10:40:51 CST)
Re: Do you have any sugestion of a good book about modeling ?
Mark D Powell
(Sat Feb 05 2005 - 23:18:14 CST)
Re: Do you have any sugestion of a good book about modeling ?
-CELKO-
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 12:50:58 CST)
Re: Do you have any sugestion of a good book about modeling ?
ak_tiredofspam_at_yahoo.com
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 14:46:54 CST)
Re: Do you have any sugestion of a good book about modeling ?
Mike Sherrill
(Tue Feb 08 2005 - 21:14:27 CST)
Re: Do you have any sugestion of a good book about modeling ?
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Sun Feb 06 2005 - 05:31:23 CST)
Re: Relation-valued attributes (again)
x y
(Thu Feb 03 2005 - 20:53:39 CST)
Re: Relation-valued attributes (again)
jingleheimerschmitt_at_hotmail.com
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 02:37:27 CST)
Re: Relation-valued attributes (again)
x y
(Tue Feb 08 2005 - 21:37:40 CST)
Re: Relation-valued attributes (again)
jingleheimerschmitt_at_hotmail.com
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 03:12:58 CST)
Re: Relation-valued attributes (again)
Neo
(Tue Feb 08 2005 - 23:55:03 CST)
Re: Define "flatten database" ?
Dan
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 01:39:40 CST)
Re: Define "flatten database" ?
Jan Hidders
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 08:07:21 CST)
Re: Define "flatten database" ?
Jan Hidders
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 08:29:26 CST)
Re: Define "flatten database" ?
Patrick
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 22:13:37 CST)
Determining database response time
neo
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 10:54:02 CST)
Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 11:58:55 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 12:37:17 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Neo
(Fri Feb 04 2005 - 16:24:35 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sat Feb 05 2005 - 08:36:28 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Sat Feb 05 2005 - 19:56:44 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sat Feb 05 2005 - 20:54:43 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dan
(Sun Feb 06 2005 - 01:53:14 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Roy Hann
(Sun Feb 06 2005 - 05:39:10 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Sun Feb 06 2005 - 09:32:54 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sun Feb 06 2005 - 14:31:04 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alfredo Novoa
(Sat Feb 05 2005 - 15:04:37 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Roy Hann
(Sun Feb 06 2005 - 01:35:09 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Tony Andrews
(Sun Feb 06 2005 - 08:32:22 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alfredo Novoa
(Sun Feb 06 2005 - 09:36:49 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 09:11:33 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 09:52:06 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 10:20:30 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 10:34:27 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 10:54:27 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 11:23:09 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Roy Hann
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 11:49:25 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Sun Feb 06 2005 - 09:36:38 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
(Sun Feb 06 2005 - 10:30:51 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Sun Feb 06 2005 - 13:33:15 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sun Feb 06 2005 - 14:23:52 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 08:50:54 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 00:23:41 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
David Cressey
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 07:19:54 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 07:35:21 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 08:11:31 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
David Cressey
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 14:38:13 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Paul
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 15:55:34 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 09:08:04 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Sun Feb 06 2005 - 15:07:26 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Paul
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 07:29:06 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 07:55:44 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Paul
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 11:42:07 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 13:10:06 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 13:44:02 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 14:22:06 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 20:08:19 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 23:09:20 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Tue Feb 08 2005 - 00:29:19 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
David Cressey
(Tue Feb 08 2005 - 07:52:49 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Tue Feb 08 2005 - 12:52:59 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Feb 08 2005 - 17:33:03 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
David Cressey
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 10:44:10 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 17:01:24 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
David Cressey
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 08:26:36 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 09:19:50 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alfredo Novoa
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 06:07:48 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 22:40:39 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Paul
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 14:16:56 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 15:54:14 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 20:23:43 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
strider5
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 07:57:35 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Paul
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 11:08:33 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
strider5
(Tue Feb 08 2005 - 02:14:19 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Roy Hann
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 05:58:06 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 07:56:05 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 09:09:57 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 09:38:05 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 09:52:21 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Roy Hann
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 13:22:13 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 08:57:58 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Paul
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 07:35:04 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 09:49:09 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Paul
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 10:56:07 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 11:27:58 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 11:40:12 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 12:06:50 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 11:41:48 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Paul
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 12:12:50 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 12:40:35 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dan
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 13:03:55 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 15:25:27 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dan
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 16:57:07 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 18:54:29 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dan
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 21:32:28 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Tue Feb 08 2005 - 08:11:17 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
strider5
(Tue Feb 08 2005 - 02:30:56 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 05:50:11 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Neo
(Sun Feb 06 2005 - 19:38:19 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 08:45:18 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 12:30:32 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 12:51:23 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dan
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 13:11:59 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 13:31:26 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alan
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 18:45:17 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Mon Feb 07 2005 - 20:27:33 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dan
(Tue Feb 08 2005 - 07:12:23 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dan
(Tue Feb 08 2005 - 07:51:28 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
paul c
(Tue Feb 08 2005 - 11:53:31 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dan
(Tue Feb 08 2005 - 13:40:52 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
paul c
(Tue Feb 08 2005 - 15:54:03 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Feb 08 2005 - 18:34:06 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
paul c
(Tue Feb 08 2005 - 23:12:24 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
David Cressey
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 07:11:55 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dan
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 08:09:41 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 09:36:17 CST)
Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 09:00:08 CST)
Re: Charades
Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
(Sat Feb 05 2005 - 11:44:31 CST)
Re: Charades
Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
(Sun Feb 06 2005 - 06:10:21 CST)
Re: Pearson-r in SQL
Paul Mason
(Tue Feb 08 2005 - 13:59:37 CST)
Re: Pearson-r in SQL
-CELKO-
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 08:19:52 CST)
So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 19:52:25 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Dan
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 20:07:21 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 20:26:17 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Feb 09 2005 - 20:42:21 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Jan Hidders
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 10:12:10 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
David Cressey
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 01:17:05 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
strider5
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 02:42:20 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Alfredo Novoa
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 05:45:24 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 12:29:06 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
paul c
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 12:58:45 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 13:11:02 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
paul c
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 14:19:01 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 15:53:17 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
paul c
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 16:04:18 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 16:45:26 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
paul c
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 19:09:09 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Paul
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 04:29:25 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Dan
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 15:39:00 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Jan Hidders
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 10:24:34 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Paul
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 14:30:57 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Jan Hidders
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 04:19:51 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Paul
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 05:48:33 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Jan Hidders
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 08:12:51 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Dan
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 16:02:29 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Jan Hidders
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 04:58:13 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
paul c
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 14:39:35 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 15:57:56 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 13:02:22 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 13:15:24 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 15:28:45 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Jan Hidders
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 11:40:51 CST)
Relational lattice
Vadim Tropashko
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 10:28:38 CST)
Re: Relational lattice
Jan Hidders
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 12:10:40 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
David Cressey
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 14:39:51 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 16:10:29 CST)
Re: So let me get this right:
Christopher Browne
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 21:19:10 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
David Cressey
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 08:57:44 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Jan Hidders
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 12:00:17 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
David Cressey
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 06:28:55 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Jan Hidders
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 08:41:09 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
David Cressey
(Mon Feb 14 2005 - 07:17:01 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Mon Feb 14 2005 - 11:52:15 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Jan Hidders
(Mon Feb 14 2005 - 16:36:33 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Mon Feb 14 2005 - 17:29:29 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Feb 14 2005 - 17:50:03 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
David Cressey
(Tue Feb 15 2005 - 09:02:47 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
David Cressey
(Tue Feb 15 2005 - 08:38:13 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
David Cressey
(Thu Feb 17 2005 - 09:38:22 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Thu Feb 17 2005 - 13:07:03 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 17:46:13 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 18:52:48 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 02:02:02 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Alfredo Novoa
(Sat Feb 12 2005 - 06:08:58 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
DBMS_Plumber
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 13:05:06 CST)
Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Thu Feb 10 2005 - 21:19:50 CST)
Representation for Heterogeneous Attribute Set
robertbrown1971_at_yahoo.com
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 00:06:41 CST)
Re: Representation for Heterogeneous Attribute Set
David Cressey
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 07:48:51 CST)
RDBMS Challenges (was: Representation for Heterogeneous Attribute Set)
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 13:16:33 CST)
Re: Representation for Heterogeneous Attribute Set
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 13:33:24 CST)
Re: Representation for Heterogeneous Attribute Set
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 09:12:03 CST)
Re: Representation for Heterogeneous Attribute Set
-CELKO-
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 10:30:07 CST)
Re: Representation for Heterogeneous Attribute Set
robertbrown1971_at_yahoo.com
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 11:05:53 CST)
Re: Representation for Heterogeneous Attribute Set
Carl Federl
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 16:00:13 CST)
Re: Representation for Heterogeneous Attribute Set
--CELKO--
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 16:56:13 CST)
Re: Representation for Heterogeneous Attribute Set
Neo
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 13:41:36 CST)
Re: Representation for Heterogeneous Attribute Set
louis
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 15:36:36 CST)
Re: Representation for Heterogeneous Attribute Set
louis
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 16:09:18 CST)
Re: Representation for Heterogeneous Attribute Set
Erland Sommarskog
(Fri Feb 11 2005 - 17:37:34 CST)
Current Glossary & definition of Relation
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sun Feb 13 2005 - 15:19:18 CST)
Re: Current Glossary & definition of Relation
Amit
(Mon Feb 14 2005 - 11:55:18 CST)
Re: Current Glossary & definition of Relation
mikharakiri_nospaum_at_yahoo.com
(Tue Feb 15 2005 - 11:16:13 CST)
Database distant access
Hans
(Tue Feb 15 2005 - 03:51:20 CST)
Re: Database distant access
Mark D Powell
(Wed Feb 16 2005 - 09:15:41 CST)
Cardinality "highly unusual"
Matt M
(Tue Feb 15 2005 - 04:11:31 CST)
Re: Cardinality "highly unusual"
Hugo Kornelis
(Tue Feb 15 2005 - 04:34:01 CST)
Re: Cardinality "highly unusual"
Matt M
(Tue Feb 15 2005 - 06:33:36 CST)
Re: Cardinality "highly unusual"
Matt M
(Tue Feb 15 2005 - 06:36:21 CST)
Re: Cardinality "highly unusual"
Hugo Kornelis
(Tue Feb 15 2005 - 09:42:51 CST)
Re: Cardinality "highly unusual"
Matt M
(Wed Feb 16 2005 - 01:35:24 CST)
Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Feb 15 2005 - 16:40:52 CST)
Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Antonio Martinez
(Wed Feb 16 2005 - 12:21:09 CST)
Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Feb 16 2005 - 12:53:12 CST)
Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Paul
(Wed Feb 16 2005 - 18:39:00 CST)
Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Feb 16 2005 - 19:21:54 CST)
Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Vadim Tropashko
(Wed Feb 16 2005 - 19:59:04 CST)
Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Jan Hidders
(Thu Feb 17 2005 - 16:27:40 CST)
What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Feb 17 2005 - 17:15:05 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Jan Hidders
(Thu Feb 17 2005 - 17:30:52 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Feb 17 2005 - 18:12:27 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
David Cressey
(Fri Feb 18 2005 - 07:40:10 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Jan Hidders
(Fri Feb 18 2005 - 16:33:15 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Feb 18 2005 - 16:54:24 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Jan Hidders
(Fri Feb 18 2005 - 17:19:11 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Vadim Tropashko
(Fri Feb 18 2005 - 19:16:17 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Feb 18 2005 - 19:47:26 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Vadim Tropashko
(Fri Feb 18 2005 - 20:05:11 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sat Feb 19 2005 - 22:11:35 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Jan Hidders
(Sun Feb 20 2005 - 06:57:57 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sun Feb 20 2005 - 12:52:09 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Jan Hidders
(Sun Feb 20 2005 - 17:48:36 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Mon Feb 21 2005 - 21:53:19 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Dan
(Sun Feb 20 2005 - 21:58:20 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Paul
(Thu Feb 17 2005 - 17:49:14 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Feb 17 2005 - 18:30:56 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Paul
(Fri Feb 18 2005 - 03:15:04 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Feb 18 2005 - 11:52:27 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Paul
(Fri Feb 18 2005 - 13:08:03 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Feb 18 2005 - 13:36:29 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Paul
(Sat Feb 19 2005 - 06:02:49 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
mikharakiri_nospaum_at_yahoo.com
(Sat Feb 19 2005 - 12:02:27 CST)
Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Feb 22 2005 - 19:04:39 CST)
DTDs, specialized DTDs and XML Schema
Jan Hidders
(Wed Feb 23 2005 - 14:28:18 CST)
User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE!
news.hp.com
(Wed Feb 16 2005 - 09:05:07 CST)
Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE!
John
(Wed Feb 16 2005 - 09:48:34 CST)
Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE!
Mike Sherrill
(Wed Feb 16 2005 - 09:47:56 CST)
Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE!
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Feb 16 2005 - 10:10:40 CST)
Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE!
David Cressey
(Wed Feb 16 2005 - 14:42:07 CST)
Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE!
Alan
(Wed Feb 16 2005 - 15:14:56 CST)
Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE!
-CELKO-
(Thu Feb 17 2005 - 09:07:32 CST)
Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE!
John
(Thu Feb 17 2005 - 09:58:02 CST)
Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE!
-CELKO-
(Fri Feb 18 2005 - 12:41:22 CST)
Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE!
Mike Sherrill
(Sat Feb 19 2005 - 05:27:20 CST)
Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE!
Mark D Powell
(Tue Feb 22 2005 - 09:12:31 CST)
Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE!
DA Morgan
(Tue Feb 22 2005 - 12:51:07 CST)
Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE!
Alan
(Tue Feb 22 2005 - 13:49:04 CST)
Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE!
Mark.Powell_at_eds.com
(Fri Feb 25 2005 - 08:30:38 CST)
Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE!
DA Morgan
(Fri Feb 25 2005 - 09:58:12 CST)
Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE!
Eric Bohlman
(Wed Feb 23 2005 - 12:59:37 CST)
Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE!
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Feb 23 2005 - 13:21:04 CST)
Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE!
Alan
(Wed Feb 23 2005 - 14:18:07 CST)
Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE!
Mark.Powell_at_eds.com
(Fri Feb 25 2005 - 08:20:19 CST)
Relation Definition
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Feb 16 2005 - 19:00:47 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Frank Hamersley
(Thu Feb 17 2005 - 05:56:52 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Thu Feb 17 2005 - 07:20:48 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Jan Hidders
(Thu Feb 17 2005 - 16:02:43 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
dwolt
(Thu Feb 17 2005 - 18:27:42 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Jan Hidders
(Fri Feb 18 2005 - 16:13:23 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Alfredo Novoa
(Fri Feb 18 2005 - 02:01:05 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Jan Hidders
(Fri Feb 18 2005 - 15:33:50 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon Feb 21 2005 - 09:12:58 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Jan Hidders
(Mon Feb 21 2005 - 16:39:41 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Anith Sen
(Sat Feb 19 2005 - 18:17:30 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Jan Hidders
(Sun Feb 20 2005 - 05:22:29 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Anith Sen
(Sun Feb 20 2005 - 23:33:57 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Jan Hidders
(Mon Feb 21 2005 - 16:26:29 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Anith Sen
(Mon Feb 21 2005 - 20:14:53 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Mon Feb 21 2005 - 21:36:51 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Jan Hidders
(Tue Feb 22 2005 - 14:13:03 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Anith Sen
(Tue Feb 22 2005 - 20:31:33 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Jan Hidders
(Wed Feb 23 2005 - 12:36:42 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Feb 23 2005 - 13:17:00 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Jan Hidders
(Wed Feb 23 2005 - 14:40:01 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon Feb 21 2005 - 09:15:07 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon Feb 21 2005 - 10:02:24 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Jan Hidders
(Mon Feb 21 2005 - 16:18:52 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Jan Hidders
(Mon Feb 21 2005 - 16:47:17 CST)
Re: Relation Definition
Roy Hann
(Tue Feb 22 2005 - 02:53:05 CST)
can two stored procedures in same transaction cause deadlock
huanchhspfree_at_yahoo.com
(Thu Feb 17 2005 - 02:06:57 CST)
Re: can two stored procedures in same transaction cause deadlock
Benjamin Gufler
(Thu Feb 17 2005 - 03:21:27 CST)
Re: can two stored procedures in same transaction cause deadlock
Frank Hamersley
(Thu Feb 17 2005 - 05:42:30 CST)
Re: can two stored procedures in same transaction cause deadlock
gnuoytr_at_rcn.com
(Sat Feb 19 2005 - 16:51:05 CST)
space filling curves
shahbazc_at_gmail.com
(Fri Feb 18 2005 - 03:59:09 CST)
Let's Help Each Other Get Rich Quick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
dhargan_at_santel.net
(Sat Feb 19 2005 - 14:12:44 CST)
Problem with Nested Sets
loufoque
(Tue Feb 22 2005 - 12:09:23 CST)
Re: Problem with Nested Sets
Neo
(Tue Feb 22 2005 - 13:17:11 CST)
Re: Problem with Nested Sets
loufoque
(Wed Feb 23 2005 - 17:49:16 CST)
Re: Problem with Nested Sets
Neo
(Fri Feb 25 2005 - 15:17:39 CST)
Re: Problem with Nested Sets
-CELKO-
(Wed Feb 23 2005 - 12:28:02 CST)
Re: Problem with Nested Sets
loufoque
(Wed Feb 23 2005 - 17:48:27 CST)
Re: Problem with Nested Sets
-CELKO-
(Thu Feb 24 2005 - 09:20:16 CST)
not enough rows, too many rows, and joins
bugbear
(Wed Feb 23 2005 - 08:17:43 CST)
Re: not enough rows, too many rows, and joins
ford_desperado_at_yahoo.com
(Wed Feb 23 2005 - 10:50:18 CST)
Re: not enough rows, too many rows, and joins
Roy Hann
(Wed Feb 23 2005 - 11:02:53 CST)
Re: not enough rows, too many rows, and joins
ford_desperado_at_yahoo.com
(Wed Feb 23 2005 - 13:15:34 CST)
Re: not enough rows, too many rows, and joins
Paul
(Wed Feb 23 2005 - 14:37:38 CST)
Re: not enough rows, too many rows, and joins
bugbear
(Thu Feb 24 2005 - 03:58:38 CST)
Re: not enough rows, too many rows, and joins
Roy Hann
(Wed Feb 23 2005 - 14:52:14 CST)
Re: not enough rows, too many rows, and joins
David Cressey
(Thu Feb 24 2005 - 12:27:49 CST)
Re: not enough rows, too many rows, and joins
David Cressey
(Thu Feb 24 2005 - 13:35:09 CST)
Re: not enough rows, too many rows, and joins
Neo
(Wed Feb 23 2005 - 12:20:35 CST)
Re: not enough rows, too many rows, and joins
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Feb 23 2005 - 12:40:17 CST)
Re: not enough rows, too many rows, and joins
bugbear
(Thu Feb 24 2005 - 05:29:42 CST)
need some help
jimi_xyz_at_hotmail.com
(Thu Feb 24 2005 - 03:13:54 CST)
Re: need some help
Jan Hidders
(Thu Feb 24 2005 - 16:07:09 CST)
Re: need some help
paul c
(Fri Feb 25 2005 - 15:35:13 CST)
Create new database
vijayshri_gosavi_at_yahoo.co.in
(Sat Feb 26 2005 - 02:31:59 CST)
Re: Create new database
-CELKO-
(Sun Feb 27 2005 - 08:03:27 CST)
Re: Sourcing Metadata for Database Independence
Nolan
(Sun Feb 27 2005 - 13:37:37 CST)
"thou shalt not conflate meta-data with data"
Nolan
(Sun Feb 27 2005 - 14:16:38 CST)
Re: "thou shalt not conflate meta-data with data"
-CELKO-
(Sun Feb 27 2005 - 14:43:06 CST)
Re: "thou shalt not conflate meta-data with data"
Neo
(Sun Feb 27 2005 - 15:49:51 CST)
Re: "thou shalt not conflate meta-data with data"
DA Morgan
(Sun Feb 27 2005 - 21:41:31 CST)
Re: "thou shalt not conflate meta-data with data"
Neo
(Mon Feb 28 2005 - 13:30:59 CST)
Re: "thou shalt not conflate meta-data with data"
frosty
(Mon Feb 28 2005 - 16:29:05 CST)
Re: "thou shalt not conflate meta-data with data"
Neo
(Mon Feb 28 2005 - 17:03:55 CST)
Re: "thou shalt not conflate meta-data with data"
-CELKO-
(Mon Feb 28 2005 - 19:24:41 CST)
Re: "thou shalt not conflate meta-data with data"
Neo
(Mon Feb 28 2005 - 20:09:03 CST)
Modelling Diary Events (with XDb3)
Neo
(Mon Feb 28 2005 - 15:05:32 CST)
Re: Modelling Diary Events (with XDb3)
Lee Fesperman
(Mon Feb 28 2005 - 15:37:46 CST)
Theory Question--Two tables relating in more than one way?
psandler70_at_hotmail.com
(Mon Feb 28 2005 - 21:07:15 CST)
Re: Theory Question--Two tables relating in more than one way?
Neo
(Mon Feb 28 2005 - 21:58:45 CST)
Last message date
:
Mon Feb 28 2005 - 21:58:45 CST
Archived on
: Mon Feb 28 2005 - 23:02:02 CST
411 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
