Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
From: Mikito Harakiri <mikharakiri_at_iahu.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:42:21 -0800
Message-ID: <K2AOd.37$Pm2.90_at_news.oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:42:21 -0800
Message-ID: <K2AOd.37$Pm2.90_at_news.oracle.com>
"DBMS_Plumber" <paul_geoffrey_brown_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1108000345.920684.68440_at_f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Codd said (something like) "relational valued (ie. non-atomic) values
> in attributes not OK"
> Date et. al. said: "Relational value attributes OK."
Yes, but being too concerned with what one or the other authority said about couple of issues (among many many others) doesn't look like genuine scientific attitude as well. Perhaps having your own agenda might help. Received on Thu Feb 10 2005 - 03:42:21 CET