Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_novoa_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:45:18 +0100
Message-ID: <onve01p2hshcdak9i9smi24qf0eabptgt6_at_4ax.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:45:18 +0100
Message-ID: <onve01p2hshcdak9i9smi24qf0eabptgt6_at_4ax.com>
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:58:55 -0600, "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.comREMOVE> wrote:
>Now, with the redefinition of 1NF at the core of relational theory
>development, because these NF2 products work exclusively with functions, a
>subset of all relations, they are necessarily in 1NF
No, they are not in 1NF because they are not relational.
Regards Received on Mon Feb 07 2005 - 15:45:18 CET