Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_novoa_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:52:21 +0100
Message-ID: <7dck01tihgv41i6ffkt6v8a3ol8e63s8po_at_4ax.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:52:21 +0100
Message-ID: <7dck01tihgv41i6ffkt6v8a3ol8e63s8po_at_4ax.com>
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 10:38:05 -0500, "Alan" <alan_at_erols.com> wrote:
>I don't know. I cite sources, and you repeatedly cite opinion and apocryphal
>information even after being asked to cite sources.
We cited the sources more than once.
http://www.aw-bc.com/catalog/academic/product/0,4096,0321197844,00.html http://www.dbdebunk.com/page/page/629796.htm
They are a lot more confidable than your second class reference.
> I am well-employed in
>the field, and have created successful and award-winning projects.
Completely irrelevant.
>I know what I know is correct
It seems that it is not possible to reason with you.
Regards Received on Wed Feb 09 2005 - 16:52:21 CET