Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
From: David Cressey <david.cressey_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:38:13 GMT
Message-ID: <VkQNd.4152$oO.3111_at_newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:38:13 GMT
Message-ID: <VkQNd.4152$oO.3111_at_newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>
"Tom Ivar Helbekkmo" <tih+nr_at_eunetnorge.no> wrote in message
news:86k6pkzch8.fsf_at_athene.hamartun.priv.no...
> "David Cressey" <david.cressey_at_earthlink.net> writes:
>
> > I understand you to be saying that an atomic value can be a relvar,
> > provided that the relational engine is unaware that this is the
> > case. Or am I misconstruing your remarks?
>
> That's exactly what I was saying, yes.
This is the equivalent, IMO, of asking "who shaves the barber?" Received on Mon Feb 07 2005 - 21:38:13 CET