| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads
Therefore, I think this extension is a model
> that is separate and discernable one, not one that "redefines" and
> supercedes the original. If I understand you Dawn, this is the point you
> are making. Don't redefine 1NF, call Date's model something else.
>
> Everyone won't agree with this particular opinion of course. I can accept
> that.
>
> - Dan
Well, I certainly agree. I am relieved that there is someone who can provide a lucid explanation of the situtation. Received on Sun Feb 06 2005 - 09:32:54 CST
![]() |
![]() |