Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...)
From: DBMS_Plumber <paul_geoffrey_brown_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 10 Feb 2005 11:15:24 -0800
Message-ID: <1108062924.338198.182550_at_f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Date: 10 Feb 2005 11:15:24 -0800
Message-ID: <1108062924.338198.182550_at_f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Touche!
And I'd also say that this fulfills the first challenge too. I mean, they don't say "Cool!", but they give some kind of implied OK by writing a book about it.
Although it's kind of strange that an extension which implies the necessity of certain relations (the relation of all chronons) falls within the bounds of "correct interpretation", where (say) domains without an equality operator do not. Received on Thu Feb 10 2005 - 20:15:24 CET