Home
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
3 messages
:
Starting
Sat Feb 01 2003 - 22:23:11 CET,
Ending
Sat Feb 01 2003 - 01:23:18 CET
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Re: MS Northwind DB Theory
Barry
(Sat Feb 01 2003 - 01:23:18 CET)
Re: double linked list
--CELKO--
(Sat Feb 01 2003 - 22:23:11 CET)
Re: double linked list
DA Morgan
(Sat Feb 01 2003 - 22:36:16 CET)
Re: double linked list
Mikito Harakiri
(Sun Feb 02 2003 - 06:51:40 CET)
Re: double linked list
DA Morgan
(Sun Feb 02 2003 - 23:09:21 CET)
Re: double linked list
--CELKO--
(Mon Feb 03 2003 - 01:54:59 CET)
Re: double linked list
Jim Kennedy
(Mon Feb 03 2003 - 02:50:21 CET)
Re: double linked list
DA Morgan
(Mon Feb 03 2003 - 02:59:58 CET)
Re: double linked list
Galen Boyer
(Mon Feb 03 2003 - 04:30:19 CET)
Re: double linked list
Juergen
(Mon Feb 03 2003 - 09:54:31 CET)
Re: double linked list
DA Morgan
(Mon Feb 03 2003 - 17:31:49 CET)
Re: double linked list
--CELKO--
(Mon Feb 03 2003 - 23:09:03 CET)
Re: double linked list
--CELKO--
(Mon Feb 03 2003 - 23:17:35 CET)
Re: double linked list
DA Morgan
(Mon Feb 03 2003 - 23:19:08 CET)
Re: Bizarre Many-toMany relationship issue
Steve Kass
(Tue Feb 04 2003 - 02:17:47 CET)
Re: double linked list
--CELKO--
(Wed Feb 05 2003 - 03:49:04 CET)
Re: double linked list
Richard Foote
(Wed Feb 05 2003 - 13:08:44 CET)
Re: double linked list
DA Morgan
(Wed Feb 05 2003 - 18:16:50 CET)
Re: double linked list
DA Morgan
(Wed Feb 05 2003 - 18:24:36 CET)
Re: double linked list
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Feb 05 2003 - 19:40:38 CET)
Re: double linked list
--CELKO--
(Thu Feb 06 2003 - 01:38:53 CET)
Re: double linked list
DA Morgan
(Thu Feb 06 2003 - 02:16:32 CET)
Re: double linked list
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Feb 06 2003 - 02:36:46 CET)
Re: double linked list
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Feb 06 2003 - 03:08:08 CET)
Re: double linked list
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Feb 06 2003 - 03:11:41 CET)
Re: double linked list
Ed Prochak
(Thu Feb 06 2003 - 06:10:04 CET)
Re: double linked list
DA Morgan
(Thu Feb 06 2003 - 06:33:25 CET)
Re: Creating a Trouble Ticket
stu
(Thu Feb 06 2003 - 10:19:37 CET)
Re: Bizarre Many-toMany relationship issue
Derek
(Thu Feb 06 2003 - 18:46:25 CET)
Re: Materials for an Advanced Database course
akmal _at_ city
(Thu Feb 06 2003 - 18:53:14 CET)
Re: Bizarre Many-toMany relationship issue
Steve Kass
(Thu Feb 06 2003 - 23:29:26 CET)
Re: Hierarchical data
Stéphane Desnault
(Sat Feb 08 2003 - 11:38:58 CET)
Re: Help with our Search Engine
Art Pollard
(Sun Feb 09 2003 - 02:02:13 CET)
Re: Help with our Search Engine
Trevor Jenkins
(Sun Feb 09 2003 - 01:54:11 CET)
Re: Hierarchical data
--CELKO--
(Sun Feb 09 2003 - 20:58:26 CET)
Re: Creating a Trouble Ticket
--CELKO--
(Mon Feb 10 2003 - 03:01:58 CET)
Re: double linked list
--CELKO--
(Mon Feb 10 2003 - 03:08:47 CET)
Re: double linked list
--CELKO--
(Mon Feb 10 2003 - 03:35:53 CET)
Re: Help with our Search Engine
--CELKO--
(Mon Feb 10 2003 - 03:43:31 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
Heinz Huber
(Mon Feb 10 2003 - 08:52:22 CET)
Re: Many to Many Select???
Heinz Huber
(Mon Feb 10 2003 - 08:58:57 CET)
Re: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Anton Versteeg
(Mon Feb 10 2003 - 11:02:50 CET)
Re: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon Feb 10 2003 - 14:44:18 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
Alan Gutierrez
(Mon Feb 10 2003 - 15:46:21 CET)
Re: Help with our Search Engine
Robert Klemme
(Mon Feb 10 2003 - 15:54:21 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
stu
(Mon Feb 10 2003 - 17:05:27 CET)
Re: double linked list
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Feb 10 2003 - 18:05:50 CET)
Re: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
David Cressey
(Mon Feb 10 2003 - 18:54:59 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
Alan Gutierrez
(Mon Feb 10 2003 - 19:30:20 CET)
Re: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Feb 10 2003 - 20:14:16 CET)
Re: Storing Data in a Standard Format or not
--CELKO--
(Tue Feb 11 2003 - 00:14:40 CET)
Re: tree model data
--CELKO--
(Tue Feb 11 2003 - 00:15:46 CET)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
--CELKO--
(Tue Feb 11 2003 - 00:18:46 CET)
Re: tree model data
Daniel Dudley
(Tue Feb 11 2003 - 01:50:28 CET)
Re: tree model data
Alan Gutierrez
(Tue Feb 11 2003 - 03:20:26 CET)
Re: Question: modelling relationship's attributes in ERWIN
Jerry Gitomer
(Tue Feb 11 2003 - 04:25:22 CET)
(no subject)
The Oyster
(Tue Feb 11 2003 - 09:49:22 CET)
Re: Re:
Damjan S. Vujnovic
(Tue Feb 11 2003 - 10:19:07 CET)
Re: Re:
Paul Vernon
(Tue Feb 11 2003 - 10:54:54 CET)
Re: tree model data
Daniel Dudley
(Tue Feb 11 2003 - 04:41:24 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
stu
(Tue Feb 11 2003 - 10:41:10 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
Alan Gutierrez
(Tue Feb 11 2003 - 16:15:48 CET)
Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Amund Trovåg
(Tue Feb 11 2003 - 11:09:20 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Feb 11 2003 - 11:58:09 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
stu
(Tue Feb 11 2003 - 16:45:06 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
Alan Gutierrez
(Wed Feb 12 2003 - 01:09:33 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
B. Hawes
(Tue Feb 11 2003 - 17:37:09 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
Pablo Sanchez
(Wed Feb 12 2003 - 01:20:52 CET)
Re: Can anyone help me??
Jason W. Paul
(Wed Feb 12 2003 - 04:00:04 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
Jason W. Paul
(Wed Feb 12 2003 - 04:53:01 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
Jason W. Paul
(Wed Feb 12 2003 - 04:56:47 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
Pablo Sanchez
(Wed Feb 12 2003 - 05:15:07 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
Pablo Sanchez
(Wed Feb 12 2003 - 05:17:45 CET)
Re: double linked list
--CELKO--
(Wed Feb 12 2003 - 06:01:28 CET)
Re: Re:
Daniel S. Guntermann
(Wed Feb 12 2003 - 06:18:52 CET)
Re: double linked list
Galen Boyer
(Wed Feb 12 2003 - 06:19:25 CET)
Re: double linked list
Galen Boyer
(Wed Feb 12 2003 - 06:26:18 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
stu
(Wed Feb 12 2003 - 10:11:51 CET)
Re: double linked list
Paul Vernon
(Wed Feb 12 2003 - 11:36:02 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
Pablo Sanchez
(Wed Feb 12 2003 - 16:38:48 CET)
Re: double linked list
Ed Prochak
(Wed Feb 12 2003 - 20:08:22 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
Larry Coon
(Wed Feb 12 2003 - 20:00:15 CET)
subquery unnesting (was: double linked list)
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Feb 12 2003 - 21:49:11 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
Pablo Sanchez
(Wed Feb 12 2003 - 22:02:18 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Wed Feb 12 2003 - 22:28:59 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 00:03:20 CET)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
Stéphane Desnault
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 07:10:31 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 12:27:51 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Anton Versteeg
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 13:36:20 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 14:32:09 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 21:07:02 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 23:37:18 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 23:45:04 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 14:51:40 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 18:33:52 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 11:54:30 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 14:17:44 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 14:27:42 CET)
Re: modelling history in a database
Jan Marten Visser
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 14:28:33 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Alfredo Novoa
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 14:52:04 CET)
Re: relational databases
wombat
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 15:31:49 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 17:39:07 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Costin Cozianu
(Mon Feb 17 2003 - 18:53:53 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 18:34:19 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 18:36:49 CET)
Re: relational databases
Paul Vernon
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 18:23:09 CET)
Re: modelling history in a database
Jason
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 19:22:27 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 21:37:11 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 21:47:40 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 23:01:11 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 00:21:30 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 00:23:48 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 00:28:12 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 00:23:14 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 00:24:15 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
D Guntermann
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 00:14:54 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 00:47:32 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 01:28:15 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 01:54:15 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 02:19:38 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 02:48:53 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 02:57:14 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 03:18:42 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 03:45:21 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 06:00:33 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 06:13:14 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 06:31:35 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 06:49:10 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
Heinz Huber
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 09:14:54 CET)
Re: modelling history in a database
stu
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 10:23:31 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 10:31:03 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
Saul Margolis
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 11:08:00 CET)
Re: modelling history in a database
Anton Versteeg
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 11:30:09 CET)
Re: modelling history in a database
Richard Wheeldon
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 12:16:45 CET)
Re: modelling history in a database
stu
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 12:39:19 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
stu
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 12:41:28 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 13:07:36 CET)
Re: modelling history in a database
Paul Vernon
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 13:08:22 CET)
Re: modelling history in a database
Alan Gutierrez
(Sat Feb 15 2003 - 03:50:14 CET)
Re: modelling history in a database
Jan Marten Visser
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 14:03:02 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 14:57:38 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
Pablo Sanchez
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 16:53:43 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
Alan Gutierrez
(Sat Feb 15 2003 - 03:48:33 CET)
Re: modelling history in a database
Jason
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 17:57:48 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 20:06:28 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 20:38:35 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 21:25:32 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 22:05:21 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Feb 14 2003 - 23:55:21 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Sat Feb 15 2003 - 01:45:55 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Sat Feb 15 2003 - 03:10:10 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Sat Feb 15 2003 - 03:15:45 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Daniel S. Guntermann
(Sat Feb 15 2003 - 07:27:40 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sat Feb 15 2003 - 08:14:05 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Sat Feb 15 2003 - 10:13:53 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sat Feb 15 2003 - 12:19:00 CET)
Re: Generate Random SQL...
Mike Sherrill
(Sat Feb 15 2003 - 14:38:03 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Sat Feb 15 2003 - 13:29:32 CET)
Re: modelling history in a database
Paul Vernon
(Sat Feb 15 2003 - 15:01:23 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Sat Feb 15 2003 - 18:11:49 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sat Feb 15 2003 - 18:43:17 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sat Feb 15 2003 - 18:53:17 CET)
Re: modelling history in a database
Paul Vernon
(Sat Feb 15 2003 - 19:34:48 CET)
Re: modelling history in a database
Alan Gutierrez
(Sun Feb 16 2003 - 04:41:55 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Sat Feb 15 2003 - 20:26:36 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:51:46 CET)
Re: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Sat Feb 15 2003 - 23:29:48 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sun Feb 16 2003 - 01:27:16 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Sun Feb 16 2003 - 11:53:31 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Sun Feb 16 2003 - 18:57:38 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Sun Feb 16 2003 - 19:34:11 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Sun Feb 16 2003 - 19:46:24 CET)
Re: Generate Random SQL...
--CELKO--
(Sun Feb 16 2003 - 19:57:23 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul
(Mon Feb 17 2003 - 12:30:12 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Feb 17 2003 - 21:03:57 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 00:22:11 CET)
Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bernard Peek
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 00:58:37 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 01:26:10 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 04:32:18 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bernard Peek
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 14:08:54 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 22:44:13 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Steve Kass
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 23:10:10 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Steve Kass
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 23:20:25 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 00:42:26 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 04:19:12 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 04:35:50 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 05:09:41 CET)
Re: NextNumbers Tables
Daryl Richter
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 16:39:29 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 18:50:50 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 22:30:06 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 22:43:45 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Alfredo Novoa
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 23:08:48 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 23:24:42 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 23:27:49 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 23:32:23 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 23:44:17 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 00:01:29 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bernard Peek
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 00:16:11 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 00:30:03 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
D Guntermann
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 00:17:09 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 00:43:50 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Steve Kass
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 02:00:15 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 02:17:46 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 03:55:14 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 04:02:42 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 04:34:21 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 04:44:05 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 04:46:34 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 05:04:23 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jonathan Leffler
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 07:38:18 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 08:28:44 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Steve Kass
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 09:25:34 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bernard Peek
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 18:37:38 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 19:35:08 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 11:38:04 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 18:29:18 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Thu Feb 20 2003 - 03:03:36 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Thu Feb 20 2003 - 03:13:48 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Thu Feb 20 2003 - 04:42:39 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Steve Kass
(Thu Feb 20 2003 - 11:00:40 CET)
Re: Relational/hierarchical data problem
Will
(Thu Feb 20 2003 - 12:53:46 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Thu Feb 20 2003 - 12:48:53 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Thu Feb 20 2003 - 14:11:17 CET)
Re: Extracting Parent Model from Nested Sets Model
--CELKO--
(Fri Feb 21 2003 - 01:56:27 CET)
Re: Checking normalisation
Guillermo Labatte
(Fri Feb 21 2003 - 04:57:58 CET)
Re: Checking normalisation
Jason W. Paul
(Fri Feb 21 2003 - 05:14:22 CET)
Re: Relational/hierarchical data problem
Bob Badour
(Fri Feb 21 2003 - 07:56:22 CET)
Re: The Logical Data Model & Domains
Bob Badour
(Fri Feb 21 2003 - 07:59:22 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Fri Feb 21 2003 - 08:13:20 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Fri Feb 21 2003 - 08:16:49 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Fri Feb 21 2003 - 08:21:22 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Fri Feb 21 2003 - 08:41:55 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Fri Feb 21 2003 - 09:04:31 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Steve Kass
(Fri Feb 21 2003 - 16:54:42 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Feb 21 2003 - 20:32:02 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
--CELKO--
(Fri Feb 21 2003 - 23:56:29 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Alfredo Novoa
(Sat Feb 22 2003 - 00:52:04 CET)
Re: Relational/hierarchical data problem
Neo555
(Fri Feb 21 2003 - 18:49:10 CET)
Re: Relational/hierarchical data problem
Neo555
(Sat Feb 22 2003 - 01:31:09 CET)
Re: Re:
Gianluca Hotz
(Fri Feb 21 2003 - 13:57:56 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Sat Feb 22 2003 - 02:07:13 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Sat Feb 22 2003 - 02:14:39 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Sat Feb 22 2003 - 02:50:21 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Steve Kass
(Sat Feb 22 2003 - 06:49:35 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
--CELKO--
(Sat Feb 22 2003 - 20:06:58 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Sat Feb 22 2003 - 20:22:56 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Sat Feb 22 2003 - 20:42:02 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Steve Kass
(Sat Feb 22 2003 - 21:29:59 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bernard Peek
(Sun Feb 23 2003 - 00:54:41 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bernard Peek
(Sun Feb 23 2003 - 01:06:48 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Sun Feb 23 2003 - 04:25:22 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Sun Feb 23 2003 - 04:30:43 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
--CELKO--
(Sun Feb 23 2003 - 17:33:28 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bernard Peek
(Sun Feb 23 2003 - 23:45:25 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bernard Peek
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 00:02:27 CET)
Re: primary key - tag numbers
Bernard Peek
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 00:11:36 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 07:40:12 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 07:53:28 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 07:59:15 CET)
Re: Relational/hierarchical data problem
Will
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 09:57:48 CET)
Re: ER-model
Anton Versteeg
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 11:38:26 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 15:42:48 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Steve Kass
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 16:57:10 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 13:44:04 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 14:59:27 CET)
Re: primary key - tag numbers
--CELKO--
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 18:18:42 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 18:25:57 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
--CELKO--
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 18:47:54 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
--CELKO--
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 18:54:47 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 18:59:07 CET)
Re: ER-model
Bob Badour
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 19:03:00 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 20:16:43 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 20:44:55 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 21:01:55 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 22:31:16 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Costin Cozianu
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 04:21:28 CET)
Re: Relational/hierarchical data problem
Neo555
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 22:25:14 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bernard Peek
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 22:40:02 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Steve Kass
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 01:46:14 CET)
Re: Field naming: Same name represents different data
Lee Cichanowicz
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 02:33:07 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 02:40:27 CET)
Re: Field naming: Same name represents different data
Bob Badour
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 08:24:20 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 08:32:36 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 08:43:46 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 11:19:22 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Costin Cozianu
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 15:58:13 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 14:09:12 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 14:11:50 CET)
Re: ER-model
Anton Versteeg
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 14:58:25 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 15:29:05 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 15:32:41 CET)
Re: Relational/hierarchical data problem
Will
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 16:03:05 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 17:26:27 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 18:47:40 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 18:59:00 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 19:26:40 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 19:32:05 CET)
Re: Field naming: Same name represents different data
Bob Badour
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 00:39:40 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 01:08:25 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 10:13:29 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 11:37:27 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 12:17:24 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 13:58:33 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 15:11:22 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 15:14:35 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 16:17:13 CET)
Re: Merging records in a query on the fly -- a problem scenario
stu
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 17:18:58 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 19:09:36 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 19:23:47 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 19:53:12 CET)
Re: Field naming: Same name represents different data
--CELKO--
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 23:42:31 CET)
Re: Field naming: Same name represents different data
- g r e g -
(Thu Feb 27 2003 - 00:18:23 CET)
Re: Relational/hierarchical data problem
Neo555
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 22:40:45 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Thu Feb 27 2003 - 06:36:54 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Thu Feb 27 2003 - 06:46:25 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Thu Feb 27 2003 - 11:45:40 CET)
Re: Relational/hierarchical data problem
Will
(Thu Feb 27 2003 - 12:55:55 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul
(Thu Feb 27 2003 - 14:56:21 CET)
Re: Relational/hierarchical data problem
Neo555
(Thu Feb 27 2003 - 18:55:57 CET)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
Bernard Peek
(Fri Feb 28 2003 - 00:40:20 CET)
Re: Relational/hierarchical data problem
Neo555
(Thu Feb 27 2003 - 22:25:13 CET)
Re: Field naming: Same name represents different data
Lee Cichanowicz
(Fri Feb 28 2003 - 03:54:38 CET)
Re: Hash Join vs. Nested Loops
Scott David Daniels
(Fri Feb 28 2003 - 04:27:55 CET)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
Steve Kass
(Fri Feb 28 2003 - 09:19:06 CET)
Re: Relational/hierarchical data problem
Will
(Fri Feb 28 2003 - 09:41:48 CET)
Re: Looking for a book on databases (in general)
Anith Sen
(Fri Feb 28 2003 - 18:31:34 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul
(Fri Feb 28 2003 - 18:33:48 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Fri Feb 28 2003 - 19:39:44 CET)
Re: Hash Join vs. Nested Loops
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Feb 28 2003 - 20:43:00 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Fri Feb 28 2003 - 20:54:47 CET)
Re: Hash Join vs. Nested Loops
Jan Hidders
(Fri Feb 28 2003 - 21:22:50 CET)
Re: Hash Join vs. Nested Loops
Costin Cozianu
(Fri Feb 28 2003 - 21:42:43 CET)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
--CELKO--
(Fri Feb 28 2003 - 22:14:15 CET)
Re: Looking for a book on databases (in general)
--CELKO--
(Fri Feb 28 2003 - 22:19:04 CET)
Last message date
:
Sat Feb 01 2003 - 01:23:18 CET
Archived on
: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 10:46:23 CEST
3 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
.::
Blogger Home
::
Wiki Home
::
Forum Home
::
Privacy
::
Contact
::.