Re: Relational/hierarchical data problem
From: Will <mrbrown_1998_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 24 Feb 2003 00:57:48 -0800
Message-ID: <8792b468.0302240057.473e3a15_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 24 Feb 2003 00:57:48 -0800
Message-ID: <8792b468.0302240057.473e3a15_at_posting.google.com>
I'd agree with that - what's the alternative method?
Regards
Will
Neo555 <member15981_at_dbforums.com> wrote in message news:<2560794.1045873869_at_dbforums.com>...
> Given:
>
> g10 g12
> g20(10,12) g22(10,12)
> g30(20,22) g32(20,22) g34(20,22)
> g40(30,32) g42(30,32) g44(32,34) g46(32,34)
>
> Would the following be correct?
>
> Consaguinity Report for g40
> Goat1 GoatX CmnAnc Dist
> g40 g10 g10 3
> g40 g12 g12 3
> g40 g20 g20 2
> g40 g22 g22 2
> g40 g30 g30 1
> g40 g32 g32 1
> g40 g34 g20 3
> g40 g42 g30 2
> g40 g44 g32 2
> g40 g46 g32 2
Received on Mon Feb 24 2003 - 09:57:48 CET