Oracle FAQ
Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" SRC="http://www.orafaq.net/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?jscript"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <A HREF="http://www.orafaq.net/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?banner=NonSSI;page=01" TARGET="_blank" onMouseOver="window.status='Click here! Support the Oracle FAQ by supporting our sponsors.';return true" onMouseOut="window.status='';return true"> <IMG SRC="http://www.orafaq.net/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?page=01" HEIGHT=60 WIDTH=468 ALT="Support the Oracle FAQ by supporting our sponsors. Click here!" BORDER=0> </A> </NOSCRIPT>
Home
->
Community
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
32 messages
:
Starting
Mon Feb 24 2003 - 00:40:12 CST,
Ending
Mon Feb 24 2003 - 21:21:28 CST
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Thread view
] [
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 06:44:04 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 14:01:55 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relationalalgebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 07:09:12 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Thu Feb 13 2003 - 07:17:44 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 15:31:16 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Costin Cozianu
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 21:21:28 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 04:19:22 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Costin Cozianu
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 08:58:13 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 11:59:00 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 08:29:05 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 08:42:48 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Steve Kass
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 09:57:10 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 11:25:57 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Steve Kass
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 18:46:14 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bernard Peek
(Sat Feb 22 2003 - 17:54:41 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 00:53:28 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 00:59:15 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
--CELKO--
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 11:47:54 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bernard Peek
(Sun Feb 23 2003 - 17:02:27 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 00:40:12 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
--CELKO--
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 11:54:47 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bernard Peek
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 15:40:02 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational
Bob Badour
(Tue Feb 18 2003 - 21:02:42 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 07:59:27 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 11:59:07 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 13:16:43 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 01:32:36 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 07:11:50 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 18:08:25 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 04:37:27 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 06:58:33 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 08:14:35 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 12:09:36 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 12:53:12 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 23:46:25 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Thu Feb 27 2003 - 04:45:40 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul
(Thu Feb 27 2003 - 07:56:21 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 12:23:47 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul
(Fri Feb 28 2003 - 11:33:48 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Fri Feb 28 2003 - 12:39:44 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Fri Feb 28 2003 - 13:54:47 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jonathan Leffler
(Wed Feb 19 2003 - 00:38:18 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 19:40:27 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 13:44:55 CST)
Re: Relational/hierarchical data problem
Will
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 02:57:48 CST)
Re: Relational/hierarchical data problem
Neo555
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 15:25:14 CST)
Re: primary key - tag numbers
--CELKO--
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 11:18:42 CST)
Re: ER-model
Anton Versteeg
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 04:38:26 CST)
Re: ER-model
Bob Badour
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 12:03:00 CST)
Re: ER-model
Anton Versteeg
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 07:58:25 CST)
New Search engine! Needs your site
support_at_firengine.com
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 09:06:26 CST)
Field naming: Same name represents different data
Lee C.
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 10:53:31 CST)
Re: Field naming: Same name represents different data
- g r e g -
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 11:39:35 CST)
Re: Field naming: Same name represents different data
Bob Badour
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 12:11:16 CST)
Re: Field naming: Same name represents different data
- g r e g -
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 13:12:16 CST)
Re: Field naming: Same name represents different data
Bob Badour
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 01:24:20 CST)
Re: Field naming: Same name represents different data
Paul Vernon
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 16:11:21 CST)
Re: Field naming: Same name represents different data
Bob Badour
(Tue Feb 25 2003 - 17:39:40 CST)
Re: Field naming: Same name represents different data
--CELKO--
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 16:52:42 CST)
Re: Field naming: Same name represents different data
Lee Cichanowicz
(Mon Feb 24 2003 - 19:33:07 CST)
Re: Field naming: Same name represents different data
--CELKO--
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 16:42:31 CST)
Re: Field naming: Same name represents different data
- g r e g -
(Wed Feb 26 2003 - 17:18:23 CST)
Re: Field naming: Same name represents different data
Lee Cichanowicz
(Thu Feb 27 2003 - 20:54:38 CST)
Last message date
:
Mon Feb 24 2003 - 21:21:28 CST
Archived on
: Wed Mar 24 2004 - 10:51:21 CST
32 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Thread view
] [
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
