Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS

From: (wrong string) �phane Desnault <sdesnault_at_noos.fr>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 07:10:31 +0100
Message-ID: <3e4b3796$0$27987$79c14f64_at_nan-newsreader-02.noos.net>

> The original version is better for us SQL people; "Do not multiple
> entities unneccesarily."

Yup... That's what god said to Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden :-). They did not comply, and look what a mess it's been! Received on Thu Feb 13 2003 - 07:10:31 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: montagg: "TUTORIAL OF THEORY DATABASES"
Previous message: Jan Hidders: "Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?"
Maybe in reply to: Kalle: "DB Design Principles for RDBMS"
In reply to --CELKO--: "Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS"
Next in thread: Lauri Pietarinen: "Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message