- student question Joseph Gallegos (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 00:09:34 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Paul (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 03:21:39 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Bob Badour (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 05:50:28 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Alfredo Novoa (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 09:55:36 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Tony (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 11:50:21 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Paul Vernon (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 12:38:20 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Paul Vernon (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 14:35:05 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Niall Litchfield (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 15:20:34 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Troels Arvin (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 16:00:43 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Paul Vernon (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 16:38:07 CEST)
- Re: kdb-tree implementation Qingqing Zhou (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 00:26:14 CEST)
- Re: kdb-tree implementation kieferandreas (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 02:17:22 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Costin Cozianu (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 04:55:02 CEST)
- Re: kdb-tree implementation Qingqing Zhou (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 06:13:25 CEST)
- Re: newton binomial coefficient byrmol (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 07:21:34 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Bob Badour (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 08:33:11 CEST)
- Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra Bob Badour (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 08:50:55 CEST)
- Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra Bob Badour (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 08:56:51 CEST)
- Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra Bob Badour (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 09:06:02 CEST)
- Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra Bob Badour (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 09:24:04 CEST)
- Re: newton binomial coefficient Kamal (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 11:46:01 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type WangKhar (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 11:46:10 CEST)
- Re: newton binomial coefficient programmer (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 12:39:19 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type andrewst (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 12:30:41 CEST)
- Re: newton binomial coefficient andrewst (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 13:35:12 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Paul Vernon (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 16:01:26 CEST)
- Re: newton binomial coefficient Mikito Harakiri (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 19:28:43 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Mikito Harakiri (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 20:02:55 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Bob Badour (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 21:03:52 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type --CELKO-- (Thu Apr 03 2003 - 03:35:41 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type --CELKO-- (Thu Apr 03 2003 - 03:44:36 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type --CELKO-- (Thu Apr 03 2003 - 03:51:38 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type --CELKO-- (Thu Apr 03 2003 - 03:55:27 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Costin Cozianu (Thu Apr 03 2003 - 05:45:09 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Lauri Pietarinen (Thu Apr 03 2003 - 09:44:26 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Alfredo Novoa (Thu Apr 03 2003 - 16:23:53 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type --CELKO-- (Fri Apr 04 2003 - 03:53:10 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Bob Badour (Fri Apr 04 2003 - 04:33:42 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Bob Badour (Fri Apr 04 2003 - 05:18:50 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Alfredo Novoa (Fri Apr 04 2003 - 11:56:47 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Alfredo Novoa (Fri Apr 04 2003 - 12:13:34 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Alfredo Novoa (Fri Apr 04 2003 - 12:19:08 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Lauri Pietarinen (Fri Apr 04 2003 - 16:37:09 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Howard J. Rogers (Fri Apr 04 2003 - 19:33:13 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Paul (Fri Apr 04 2003 - 21:13:56 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Paul (Fri Apr 04 2003 - 21:19:09 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Bob Badour (Sat Apr 05 2003 - 09:02:47 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Bob Badour (Sat Apr 05 2003 - 09:02:47 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Bob Badour (Sat Apr 05 2003 - 09:02:47 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Bob Badour (Sat Apr 05 2003 - 09:37:25 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Bob Badour (Sat Apr 05 2003 - 09:02:47 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Bob Badour (Sat Apr 05 2003 - 09:37:25 CEST)
- Re: Celko: short book on the nested sets model for trees. --CELKO-- (Sat Apr 05 2003 - 20:54:53 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Don Burleson (Sun Apr 06 2003 - 01:43:46 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Howard J. Rogers (Sun Apr 06 2003 - 04:16:57 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Pablo Sanchez (Sun Apr 06 2003 - 05:08:16 CEST)
- Re: Are DOMAINs part of SQL-99 standard? Tibor Karaszi (Sun Apr 06 2003 - 12:54:39 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Niall Litchfield (Sun Apr 06 2003 - 22:15:48 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Jeffrey Hunter (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 01:59:55 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Pablo Sanchez (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 02:53:49 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Bob Badour (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 04:25:37 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Gabriel Gonzalez (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 04:35:56 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Gabriel Gonzalez (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 04:46:08 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Bob Badour (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 07:20:20 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Howard J. Rogers (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 09:04:17 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Howard J. Rogers (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 10:48:22 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Gabriel Gonzalez (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 13:57:29 CEST)
- Re: Celko: short book on the nested sets model for trees. lshepstone (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 13:33:13 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Paul (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 15:32:38 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Bob Badour (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 18:33:28 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Paul (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 19:18:50 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Gabriel Gonzalez (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 19:46:39 CEST)
- Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra Neo (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 21:40:51 CEST)
- Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra Neo (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 22:03:28 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Joel Garry (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 00:07:04 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Jeffrey Hunter (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 00:36:06 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Baseman (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 01:49:14 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Howard J. Rogers (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 03:43:53 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Bob Badour (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 05:28:01 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Bob Badour (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 05:56:10 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Bob Badour (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 05:55:09 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Bob Badour (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 06:32:34 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Bob Badour (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 06:37:19 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Bob Badour (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 06:53:57 CEST)
- Re: Are DOMAINs part of SQL-99 standard? Johann Sander (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 08:47:24 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Howard J. Rogers (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 10:48:29 CEST)
- Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra Eric Junkermann (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 12:51:35 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Howard J. Rogers (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 13:52:54 CEST)
- Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra Neo (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 18:45:30 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Monte Gardner (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 20:48:51 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Alan (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 21:25:11 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Paul Brewer (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 22:52:15 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Bob Badour (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 00:16:41 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Howard J. Rogers (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 00:21:24 CEST)
- Re: Celko: short book on the nested sets model for trees. --CELKO-- (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 01:05:28 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type --CELKO-- (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 01:11:22 CEST)
- Re: PL/SQL Server Pages shay (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 01:27:27 CEST)
- Re: PL/SQL Server Pages Nuno Souto (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 02:43:59 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Lennart Jonsson (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 05:29:13 CEST)
- Re: simple database n_vijay_anand (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 05:32:56 CEST)
- Re: PL/SQL Server Pages John Russell (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 06:33:05 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type GoranG (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 10:56:25 CEST)
- Re: PL/SQL Server Pages Tim X (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 12:19:03 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Alan (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 15:38:48 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? OtisUsenet (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 16:41:08 CEST)
- Re: PL/SQL Server Pages Victor (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 16:51:43 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? --CELKO-- (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 17:55:35 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? andrewst (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 17:44:07 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type --CELKO-- (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 18:29:15 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Bob Badour (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 18:37:55 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Bob Badour (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 18:40:12 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Alan (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 18:57:03 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Bob Badour (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 19:17:25 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? andrewst (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 18:39:21 CEST)
- Re: ORM and FORML Anith Sen (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 20:14:40 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Tom Ivar Helbekkmo (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 20:42:36 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Larry Coon (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 20:43:10 CEST)
- Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra Neo (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 21:35:43 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Bob Badour (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 22:34:19 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Bernard Peek (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 22:46:49 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Paul (Thu Apr 10 2003 - 01:57:43 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Paul (Thu Apr 10 2003 - 04:06:36 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Bob Badour (Thu Apr 10 2003 - 06:00:48 CEST)
- Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra Neo (Thu Apr 10 2003 - 06:13:17 CEST)
- Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra Neo (Thu Apr 10 2003 - 07:11:58 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type GoranG (Thu Apr 10 2003 - 10:22:03 CEST)
- Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra Neo (Thu Apr 10 2003 - 17:35:44 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Anith Sen (Thu Apr 10 2003 - 18:14:35 CEST)
- Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra Joe \ (Thu Apr 10 2003 - 19:23:40 CEST)
- Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal? Mike (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 01:17:12 CEST)
- Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal? Bob Badour (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 03:52:21 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Marshall Spight (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 06:42:04 CEST)
- Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal? Mikito Harakiri (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 08:24:22 CEST)
- Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal? Mike (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 12:28:20 CEST)
- Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal? Mike (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 12:59:36 CEST)
- Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal? Mike (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 14:30:12 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? --CELKO-- (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 16:13:05 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? --CELKO-- (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 16:19:51 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Alfredo Novoa (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 16:34:50 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? andrewst (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 17:58:13 CEST)
- Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal? Mikito Harakiri (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 18:45:44 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Larry Coon (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 18:53:02 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Larry Coon (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 19:04:40 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Mike (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 21:04:35 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Mike (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 21:19:34 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Bob Badour (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 21:46:24 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Bob Badour (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 21:46:24 CEST)
- Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal? Bob Badour (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 22:17:20 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Bob Badour (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 21:46:24 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Bob Badour (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 21:46:24 CEST)
- Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal? Bob Badour (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 22:17:20 CEST)
- Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal? Mikito Harakiri (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 23:06:51 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Bob Badour (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 21:46:24 CEST)
- Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal? Bob Badour (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 22:17:20 CEST)
- Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal? Bob Badour (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 23:07:01 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Bob Badour (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 23:11:16 CEST)
- Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal? Bob Badour (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 23:31:18 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Marshall Spight (Sat Apr 12 2003 - 06:34:31 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Marshall Spight (Sat Apr 12 2003 - 06:39:40 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Mike (Sat Apr 12 2003 - 09:02:43 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Troels Arvin (Sat Apr 12 2003 - 15:54:43 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type --CELKO-- (Sun Apr 13 2003 - 01:33:46 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type --CELKO-- (Sun Apr 13 2003 - 01:40:48 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? --CELKO-- (Sun Apr 13 2003 - 01:55:37 CEST)
- Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal? --CELKO-- (Sun Apr 13 2003 - 02:22:03 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? --CELKO-- (Sun Apr 13 2003 - 02:24:54 CEST)
- Re: Simple ER problem cant figure out how to model Barry (Sun Apr 13 2003 - 10:39:34 CEST)
- Re: Primary Keys and Foreign Keys Bert Blink (Mon Apr 14 2003 - 00:59:28 CEST)
- Re: Primary Keys and Foreign Keys Bert Blink (Mon Apr 14 2003 - 03:20:17 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Marshall Spight (Mon Apr 14 2003 - 08:52:01 CEST)
- Re: Primary Keys and Foreign Keys David (Mon Apr 14 2003 - 10:38:42 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Alfredo Novoa (Mon Apr 14 2003 - 12:01:33 CEST)
- Re: Primary Keys and Foreign Keys Marshall Spight (Mon Apr 14 2003 - 17:18:51 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Bernard Peek (Mon Apr 14 2003 - 17:26:28 CEST)
- Re: Back up options Bernard Peek (Mon Apr 14 2003 - 17:40:20 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Troels Arvin (Mon Apr 14 2003 - 18:18:00 CEST)
- Re: Primary Keys and Foreign Keys --CELKO-- (Mon Apr 14 2003 - 20:43:49 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Peter Gulutzan (Tue Apr 15 2003 - 20:55:32 CEST)
- Re: Table design problem Mike Sherrill (Tue Apr 15 2003 - 23:59:24 CEST)
- Re: Primary Keys and Foreign Keys Mike Sherrill (Tue Apr 15 2003 - 23:59:33 CEST)
- Re: FK -> non PK - bad design? Mike Sherrill (Tue Apr 15 2003 - 23:59:35 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Peter Koch Larsen (Wed Apr 16 2003 - 01:53:35 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site buckwheat (Wed Apr 16 2003 - 03:16:23 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site buckwheat (Wed Apr 16 2003 - 03:18:21 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Howard Rogers (Wed Apr 16 2003 - 03:47:21 CEST)
- Re: Back up options Dps (Thu Apr 17 2003 - 10:30:45 CEST)
- Re: Table design problem Roy Hann (Thu Apr 17 2003 - 12:14:25 CEST)
- Re: EER and ORM data modelling Gianluca Hotz (Thu Apr 17 2003 - 15:15:49 CEST)
- Re: Who invitented the division operator in relational algebra and why? --CELKO-- (Fri Apr 18 2003 - 00:10:08 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type --CELKO-- (Fri Apr 18 2003 - 00:19:00 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type --CELKO-- (Fri Apr 18 2003 - 00:26:02 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type Peter Koch Larsen (Fri Apr 18 2003 - 17:15:26 CEST)
- Re: XML extensions to SQL Richard Wheeldon (Sat Apr 19 2003 - 00:25:15 CEST)
- Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS? Peter Koch Larsen (Sat Apr 19 2003 - 00:45:11 CEST)
- Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS? Anne & Lynn Wheeler (Sat Apr 19 2003 - 18:50:01 CEST)
- Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS? Anne & Lynn Wheeler (Sat Apr 19 2003 - 19:14:47 CEST)
- Re: XML extensions to SQL Paul Vernon (Sun Apr 20 2003 - 00:17:04 CEST)
- Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS? Paul Vernon (Sat Apr 19 2003 - 23:40:33 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type - What is really Boolean and what is not? Bruce Rennie (Mon Apr 21 2003 - 12:30:30 CEST)
- Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS? Peter Koch Larsen (Mon Apr 21 2003 - 17:17:04 CEST)
- Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS? Peter Koch Larsen (Mon Apr 21 2003 - 20:52:46 CEST)
- Re: Table design problem Mike Sherrill (Mon Apr 21 2003 - 21:16:34 CEST)
- Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS? Paul Vernon (Mon Apr 21 2003 - 23:59:23 CEST)
- Re: Table design problem Roy Hann (Tue Apr 22 2003 - 10:53:02 CEST)
- Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS? Peter Koch Larsen (Tue Apr 22 2003 - 18:18:25 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Jeffrey Hunter (Tue Apr 22 2003 - 19:36:29 CEST)
- Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS? Paul Vernon (Tue Apr 22 2003 - 19:27:43 CEST)
- Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS? Peter Koch Larsen (Wed Apr 23 2003 - 00:40:49 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Geomancer (Wed Apr 23 2003 - 01:41:37 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Joel Garry (Wed Apr 23 2003 - 01:47:02 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type - What is really Boolean and what is not? Damjan S. Vujnovic (Tue Apr 22 2003 - 12:22:51 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Paul Drake (Wed Apr 23 2003 - 08:56:50 CEST)
- Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS? Paul Vernon (Wed Apr 23 2003 - 14:41:17 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Alan (Wed Apr 23 2003 - 16:13:42 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Bob Badour (Wed Apr 23 2003 - 19:23:07 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Geomancer (Wed Apr 23 2003 - 23:24:12 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Joel Garry (Thu Apr 24 2003 - 15:43:57 CEST)
- Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS? Peter Koch Larsen (Thu Apr 24 2003 - 18:51:31 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Bob Badour (Thu Apr 24 2003 - 18:48:28 CEST)
- Re: newbie: using id's or total desciption Mirko Koenig (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 00:05:44 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Joel Garry (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 02:39:39 CEST)
- Re: One to One relationships --CELKO-- (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 03:06:56 CEST)
- Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal? --CELKO-- (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 04:08:09 CEST)
- Re: getting the maximum from multiple returns --CELKO-- (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 04:31:22 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 06:49:36 CEST)
- Re: One to One relationships stu (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 10:07:22 CEST)
- Re: newbie: using id's or total desciption stu (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 10:17:41 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Alfredo Novoa (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 11:57:01 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Alfredo Novoa (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 12:02:58 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type - What is really Boolean and what is not? Peter Koch Larsen (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 12:19:12 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Eric Junkermann (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 12:55:14 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Ian (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 12:56:02 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type andrewst (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 14:07:22 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Ian (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 15:06:38 CEST)
- Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS? Paul Vernon (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 11:57:01 CEST)
- Re: newbie: using id's or total desciption Bernard Peek (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 14:58:01 CEST)
- Re: newbie: using id's or total desciption Bernard Peek (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 15:02:29 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Costin Cozianu (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 17:29:59 CEST)
- Re: newbie: using id's or total desciption Mirko Koenig (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 19:01:46 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Bob Badour (Fri Apr 25 2003 - 23:11:29 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type - What is really Boolean and what is not? --CELKO-- (Sat Apr 26 2003 - 01:27:13 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type - What is really Boolean and what is not? Bruce Rennie (Sat Apr 26 2003 - 02:19:21 CEST)
- Re: One to One relationships Marshall Spight (Sat Apr 26 2003 - 03:58:30 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Sat Apr 26 2003 - 04:14:57 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site David Fitzjarrell (Sat Apr 26 2003 - 06:13:24 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Sarah Billings (Sat Apr 26 2003 - 14:30:46 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type - What is really Boolean and what is not? Bruce Rennie (Sat Apr 26 2003 - 16:04:07 CEST)
- Re: The BOOLEAN data type - What is really Boolean and what is not? Bruce Rennie (Sat Apr 26 2003 - 16:09:49 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Paul Vernon (Sat Apr 26 2003 - 19:33:52 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Paul Vernon (Sat Apr 26 2003 - 19:38:14 CEST)
- Re: One to One relationships --CELKO-- (Sat Apr 26 2003 - 21:19:01 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Sat Apr 26 2003 - 21:36:22 CEST)
- Re: One to One relationships Rich Dillon (Sat Apr 26 2003 - 22:52:43 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site Bob Badour (Sun Apr 27 2003 - 03:10:49 CEST)
- Re: Accounting ERD Kenneth Downs (Sun Apr 27 2003 - 18:40:21 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Lauri Pietarinen (Sun Apr 27 2003 - 21:38:11 CEST)
- Re: Accounting ERD andrewst (Sun Apr 27 2003 - 23:32:06 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Paul Vernon (Sun Apr 27 2003 - 23:40:20 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Paul Vernon (Mon Apr 28 2003 - 00:34:13 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Paul Vernon (Mon Apr 28 2003 - 01:02:49 CEST)
- Re: Accounting ERD Kenneth Downs (Mon Apr 28 2003 - 02:53:25 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Mon Apr 28 2003 - 07:58:17 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Mon Apr 28 2003 - 08:31:53 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Lauri Pietarinen (Mon Apr 28 2003 - 09:59:13 CEST)
- Re: newbie: using id's or total desciption Bernard Peek (Mon Apr 28 2003 - 10:32:34 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Paul Vernon (Mon Apr 28 2003 - 15:54:07 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site David Fitzjarrell (Mon Apr 28 2003 - 17:02:49 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Paul Vernon (Mon Apr 28 2003 - 19:45:51 CEST)
- Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site J Alex (Tue Apr 29 2003 - 00:01:07 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Tue Apr 29 2003 - 07:38:56 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Tue Apr 29 2003 - 07:48:27 CEST)
- "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Jonathan Leffler (Tue Apr 29 2003 - 08:06:56 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Paul Vernon (Tue Apr 29 2003 - 12:04:38 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Paul Vernon (Tue Apr 29 2003 - 12:02:46 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Mikito Harakiri (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 00:04:16 CEST)
- Re: One to One relationships John A. Mason (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 01:31:26 CEST)
- Re: Transactions: good or bad? Marshall Spight (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 05:33:37 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 05:35:50 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Peter Koch Larsen (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 10:03:11 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Alfredo Novoa (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 11:56:33 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Alfredo Novoa (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 12:14:16 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Alfredo Novoa (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 12:21:35 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Pablo Sanchez (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 15:49:19 CEST)
- Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Marshall Spight (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 17:47:09 CEST)
- Re: primary ID trick: speed/disk space? John (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 20:05:11 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Mikito Harakiri (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 20:52:08 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 20:17:05 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 20:19:28 CEST)
- Re: primary ID trick: speed/disk space? Bob Badour (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 21:32:48 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Paul Vernon (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 20:39:51 CEST)
- Re: primary ID trick: speed/disk space? Stephen J. Fromm (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 23:53:45 CEST)
- Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss Mikito Harakiri (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 23:59:19 CEST)
- Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra Paul (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 17:04:34 CEST)
- newton binomial coefficient Kamal (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 18:49:03 CEST)
- kdb-tree implementation kieferandreas (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 22:17:05 CEST)
- Expanded Oracle DBA Site Jeffrey Hunter (Thu Apr 03 2003 - 01:49:15 CEST)
- Re: And the correct answer is? Mikito Harakiri (Fri Apr 04 2003 - 01:22:20 CEST)
- Serialization and 2PL Krishna (Fri Apr 04 2003 - 11:08:25 CEST)
- Re: Celko: short book on the nested sets model for trees. macmac38 (Fri Apr 04 2003 - 15:33:53 CEST)
- Are DOMAINs part of SQL-99 standard? Johann Sander (Fri Apr 04 2003 - 17:28:46 CEST)
- Re: student question Barry (Sat Apr 05 2003 - 18:47:53 CEST)
- Database table "triangle"... allowed or not Trooper (Sun Apr 06 2003 - 03:51:04 CEST)
- ORM and FORML Eirik Meland (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 18:01:44 CEST)
- Re: Table design problem Mike Sherrill (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 06:24:38 CEST)
- FK -> non PK - bad design? OtisUsenet (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 06:55:19 CEST)
- simple database n_vijay_anand (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 14:19:06 CEST)
- Undervalued Equity-Rising The Countess (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 18:21:29 CEST)
- Re: PL/SQL Server Pages Glenn Holliday (Tue Apr 08 2003 - 18:30:57 CEST)
- Is multi-type data in one field normal? Mike (Thu Apr 10 2003 - 11:09:10 CEST)
- How to infer causation from correlations cr (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 03:57:22 CEST)
- Creating the right index for multiple keyword searching Bishop (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 12:56:25 CEST)
- Back up options chris (Fri Apr 11 2003 - 12:58:23 CEST)
- Simple ER problem cant figure out how to model chris (Sat Apr 12 2003 - 01:54:44 CEST)
- Which Database Program For Me? MHM49 (Sun Apr 13 2003 - 03:14:16 CEST)
- Primary Keys and Foreign Keys David (Sun Apr 13 2003 - 18:08:23 CEST)
- Putting indices on tables - PK's, FK's and all the rest? Paul Linehan (Mon Apr 14 2003 - 03:47:59 CEST)
- When should stuff be stored in a database? Paul Linehan (Mon Apr 14 2003 - 03:53:52 CEST)
- Who invitented the division operator in relational algebra and why? Amund Trovåg (Tue Apr 15 2003 - 13:07:31 CEST)
- CFP: COOPIS 2003 hakan ferhatosmanoglu (Tue Apr 15 2003 - 19:13:58 CEST)
- CFP: DOA 2003 hakan ferhatosmanoglu (Tue Apr 15 2003 - 19:15:35 CEST)
- CFP: ODBASE 2003 hakan ferhatosmanoglu (Tue Apr 15 2003 - 20:24:17 CEST)
- Local database file Dps (Wed Apr 16 2003 - 17:34:02 CEST)
- Re: EER and ORM data modelling harvey1 (Wed Apr 16 2003 - 21:47:15 CEST)
- XML Database Symposium at VLDB 2003 Undercover Elephant (Thu Apr 17 2003 - 19:49:42 CEST)
- ))) USB Mass Storage Device ((( lorabanks (Fri Apr 18 2003 - 01:36:52 CEST)
- How to cope with missing values - NULLS? Peter Koch Larsen (Fri Apr 18 2003 - 17:17:45 CEST)
- XML extensions to SQL Mikito Harakiri (Fri Apr 18 2003 - 18:56:01 CEST)
- Primary key and requirement Ken (Sun Apr 20 2003 - 02:01:12 CEST)
- Codd's death (x-post from a.f.c) Anne & Lynn Wheeler (Sun Apr 20 2003 - 20:36:57 CEST)
- Gateway To INternet SUccess Jeminem6069 (Mon Apr 21 2003 - 21:17:19 CEST)
- Re: Normalization and Design Question andrewst (Tue Apr 22 2003 - 18:58:48 CEST)
- Help with a query please john (Wed Apr 23 2003 - 00:03:19 CEST)
- General Question about ANSI/X3/SPARC DBMS Architecture Morten Gulbrandsen (Thu Apr 24 2003 - 12:13:51 CEST)
- Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept? Ian (Thu Apr 24 2003 - 15:18:28 CEST)
- Discussion Forum Design stu (Thu Apr 24 2003 - 15:31:53 CEST)
- getting the maximum from multiple returns Michael Sterling (Thu Apr 24 2003 - 15:51:11 CEST)
- One to One relationships stu (Thu Apr 24 2003 - 16:10:50 CEST)
- newbie: using id's or total desciption Mirko Koenig (Thu Apr 24 2003 - 18:10:01 CEST)
- Accounting ERD John Maloney (Sat Apr 26 2003 - 01:01:27 CEST)
- Help: Long for sources of Web Mining ! feelingsometime (Sat Apr 26 2003 - 17:41:53 CEST)
- M:N relationship with canonical pairing Stephen J. Fromm (Mon Apr 28 2003 - 16:23:32 CEST)
- primary ID trick: speed/disk space? Stephen J. Fromm (Mon Apr 28 2003 - 16:32:44 CEST)
- SQL Query Question Doobie Keebler (Mon Apr 28 2003 - 17:46:07 CEST)
- name conflicts in rdbms karl wettin (Tue Apr 29 2003 - 03:20:08 CEST)
- Transactions: good or bad? Marshall Spight (Tue Apr 29 2003 - 08:00:53 CEST)
- Relation model in Access, Need some info.. Mike (Tue Apr 29 2003 - 08:28:57 CEST)
- This is soooo cool Mary Watson (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 03:00:50 CEST)
- Re: Problems with SELECT * PaulGauthier (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 04:02:18 CEST)
- SQL string to INSERT into an associative table? nospam (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 07:52:56 CEST)
- Selectivity GoranG (Wed Apr 30 2003 - 11:24:09 CEST)
- Last message date: Wed Apr 30 2003 - 23:59:19 CEST
- Archived on: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 10:58:40 CEST
|
