Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?

From: --CELKO-- <71062.1056_at_compuserve.com>
Date: 11 Apr 2003 07:19:51 -0700
Message-ID: <c0d87ec0.0304110619.1330e043_at_posting.google.com>


>> It is interesting to note that many natural languages don't have
constructs for singular vs. plural, so in those languages this issue doesn't come up. <<

Written Chinese uses modifiers (counting words) for number and has a wide range of them. You see some of this in English "sheet of paper", " bundle of X", "pair of glasses", etc. Other languages without a plural form use a wide range of collective nouns instead.

>> (There are also some languages with singular, dual, and plural, and
you have to wonder what they would do. But I think they are all dead languages, so the issue is moot.) <<

Arabic isn't dead yet! Hungarian also has some duals in it. And my Arab students used the plurals. Received on Fri Apr 11 2003 - 16:19:51 CEST

Original text of this message