Home
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
416 messages
:
Starting
Sat Mar 01 2003 - 08:38:47 CET,
Ending
Mon Mar 31 2003 - 20:11:15 CEST
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Re: Hash Join vs. Nested Loops
Scott David Daniels
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 08:38:47 CET)
Re: Erm Modelling
Ian
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 02:13:10 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 08:08:56 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 14:58:04 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 19:45:54 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 02:56:29 CET)
Re: How to store temporal info?
Alan Gutierrez
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 05:47:04 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 08:36:05 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 09:32:49 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:25:45 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 19:18:28 CET)
Re: How to store temporal info?
Lennart Jonsson
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:33:21 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:00:02 CET)
Re: How to store temporal info?
John Gilson
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 15:18:49 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 17:14:28 CET)
Re: How to store temporal info?
Lennart Jonsson
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 19:38:05 CET)
Re: How to store temporal info?
John Gilson
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 20:43:53 CET)
Re: How to store temporal info?
Lennart Jonsson
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 21:36:40 CET)
Re: How to store temporal info?
Alan Gutierrez
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 23:03:05 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 23:10:12 CET)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
hs
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 23:54:38 CET)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
--CELKO--
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 01:55:54 CET)
Re: One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution
--CELKO--
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 02:18:51 CET)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
karl wettin
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 02:24:23 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 07:32:03 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 09:57:45 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 13:22:01 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 13:31:19 CET)
Re: One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution
nippur
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:29:15 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:17:13 CET)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
hs
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:49:52 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:55:25 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 15:06:21 CET)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
Lennart Jonsson
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 21:21:24 CET)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
--CELKO--
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 00:37:05 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
john
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 00:15:25 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
Larry Coon
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 00:49:30 CET)
Re: Please help me with Relational Database design
_at_s
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 09:40:36 CET)
Re: Please help me with Relational Database design
Jan Hidders
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 10:43:21 CET)
Re: finding a thesis topic
Paul Vernon
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 11:12:54 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
Paul Vernon
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 11:43:40 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
Bernard Peek
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 11:49:30 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
Pablo Sanchez
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 14:32:48 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
john
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 14:47:38 CET)
Re: sample datasets
max101000010.01000101
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 15:49:17 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
Pablo Sanchez
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 17:36:22 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 19:14:31 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 19:14:40 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 22:25:26 CET)
Re: finding a thesis topic
D Guntermann
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 01:01:52 CET)
Re: finding a thesis topic
karl wettin
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 03:01:21 CET)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
stu
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 09:48:56 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 11:01:14 CET)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
Jan Hidders
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 11:16:31 CET)
Re: Logically model never possible real world or my forever imperfect business?
Alan
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:12:46 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
Alan
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:19:20 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
Paul Vernon
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:20:34 CET)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
Jon Maz
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:52:34 CET)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
Jon Maz
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:55:52 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
Alan
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 22:30:40 CET)
Re: Include history in logical model or physical design
Jason W. Paul
(Sat Mar 08 2003 - 00:35:21 CET)
Re: Include history in logical model or physical design
Henry Craven
(Sat Mar 08 2003 - 22:13:22 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 22:48:16 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 22:53:14 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 23:03:42 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 23:28:13 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 23:41:21 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 00:23:29 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 00:42:59 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 00:52:40 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 00:55:32 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 01:29:59 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 01:52:21 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 09:05:13 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 11:23:39 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:35:42 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:38:22 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:44:22 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:38:34 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:40:45 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:11:53 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:54:12 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:43:02 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:28:08 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 19:54:58 CET)
Re: How to store temporal info?
OlegJay
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 21:47:04 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
Dr DOOM
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 01:12:16 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:56:41 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 04:01:47 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:03:39 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:14:55 CET)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
Anthony Youngman
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:16:04 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:28:03 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Damjan S. Vujnovic
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:05:44 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:03:15 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 11:27:37 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:40:47 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
Bernard Peek
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:35:01 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Bernard Peek
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:44:33 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:55:12 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:56:40 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:24:48 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 18:54:30 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:45:03 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Lennart Jonsson
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:57:12 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:21:27 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:32:54 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:35:45 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:45:47 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:53:08 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:59:47 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 22:16:42 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 22:21:28 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 22:23:11 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 22:40:51 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:15:12 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:27:46 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 00:04:53 CET)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
karl wettin
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 11:51:20 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
karl wettin
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 11:53:03 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 06:39:17 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 06:44:17 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 06:51:57 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 08:31:17 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 08:35:08 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:06:06 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:37:08 CET)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
Anthony Youngman
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:16:18 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
Alan
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 15:42:57 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 16:45:05 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:20:46 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:31:03 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:33:26 CET)
Re: SQL string matching
Richard Wheeldon
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 01:31:26 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 06:45:06 CET)
Re: Database design
proxy.mzh.de
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 22:05:32 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 07:20:34 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 07:34:51 CET)
Re: Help!
Theo Peterbroers
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 10:38:05 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:36:52 CET)
Re: Logically model never possible real world or my forever imperfect business?
Mike Sherrill
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 19:03:37 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Cimarron Taylor
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 19:09:37 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 20:24:36 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:42:55 CET)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
RayD
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 22:48:46 CET)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
Richard Wheeldon
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 01:22:01 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 03:52:57 CET)
Data management principles (formerly Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 04:27:20 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 04:55:06 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Gianluca Hotz
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 14:12:51 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Pablo Sanchez
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 18:03:37 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Pablo Sanchez
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 18:04:57 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Tibor Karaszi
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 18:53:00 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:21:16 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:25:08 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:33:34 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Pablo Sanchez
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:40:06 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Peter Koch Larsen
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:51:59 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:48:09 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:55:57 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 20:01:55 CET)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
Larry Coon
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:59:31 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 20:16:02 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Pablo Sanchez
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 20:24:56 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Pablo Sanchez
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 20:38:04 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Pablo Sanchez
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 20:40:12 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 21:42:47 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
--CELKO--
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 01:35:10 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
--CELKO--
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 01:46:09 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
--CELKO--
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 02:05:24 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 02:18:09 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 05:41:33 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 06:22:03 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 06:24:30 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 06:41:48 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 06:59:31 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 08:06:07 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 08:41:11 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 08:50:52 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Peter Koch Larsen
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 13:44:19 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 16:52:44 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 16:54:49 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Pablo Sanchez
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 23:40:55 CET)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
Neo
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 05:23:05 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Bob Badour
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 05:52:38 CET)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
Bob Badour
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 05:57:37 CET)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
Steve Kass
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 07:39:10 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Peter Koch Larsen
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 12:39:56 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 17:55:10 CET)
Re: db design question
Peter Johal
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 22:56:02 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 00:26:33 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 06:07:46 CET)
Re: Database design
Woody
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 09:36:18 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
oferbu
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 07:32:22 CET)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
programmer
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 11:51:05 CET)
Re: what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel';
N. Shamsundar
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 16:21:21 CET)
Re: db design question
t
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 18:06:08 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 18:10:05 CET)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
Bob Badour
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 18:19:41 CET)
Re: what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel';
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 18:28:23 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
--CELKO--
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 00:54:33 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
--CELKO--
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 01:28:55 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 02:40:38 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Jonathan Leffler
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 06:16:38 CET)
Re: what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel';
Klinton Lee
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 08:25:39 CET)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
Neo
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 19:14:47 CET)
Re: File System Data Model
Baseman
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 02:35:22 CET)
Re: File System Data Model
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 03:15:33 CET)
Re: Simple db table design question
Jon Maz
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 11:03:42 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Peter Koch Larsen
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 11:24:01 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
GoranG
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 12:14:43 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Tony
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 15:43:50 CET)
Re: Recursive Query
Ray
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 18:58:26 CET)
Re: Simple db table design question
--CELKO--
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 20:25:19 CET)
Re: Recursive Query
Lennart Jonsson
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 23:28:25 CET)
Re: Recursive Query
--CELKO--
(Thu Mar 20 2003 - 02:31:42 CET)
Re: Database Career
Barry
(Thu Mar 20 2003 - 18:47:07 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
Tony
(Thu Mar 20 2003 - 21:40:00 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
--CELKO--
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 00:09:31 CET)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
--CELKO--
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 00:22:57 CET)
Re: Hash Join vs. Nested Loops
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 01:38:57 CET)
recursive index
GoranG
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 10:38:48 CET)
Re: recursive index
--CELKO--
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 20:05:41 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 11:52:24 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
Jon Maz
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 12:35:48 CET)
Re: Simple db table design question
Jon Maz
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 12:46:33 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
--CELKO--
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:59:01 CET)
Re: Help with a query
John Gilson
(Sat Mar 22 2003 - 00:21:30 CET)
Re: Help with a query
john
(Sat Mar 22 2003 - 00:32:44 CET)
Re: Help with a query
John Gilson
(Sat Mar 22 2003 - 00:40:55 CET)
Re: recursive index
GoranG
(Sat Mar 22 2003 - 02:46:40 CET)
Re: Large files in a database
Hans Forbrich
(Sat Mar 22 2003 - 03:35:28 CET)
Re: Large files in a database
Steve Kass
(Sat Mar 22 2003 - 18:55:03 CET)
Re: Large files in a database
Pablo Sanchez
(Sun Mar 23 2003 - 01:49:13 CET)
Re: recursive index
--CELKO--
(Sun Mar 23 2003 - 03:01:10 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
Jon Maz
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 10:26:35 CET)
Re: Protest against the war on Iraq
WangKhar
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 12:21:08 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
--CELKO--
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 20:08:31 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
Jon Maz
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 21:08:10 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
Stephen
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 06:06:37 CET)
Re: Simple db table design question
Tim X
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 08:41:44 CET)
Re: File System Data Model
Tim X
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 08:45:55 CET)
Re: Help with another query!
Heinz Huber
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 08:58:14 CET)
Re: Simple db table design question
Heinz Huber
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 09:06:02 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
Nis Jorgensen
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 14:01:46 CET)
Re: Help with another query!
john
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 16:08:15 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
Lennart Jonsson
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 21:44:48 CET)
Re: sql question - hierarchy
LokalST
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:05:54 CET)
Re: sql question - hierarchy
Lennart Jonsson
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 18:48:22 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
--CELKO--
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 20:58:57 CET)
Re: sql question - hierarchy
--CELKO--
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 21:01:15 CET)
Re: sql question - hierarchy
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 21:36:28 CET)
Re: Help with another query!
Heinz Huber
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 07:54:39 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 09:07:56 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
Paul Vernon
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 18:57:35 CET)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
Neo
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 16:39:02 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
Tibor Karaszi
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 18:50:55 CET)
Re: Materialised Path Heirarchy
--CELKO--
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 19:53:04 CET)
Re: PL/SQL Server Pages
Finn Ellebaek Nielsen
(Sat Mar 29 2003 - 10:21:01 CET)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
byrmol
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 05:45:07 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 07:26:47 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
--CELKO--
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 20:11:15 CEST)
Re: A DBMS implementation Question
Dieter Nöth
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 09:11:08 CET)
Re: A DBMS implementation Question
owen
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 15:23:57 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:50:49 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 13:38:38 CET)
Erm Modelling
Ian
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 14:55:56 CET)
Re: Erm Modelling
karl wettin
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 19:30:32 CET)
finding a thesis topic
Amal
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 00:21:55 CET)
Re: finding a thesis topic
Undercover Elephant
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 01:04:03 CET)
Problem of RDBMS's implementation
owen
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 13:01:07 CET)
How to store temporal info?
Lennart Jonsson
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 19:34:18 CET)
Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
hs
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 19:46:51 CET)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
karl wettin
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 23:35:08 CET)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
Jesse
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 00:34:48 CET)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
Steve Kass
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 03:15:41 CET)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
Jesse
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 04:39:42 CET)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
Steve Kass
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 08:31:41 CET)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
Jesse
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:15:27 CET)
Need help/advice for database structure
Oodie
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 07:02:46 CET)
Re: Need help/advice for database structure
Steve Kass
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 08:41:43 CET)
Re: Need help/advice for database structure
JL
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 14:29:56 CET)
Re: Need help/advice for database structure
Paul Vernon
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 19:51:24 CET)
Re: Hierarchical data
Christian Wagner
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 09:21:04 CET)
Re: primary key - tag numbers
tretasdehr
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:13:23 CET)
One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution
nippur
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 19:09:30 CET)
Re: One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution
John Gilson
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 21:12:04 CET)
Re: Relational/hierarchical data problem
Neo
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 23:23:09 CET)
Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
Jon Maz
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 15:28:26 CET)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
Damjan S. Vujnovic
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:30:35 CET)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
karl wettin
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:03:56 CET)
sample datasets
max101000010.01000101
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:57:49 CET)
Re: sample datasets
N. Shamsundar
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 21:11:25 CET)
many to many relationship
john
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 22:23:22 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
Pablo Sanchez
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 22:40:51 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
Larry Coon
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 23:53:38 CET)
Please help me with Relational Database design
_at_s
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 22:52:18 CET)
Re: Please help me with Relational Database design
_at_s
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 22:55:44 CET)
Re: Please help me with Relational Database design
Jan Hidders
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 23:26:14 CET)
Free Support, All OSes, All Applications
ProNetworkPC
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 14:33:36 CET)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
Tony
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 18:54:58 CET)
Logically model never possible real world or my forever imperfect business?
OlegJay
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 18:58:58 CET)
Call for papers: ODBASE
hakan ferhatosmanoglu
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 19:24:48 CET)
Call for Papers: CoopIS
hakan ferhatosmanoglu
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 19:26:09 CET)
Include history in logical model or physical design
OlegJay
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 17:04:39 CET)
SQL string matching
abracad
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 01:03:41 CET)
Re: SQL string matching
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 08:02:34 CET)
Re: SQL string matching
Lennart Jonsson
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 11:55:18 CET)
Tabe Relationship
john
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:29:48 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Jason W. Paul
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:49:52 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Lennart Jonsson
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:56:50 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Damjan S. Vujnovic
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 11:47:56 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
cose
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 22:30:10 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:00:49 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Lennart Jonsson
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 23:41:08 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Damjan S. Vujnovic
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:59:40 CET)
Database design
john
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:51:21 CET)
Re: Database design
Undercover Elephant
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:59:58 CET)
Database design
john
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:55:41 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 20:24:40 CET)
[ANN] New Book on XML Data Management
Undercover Elephant
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 00:40:57 CET)
Re: user defined column functions?
dlperdue
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:20:17 CET)
Database History
lieut_data
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 01:12:56 CET)
Re: Database History
Jerry Gitomer
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 05:51:38 CET)
Re: Database History
Pablo Sanchez
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 06:16:52 CET)
Re: Database History
Lieut_Data
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:12:00 CET)
Re: Database History
Lieut_Data
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:19:10 CET)
Re: Database History
Pablo Sanchez
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:40:45 CET)
Problems with SELECT *
Curtis \
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:40:53 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Pablo Sanchez
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:58:24 CET)
Help!
laura
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 22:48:39 CET)
Why using "Group By"
oferbu
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 11:07:14 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:58:41 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 19:31:25 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 20:57:29 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 22:18:53 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
stu
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:03:37 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 18:05:00 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Tony
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 18:20:55 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 18:32:14 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 19:36:04 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 19:43:50 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 19:57:46 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 20:37:50 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 20:40:19 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 20:43:04 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 20:23:32 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 21:02:15 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 21:18:14 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 21:42:34 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 21:48:58 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 22:02:59 CET)
SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:07:52 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:20:46 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:56:13 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 22:13:06 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 22:15:10 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 22:36:07 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Larry Coon
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 22:43:23 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 22:49:54 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:03:04 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:05:42 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:32:57 CET)
unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
ben
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 06:31:16 CET)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
programmer
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 11:49:37 CET)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 11:12:31 CET)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 11:19:45 CET)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:37:57 CET)
db design question
t
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 20:42:16 CET)
CFP: XML Database Symposium at VLDB 2003
Undercover Elephant
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 01:19:57 CET)
Expressing SQL in relational algebra
Neo
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 03:50:42 CET)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 07:20:27 CET)
Like to Discuss Weather?-Come Join! Heres our Newsletter for Sunday!
WeatherForums
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 08:42:55 CET)
what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel';
hayseed
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 14:33:31 CET)
Simple db table design question
Jon Maz
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 16:17:43 CET)
Re: Simple db table design question
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 17:48:19 CET)
Re: Simple db table design question
--CELKO--
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 21:32:31 CET)
Re: Simple db table design question
Jon Maz
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 18:11:23 CET)
File System Data Model
Peter
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 16:19:25 CET)
Re: File System Data Model
Information
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 18:48:36 CET)
Re: File System Data Model
--CELKO--
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 21:34:04 CET)
Cfp: Cikm 03
Padmini Sriniva
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 20:06:01 CET)
Recursive Query
Ray
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 21:16:27 CET)
Re: Recursive Query
Alan
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 21:26:39 CET)
Re: Recursive Query
Lennart Jonsson
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 23:35:44 CET)
Large files in a database
BassGEN
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 00:14:01 CET)
Re: Large files in a database
Pablo Sanchez
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 08:18:54 CET)
Database Career
Bob Shea
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 04:43:03 CET)
Re: Database Career
- g r e g -
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 18:27:50 CET)
Simple linking table question
Jon Maz
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 19:53:00 CET)
Protest against the war on Iraq
Karel Miklav
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 10:39:54 CET)
Re: Protest against the war on Iraq
stu
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 11:25:24 CET)
Help with a query
john
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 23:03:30 CET)
Re: Help with a query
John Gilson
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 23:08:14 CET)
Re: Help with a query
john
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 23:46:22 CET)
Wanted Colorado "Unwanted computers & parts "
Joseph
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 01:55:13 CET)
Help with another query!
john
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 14:23:14 CET)
Re: Help with another query!
André Næss
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 16:06:54 CET)
How to verify that a connection to the Database has been closed?
Amardeep Verma
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 08:22:46 CET)
sql question - hierarchy
LokalST
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 15:50:36 CET)
Re: sql question - hierarchy
Lennart Jonsson
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 21:05:48 CET)
Table Structure
john
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 16:14:17 CET)
Materialised Path Heirarchy
stu
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 12:11:00 CET)
Re: Materialised Path Heirarchy
David Portas
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 12:58:12 CET)
Re: Materialised Path Heirarchy
stu
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 12:32:41 CET)
Re: Materialised Path Heirarchy
David Portas
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 13:15:04 CET)
CFP: Quality of Conceptual Models
Geert Poels
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:18:11 CET)
PL/SQL Server Pages
dany
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 20:10:18 CET)
Re: PL/SQL Server Pages
shay
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 23:23:10 CET)
Database design
Manik Chandra Roy
(Sat Mar 29 2003 - 14:12:56 CET)
The BOOLEAN data type
Troels Arvin
(Sun Mar 30 2003 - 05:23:10 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
Tony
(Sun Mar 30 2003 - 18:57:35 CEST)
DB design dilemma??
Manik Chandra Roy
(Sun Mar 30 2003 - 06:21:31 CEST)
Table design problem
Roy Hann
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 12:42:39 CEST)
Re: Table design problem
Lennart Jonsson
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 17:07:01 CEST)
Re: Table design problem
Tony
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 17:07:59 CEST)
Last message date
:
Mon Mar 31 2003 - 20:11:15 CEST
Archived on
: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 10:52:33 CEST
416 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
.::
Blogger Home
::
Wiki Home
::
Forum Home
::
Privacy
::
Contact
::.