Oracle FAQ
Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" SRC="http://www.orafaq.net/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?jscript"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <A HREF="http://www.orafaq.net/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?banner=NonSSI;page=01" TARGET="_blank" onMouseOver="window.status='Click here! Support the Oracle FAQ by supporting our sponsors.';return true" onMouseOut="window.status='';return true"> <IMG SRC="http://www.orafaq.net/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?page=01" HEIGHT=60 WIDTH=468 ALT="Support the Oracle FAQ by supporting our sponsors. Click here!" BORDER=0> </A> </NOSCRIPT>
Home
->
Community
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
420 messages
:
Starting
Sat Mar 01 2003 - 01:38:47 CST,
Ending
Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:53:49 CST
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Re: Hash Join vs. Nested Loops
Scott David Daniels
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 01:38:47 CST)
Re: Hash Join vs. Nested Loops
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 20 2003 - 18:38:57 CST)
Re: A DBMS implementation Question
Dieter Nöth
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 02:11:08 CST)
Re: A DBMS implementation Question
owen
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 08:23:57 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 04:50:49 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 06:38:38 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 01:08:56 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 07:58:04 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 12:45:54 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 19:56:29 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 01:36:05 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Steve Kass
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 02:32:49 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 03:25:45 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:18:28 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 06:31:19 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Paul Vernon
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 07:17:13 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 07:55:25 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 05:00:02 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:14:28 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 16:10:12 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 00:32:03 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 02:57:45 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 06:22:01 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 08:06:21 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 12:14:31 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 12:14:40 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 15:25:26 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 04:01:14 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:03:42 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:23:29 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:52:21 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 02:05:13 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 06:44:22 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 09:40:45 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:11:53 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:54:58 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:03:39 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:56:40 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:21:27 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:45:47 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:23:11 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:44:17 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 01:31:17 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:16:42 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:40:51 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:27:46 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 17:04:53 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:51:57 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 01:35:08 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:45:06 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:41:21 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:55:32 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:24:40 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:14:55 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:28:13 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:42:59 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:29:59 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 06:35:42 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 09:38:34 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:43:02 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 20:56:41 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:28:03 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:40:47 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:32:54 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:53:08 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:45:03 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:59:47 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:39:17 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 02:06:06 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:20:46 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 04:23:39 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 06:38:22 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 09:54:12 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 11:28:08 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 21:01:47 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 04:27:37 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:55:12 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:24:48 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:35:45 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 02:37:08 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:45:05 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:33:26 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 00:34:51 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:31:03 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 00:20:34 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 08:36:52 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:24:36 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:42:55 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 21:55:06 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
--CELKO--
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 18:46:09 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 17:26:33 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 23:07:46 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
--CELKO--
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 17:54:33 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:21:28 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:15:12 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:48:16 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Bob Badour
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:53:14 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
Jan Hidders
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:52:40 CST)
Erm Modelling
Ian
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 07:55:56 CST)
Re: Erm Modelling
karl wettin
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 12:30:32 CST)
Re: Erm Modelling
Ian
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 19:13:10 CST)
finding a thesis topic
Amal
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 17:21:55 CST)
Re: finding a thesis topic
Undercover Elephant
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 18:04:03 CST)
Re: finding a thesis topic
Paul Vernon
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 04:12:54 CST)
Re: finding a thesis topic
karl wettin
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 20:01:21 CST)
Re: finding a thesis topic
D Guntermann
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 18:01:52 CST)
Problem of RDBMS's implementation
owen
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 06:01:07 CST)
How to store temporal info?
Lennart Jonsson
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 12:34:18 CST)
Re: How to store temporal info?
Alan Gutierrez
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 22:47:04 CST)
Re: How to store temporal info?
Lennart Jonsson
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 03:33:21 CST)
Re: How to store temporal info?
John Gilson
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 08:18:49 CST)
Re: How to store temporal info?
Lennart Jonsson
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:38:05 CST)
Re: How to store temporal info?
John Gilson
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 13:43:53 CST)
Re: How to store temporal info?
Lennart Jonsson
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 14:36:40 CST)
Re: How to store temporal info?
Alan Gutierrez
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 16:03:05 CST)
Re: How to store temporal info?
OlegJay
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:47:04 CST)
Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
hs
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 12:46:51 CST)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
karl wettin
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 16:35:08 CST)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
hs
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 16:54:38 CST)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
karl wettin
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 19:24:23 CST)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
--CELKO--
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 18:55:54 CST)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
hs
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 07:49:52 CST)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
--CELKO--
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 17:37:05 CST)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
Lennart Jonsson
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:21:24 CST)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
Jesse
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 17:34:48 CST)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
Steve Kass
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 20:15:41 CST)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
Jesse
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 21:39:42 CST)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
Steve Kass
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 01:31:41 CST)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
Jesse
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 03:15:27 CST)
Need help/advice for database structure
Oodie
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 00:02:46 CST)
Re: Need help/advice for database structure
Steve Kass
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 01:41:43 CST)
Re: Need help/advice for database structure
JL
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 07:29:56 CST)
Re: Need help/advice for database structure
Paul Vernon
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:51:24 CST)
Re: Hierarchical data
Christian Wagner
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 02:21:04 CST)
Re: primary key - tag numbers
tretasdehr
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 05:13:23 CST)
One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution
nippur
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:09:30 CST)
Re: One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution
John Gilson
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 14:12:04 CST)
Re: One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution
--CELKO--
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 19:18:51 CST)
Re: One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution
nippur
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 07:29:15 CST)
Re: Relational/hierarchical data problem
Neo
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 16:23:09 CST)
Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
Jon Maz
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 08:28:26 CST)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
Damjan S. Vujnovic
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 10:30:35 CST)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
Jon Maz
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 09:52:34 CST)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
karl wettin
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 10:03:56 CST)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
Jon Maz
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 09:55:52 CST)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
Anthony Youngman
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:16:04 CST)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
karl wettin
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 04:51:20 CST)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
Anthony Youngman
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 05:16:18 CST)
sample datasets
max101000010.01000101
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 10:57:49 CST)
Re: sample datasets
N. Shamsundar
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 14:11:25 CST)
Re: sample datasets
max101000010.01000101
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 08:49:17 CST)
many to many relationship
john
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 15:23:22 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
Pablo Sanchez
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 15:40:51 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
Larry Coon
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 16:53:38 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
john
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:15:25 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
Larry Coon
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:49:30 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
Paul Vernon
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 04:43:40 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
Pablo Sanchez
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 07:32:48 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
john
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 07:47:38 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
Pablo Sanchez
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 10:36:22 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
Alan
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 08:19:20 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
Paul Vernon
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 09:20:34 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
Alan
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:30:40 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
Bernard Peek
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:35:01 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
Alan
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 08:42:57 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
Dr DOOM
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:12:16 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
Paul Vernon
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 11:57:35 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
Bernard Peek
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 04:49:30 CST)
Please help me with Relational Database design
_at_s
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 15:52:18 CST)
Re: Please help me with Relational Database design
_at_s
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 15:55:44 CST)
Re: Please help me with Relational Database design
Jan Hidders
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 16:26:14 CST)
Re: Please help me with Relational Database design
_at_s
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 02:40:36 CST)
Re: Please help me with Relational Database design
Jan Hidders
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 03:43:21 CST)
Free Support, All OSes, All Applications
ProNetworkPC
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 07:33:36 CST)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
Tony
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 11:54:58 CST)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
stu
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 02:48:56 CST)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
Jan Hidders
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 04:16:31 CST)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
RayD
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:48:46 CST)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
Richard Wheeldon
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 18:22:01 CST)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
Larry Coon
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:59:31 CST)
Logically model never possible real world or my forever imperfect business?
OlegJay
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 11:58:58 CST)
Re: Logically model never possible real world or my forever imperfect business?
Alan
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 08:12:46 CST)
Re: Logically model never possible real world or my forever imperfect business?
Mike Sherrill
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:03:37 CST)
Call for papers: ODBASE
hakan ferhatosmanoglu
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 12:24:48 CST)
Call for Papers: CoopIS
hakan ferhatosmanoglu
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 12:26:09 CST)
Include history in logical model or physical design
OlegJay
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 10:04:39 CST)
Re: Include history in logical model or physical design
Jason W. Paul
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 17:35:21 CST)
Re: Include history in logical model or physical design
Henry Craven
(Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:13:22 CST)
SQL string matching
abracad
(Sat Mar 08 2003 - 18:03:41 CST)
Re: SQL string matching
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 01:02:34 CST)
Re: SQL string matching
Lennart Jonsson
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 04:55:18 CST)
Re: SQL string matching
Richard Wheeldon
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 18:31:26 CST)
Tabe Relationship
john
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 03:29:48 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Jason W. Paul
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:49:52 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 11:00:49 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Lennart Jonsson
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:41:08 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Damjan S. Vujnovic
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:05:44 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:03:15 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Lennart Jonsson
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:57:12 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Bernard Peek
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:44:33 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 11:54:30 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
karl wettin
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 04:53:03 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Damjan S. Vujnovic
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 07:59:40 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Lennart Jonsson
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 06:56:50 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
Damjan S. Vujnovic
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 04:47:56 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
cose
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:30:10 CST)
Database design
john
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 07:51:21 CST)
Re: Database design
Undercover Elephant
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 07:59:58 CST)
Database design
john
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 07:55:41 CST)
Re: Database design
proxy.mzh.de
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 15:05:32 CST)
Re: Database design
Woody
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 02:36:18 CST)
[ANN] New Book on XML Data Management
Undercover Elephant
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:40:57 CST)
Re: user defined column functions?
dlperdue
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:20:17 CST)
Database History
lieut_data
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 18:12:56 CST)
Re: Database History
Jerry Gitomer
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 22:51:38 CST)
Re: Database History
Lieut_Data
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:19:10 CST)
Re: Database History
Pablo Sanchez
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:40:45 CST)
Re: Database History
Pablo Sanchez
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:16:52 CST)
Re: Database History
Lieut_Data
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:12:00 CST)
Problems with SELECT *
Curtis \
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:40:53 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Pablo Sanchez
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:58:24 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Cimarron Taylor
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:09:37 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Gianluca Hotz
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 07:12:51 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Pablo Sanchez
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 11:04:57 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:25:08 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Pablo Sanchez
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:40:06 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:48:09 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Pablo Sanchez
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:38:04 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Pablo Sanchez
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:40:12 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:22:03 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Pablo Sanchez
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 11:03:37 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:33:34 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Pablo Sanchez
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:24:56 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:24:30 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Pablo Sanchez
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 16:40:55 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:52:38 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
--CELKO--
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:05:24 CST)
Help!
laura
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 15:48:39 CST)
Re: Help!
Theo Peterbroers
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 03:38:05 CST)
Why using "Group By"
oferbu
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 04:07:14 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 05:58:41 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 11:05:00 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Tony
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 11:20:55 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:57:46 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:43:04 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 11:32:14 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:23:32 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 14:02:15 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:31:25 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:36:04 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:43:50 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:40:19 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 14:18:14 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:02:59 CST)
SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:07:52 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:20:46 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:56:13 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 20:52:57 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Tibor Karaszi
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 11:53:00 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:21:16 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Peter Koch Larsen
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:51:59 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:01:55 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Peter Koch Larsen
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 06:44:19 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 09:52:44 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Peter Koch Larsen
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 05:39:56 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 10:55:10 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:55:57 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:16:02 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 14:42:47 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 22:41:33 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:41:48 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 01:06:07 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
--CELKO--
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 18:35:10 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:18:09 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:59:31 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Mikito Harakiri
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 01:41:11 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 01:50:52 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:37:50 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:57:29 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 14:42:34 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 14:48:58 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:15:10 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:13:06 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:36:07 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:03:04 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:32:57 CST)
Data management principles (formerly Why using "Group By")
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 21:27:20 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Larry Coon
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:43:23 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:05:42 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:18:53 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:49:54 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
stu
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 05:03:37 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 09:54:49 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
oferbu
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 00:32:22 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Bob Badour
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 11:10:05 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 19:40:38 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Jonathan Leffler
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 23:16:38 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
--CELKO--
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 18:28:55 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Peter Koch Larsen
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 04:24:01 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
GoranG
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 05:14:43 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
Tony
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 08:43:50 CST)
unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
ben
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:31:16 CST)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
programmer
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 04:49:37 CST)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:37:57 CST)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
programmer
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 04:51:05 CST)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
Bob Badour
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 11:19:41 CST)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 04:12:31 CST)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 04:19:45 CST)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
--CELKO--
(Thu Mar 20 2003 - 17:22:57 CST)
db design question
t
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:42:16 CST)
Re: db design question
Peter Johal
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 15:56:02 CST)
Re: db design question
t
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 11:06:08 CST)
CFP: XML Database Symposium at VLDB 2003
Undercover Elephant
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 18:19:57 CST)
Expressing SQL in relational algebra
Neo
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 20:50:42 CST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 00:20:27 CST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
Neo
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:23:05 CST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
Bob Badour
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:57:37 CST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
Steve Kass
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 00:39:10 CST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
Neo
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 12:14:47 CST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
Neo
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:39:02 CST)
Like to Discuss Weather?-Come Join! Heres our Newsletter for Sunday!
WeatherForums
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 01:42:55 CST)
what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel';
hayseed
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 07:33:31 CST)
Re: what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel';
N. Shamsundar
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 09:21:21 CST)
Re: what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel';
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 11:28:23 CST)
Re: what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel';
Klinton Lee
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 01:25:39 CST)
Simple db table design question
Jon Maz
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 09:17:43 CST)
Re: Simple db table design question
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 10:48:19 CST)
Re: Simple db table design question
Jon Maz
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 11:11:23 CST)
Re: Simple db table design question
Heinz Huber
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 02:06:02 CST)
Re: Simple db table design question
--CELKO--
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 14:32:31 CST)
Re: Simple db table design question
Jon Maz
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 04:03:42 CST)
Re: Simple db table design question
--CELKO--
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 13:25:19 CST)
Re: Simple db table design question
Jon Maz
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 05:46:33 CST)
Re: Simple db table design question
Tim X
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 01:41:44 CST)
File System Data Model
Peter
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 09:19:25 CST)
Re: File System Data Model
Information
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 11:48:36 CST)
Re: File System Data Model
--CELKO--
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 14:34:04 CST)
Re: File System Data Model
Baseman
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 19:35:22 CST)
Re: File System Data Model
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 20:15:33 CST)
Re: File System Data Model
Tim X
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 01:45:55 CST)
Cfp: Cikm 03
Padmini Sriniva
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 13:06:01 CST)
Recursive Query
Ray
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 14:16:27 CST)
Re: Recursive Query
Alan
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 14:26:39 CST)
Re: Recursive Query
Ray
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 11:58:26 CST)
Re: Recursive Query
Lennart Jonsson
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 16:28:25 CST)
Re: Recursive Query
Lennart Jonsson
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 16:35:44 CST)
Re: Recursive Query
--CELKO--
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 19:31:42 CST)
Large files in a database
BassGEN
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 17:14:01 CST)
Re: Large files in a database
Pablo Sanchez
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 01:18:54 CST)
Re: Large files in a database
Hans Forbrich
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 20:35:28 CST)
Re: Large files in a database
Steve Kass
(Sat Mar 22 2003 - 11:55:03 CST)
Re: Large files in a database
Pablo Sanchez
(Sat Mar 22 2003 - 18:49:13 CST)
Database Career
Bob Shea
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 21:43:03 CST)
Re: Database Career
- g r e g -
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 11:27:50 CST)
Re: Database Career
Barry
(Thu Mar 20 2003 - 11:47:07 CST)
Simple linking table question
Jon Maz
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 12:53:00 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
Tony
(Thu Mar 20 2003 - 14:40:00 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
--CELKO--
(Thu Mar 20 2003 - 17:09:31 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
Damjan S. Vujnović
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 04:52:24 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
Jon Maz
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 05:35:48 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
--CELKO--
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 12:59:01 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
Jon Maz
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 03:26:35 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
--CELKO--
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 13:08:31 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
Jon Maz
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 14:08:10 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
Lennart Jonsson
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 14:44:48 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
Nis Jorgensen
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 07:01:46 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
--CELKO--
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 13:58:57 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 02:07:56 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
Stephen
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 23:06:37 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
Tibor Karaszi
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 11:50:55 CST)
recursive index
GoranG
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 03:38:48 CST)
Re: recursive index
--CELKO--
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 13:05:41 CST)
Re: recursive index
GoranG
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:46:40 CST)
Re: recursive index
--CELKO--
(Sat Mar 22 2003 - 20:01:10 CST)
Protest against the war on Iraq
Karel Miklav
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 03:39:54 CST)
Re: Protest against the war on Iraq
stu
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 04:25:24 CST)
Re: Protest against the war on Iraq
WangKhar
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 05:21:08 CST)
Help with a query
john
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:03:30 CST)
Re: Help with a query
John Gilson
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:08:14 CST)
Re: Help with a query
john
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:46:22 CST)
Re: Help with a query
John Gilson
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 17:21:30 CST)
Re: Help with a query
john
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 17:32:44 CST)
Re: Help with a query
John Gilson
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 17:40:55 CST)
Wanted Colorado "Unwanted computers & parts "
Joseph
(Sun Mar 23 2003 - 18:55:13 CST)
Help with another query!
john
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 07:23:14 CST)
Re: Help with another query!
André Næss
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 09:06:54 CST)
Re: Help with another query!
Heinz Huber
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 01:58:14 CST)
Re: Help with another query!
john
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 09:08:15 CST)
Re: Help with another query!
Heinz Huber
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 00:54:39 CST)
How to verify that a connection to the Database has been closed?
Amardeep Verma
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 01:22:46 CST)
sql question - hierarchy
LokalST
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 08:50:36 CST)
Re: sql question - hierarchy
Lennart Jonsson
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 14:05:48 CST)
Re: sql question - hierarchy
LokalST
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 04:05:54 CST)
Re: sql question - hierarchy
Lennart Jonsson
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:48:22 CST)
Re: sql question - hierarchy
--CELKO--
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 14:01:15 CST)
Re: sql question - hierarchy
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 14:36:28 CST)
Table Structure
john
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 09:14:17 CST)
Materialised Path Heirarchy
stu
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 05:11:00 CST)
Re: Materialised Path Heirarchy
stu
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 05:32:41 CST)
Re: Materialised Path Heirarchy
David Portas
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 05:58:12 CST)
Re: Materialised Path Heirarchy
David Portas
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 06:15:04 CST)
Re: Materialised Path Heirarchy
--CELKO--
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 12:53:04 CST)
CFP: Quality of Conceptual Models
Geert Poels
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 07:18:11 CST)
PL/SQL Server Pages
dany
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:10:18 CST)
Re: PL/SQL Server Pages
shay
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 16:23:10 CST)
Re: PL/SQL Server Pages
Finn Ellebaek Nielsen
(Sat Mar 29 2003 - 03:21:01 CST)
Database design
Manik Chandra Roy
(Sat Mar 29 2003 - 07:12:56 CST)
The BOOLEAN data type
Troels Arvin
(Sat Mar 29 2003 - 21:23:10 CST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
Tony
(Sun Mar 30 2003 - 10:57:35 CST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
byrmol
(Sun Mar 30 2003 - 21:45:07 CST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
Lauri Pietarinen
(Sun Mar 30 2003 - 23:26:47 CST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
--CELKO--
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 12:11:15 CST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
Paul
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 19:21:39 CST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
Bob Badour
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 21:50:28 CST)
DB design dilemma??
Manik Chandra Roy
(Sat Mar 29 2003 - 22:21:31 CST)
Table design problem
Roy Hann
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 04:42:39 CST)
Re: Table design problem
Lennart Jonsson
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 09:07:01 CST)
Re: Table design problem
Tony
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 09:07:59 CST)
student question
Joseph Gallegos
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 16:09:34 CST)
Re: student question
Jerry Gitomer
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:53:49 CST)
Last message date
:
Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:53:49 CST
Archived on
: Fri Apr 16 2004 - 01:42:34 CDT
420 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
