Home
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by author
comp.databases.theory: by author
416 messages
:
Starting
Sat Mar 01 2003 - 08:38:47 CET,
Ending
Mon Mar 31 2003 - 20:11:15 CEST
sort by
: [
thread
] [ author ] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
- g r e g -
Re: Database Career
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 18:27:50 CET)
--CELKO--
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 20:11:15 CEST)
Re: Materialised Path Heirarchy
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 19:53:04 CET)
Re: sql question - hierarchy
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 21:01:15 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 20:58:57 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 20:08:31 CET)
Re: recursive index
(Sun Mar 23 2003 - 03:01:10 CET)
Re: recursive index
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 20:05:41 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:59:01 CET)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 00:22:57 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 00:09:31 CET)
Re: Recursive Query
(Thu Mar 20 2003 - 02:31:42 CET)
Re: Simple db table design question
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 20:25:19 CET)
Re: File System Data Model
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 21:34:04 CET)
Re: Simple db table design question
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 21:32:31 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 01:28:55 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 00:54:33 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 02:05:24 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 01:46:09 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 01:35:10 CET)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 00:37:05 CET)
Re: One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 02:18:51 CET)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 01:55:54 CET)
_at_s
Re: Please help me with Relational Database design
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 09:40:36 CET)
Re: Please help me with Relational Database design
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 22:55:44 CET)
Please help me with Relational Database design
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 22:52:18 CET)
abracad
SQL string matching
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 01:03:41 CET)
Alan
Re: Recursive Query
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 21:26:39 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 15:42:57 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 22:30:40 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:19:20 CET)
Re: Logically model never possible real world or my forever imperfect business?
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:12:46 CET)
Alan Gutierrez
Re: How to store temporal info?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 23:03:05 CET)
Re: How to store temporal info?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 05:47:04 CET)
Amal
finding a thesis topic
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 00:21:55 CET)
Amardeep Verma
How to verify that a connection to the Database has been closed?
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 08:22:46 CET)
André Næss
Re: Help with another query!
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 16:06:54 CET)
Anthony Youngman
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:16:18 CET)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:16:04 CET)
Barry
Re: Database Career
(Thu Mar 20 2003 - 18:47:07 CET)
Baseman
Re: File System Data Model
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 02:35:22 CET)
BassGEN
Large files in a database
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 00:14:01 CET)
ben
unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 06:31:16 CET)
Bernard Peek
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:44:33 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:35:01 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 11:49:30 CET)
Bob Badour
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 18:19:41 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 18:10:05 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 06:07:46 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 17:55:10 CET)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 05:57:37 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 05:52:38 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 16:54:49 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 16:52:44 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 08:50:52 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 08:06:07 CET)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 07:20:27 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 06:59:31 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 06:24:30 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 06:22:03 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 05:41:33 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 20:16:02 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 20:01:55 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:48:09 CET)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:37:57 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:33:34 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:25:08 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:21:16 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 04:55:06 CET)
Data management principles (formerly Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 04:27:20 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 03:52:57 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:20:46 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:05:42 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:03:04 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 22:49:54 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 22:15:10 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 22:13:06 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 22:02:59 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 21:02:15 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 20:57:29 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 20:43:04 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 20:40:19 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 20:37:50 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 20:24:36 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 18:05:00 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:33:26 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:31:03 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:20:46 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 06:51:57 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 06:44:17 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 06:39:17 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:53:08 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:45:47 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:35:45 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:45:03 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:56:40 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:55:12 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:40:47 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 04:01:47 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:56:41 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:54:12 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:40:45 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:38:34 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 01:29:59 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 23:41:21 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 23:28:13 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 22:53:14 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 22:48:16 CET)
Bob Shea
Database Career
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 04:43:03 CET)
byrmol
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 05:45:07 CEST)
Christian Wagner
Re: Hierarchical data
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 09:21:04 CET)
Cimarron Taylor
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 19:09:37 CET)
cose
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 22:30:10 CET)
Curtis \
Problems with SELECT *
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:40:53 CET)
D Guntermann
Re: finding a thesis topic
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 01:01:52 CET)
Damjan S. Vujnovic
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:05:44 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:59:40 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 11:47:56 CET)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:30:35 CET)
Damjan S. Vujnović
Re: Simple linking table question
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 11:52:24 CET)
Re: Simple db table design question
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 17:48:19 CET)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 11:19:45 CET)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 11:12:31 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 20:23:32 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 19:57:46 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:58:41 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 18:54:30 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:03:15 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:00:49 CET)
dany
PL/SQL Server Pages
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 20:10:18 CET)
David Portas
Re: Materialised Path Heirarchy
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 13:15:04 CET)
Re: Materialised Path Heirarchy
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 12:58:12 CET)
Dieter Nöth
Re: A DBMS implementation Question
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 09:11:08 CET)
dlperdue
Re: user defined column functions?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:20:17 CET)
Dr DOOM
Re: many to many relationship
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 01:12:16 CET)
Finn Ellebaek Nielsen
Re: PL/SQL Server Pages
(Sat Mar 29 2003 - 10:21:01 CET)
Geert Poels
CFP: Quality of Conceptual Models
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:18:11 CET)
Gianluca Hotz
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 14:12:51 CET)
GoranG
Re: recursive index
(Sat Mar 22 2003 - 02:46:40 CET)
recursive index
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 10:38:48 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 12:14:43 CET)
hakan ferhatosmanoglu
Call for Papers: CoopIS
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 19:26:09 CET)
Call for papers: ODBASE
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 19:24:48 CET)
Hans Forbrich
Re: Large files in a database
(Sat Mar 22 2003 - 03:35:28 CET)
hayseed
what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel';
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 14:33:31 CET)
Heinz Huber
Re: Help with another query!
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 07:54:39 CET)
Re: Simple db table design question
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 09:06:02 CET)
Re: Help with another query!
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 08:58:14 CET)
Henry Craven
Re: Include history in logical model or physical design
(Sat Mar 08 2003 - 22:13:22 CET)
hs
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:49:52 CET)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 23:54:38 CET)
Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 19:46:51 CET)
Ian
Re: Erm Modelling
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 02:13:10 CET)
Erm Modelling
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 14:55:56 CET)
Information
Re: File System Data Model
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 18:48:36 CET)
Jan Hidders
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 16:45:05 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:37:08 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:06:06 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 08:35:08 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 08:31:17 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 00:04:53 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:15:12 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 22:40:51 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 22:23:11 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 22:21:28 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:59:47 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:32:54 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:21:27 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 11:27:37 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:28:03 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:14:55 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:03:39 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:28:08 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:43:02 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:11:53 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:44:22 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:38:22 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:35:42 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 00:55:32 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 00:52:40 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 00:42:59 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 00:23:29 CET)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 11:16:31 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 11:01:14 CET)
Re: Please help me with Relational Database design
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 10:43:21 CET)
Re: Please help me with Relational Database design
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 23:26:14 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 15:06:21 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 09:57:45 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 23:10:12 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:00:02 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 14:58:04 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 13:38:38 CET)
Jason W. Paul
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:49:52 CET)
Re: Include history in logical model or physical design
(Sat Mar 08 2003 - 00:35:21 CET)
Jerry Gitomer
Re: Database History
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 05:51:38 CET)
Jesse
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:15:27 CET)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 04:39:42 CET)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 00:34:48 CET)
JL
Re: Need help/advice for database structure
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 14:29:56 CET)
john
Table Structure
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 16:14:17 CET)
Re: Help with another query!
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 16:08:15 CET)
Help with another query!
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 14:23:14 CET)
Re: Help with a query
(Sat Mar 22 2003 - 00:32:44 CET)
Re: Help with a query
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 23:46:22 CET)
Help with a query
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 23:03:30 CET)
Database design
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:55:41 CET)
Database design
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:51:21 CET)
Tabe Relationship
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:29:48 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 14:47:38 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 00:15:25 CET)
many to many relationship
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 22:23:22 CET)
John Gilson
Re: Help with a query
(Sat Mar 22 2003 - 00:40:55 CET)
Re: Help with a query
(Sat Mar 22 2003 - 00:21:30 CET)
Re: Help with a query
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 23:08:14 CET)
Re: One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 21:12:04 CET)
Re: How to store temporal info?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 20:43:53 CET)
Re: How to store temporal info?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 15:18:49 CET)
Jon Maz
Re: Simple linking table question
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 21:08:10 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 10:26:35 CET)
Re: Simple db table design question
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 12:46:33 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 12:35:48 CET)
Simple linking table question
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 19:53:00 CET)
Re: Simple db table design question
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 11:03:42 CET)
Re: Simple db table design question
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 18:11:23 CET)
Simple db table design question
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 16:17:43 CET)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:55:52 CET)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:52:34 CET)
Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 15:28:26 CET)
Jonathan Leffler
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 06:16:38 CET)
Joseph
Wanted Colorado "Unwanted computers & parts "
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 01:55:13 CET)
Karel Miklav
Protest against the war on Iraq
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 10:39:54 CET)
karl wettin
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 11:53:03 CET)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 11:51:20 CET)
Re: finding a thesis topic
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 03:01:21 CET)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:03:56 CET)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 02:24:23 CET)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 23:35:08 CET)
Re: Erm Modelling
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 19:30:32 CET)
Klinton Lee
Re: what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel';
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 08:25:39 CET)
Larry Coon
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:59:31 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 22:43:23 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 00:49:30 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 23:53:38 CET)
laura
Help!
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 22:48:39 CET)
Lauri Pietarinen
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 07:26:47 CEST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 00:26:33 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:42:55 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:36:52 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 07:34:51 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 07:20:34 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 06:45:06 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:24:48 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 20:24:40 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 19:54:58 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 11:23:39 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 09:05:13 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 01:52:21 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 23:03:42 CET)
Re: SQL string matching
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 08:02:34 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 22:25:26 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 19:14:40 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 19:14:31 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:55:25 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 13:31:19 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 13:22:01 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 07:32:03 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 17:14:28 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:25:45 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 08:36:05 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 19:45:54 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 08:08:56 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:50:49 CET)
Lennart Jonsson
Re: Table design problem
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 17:07:01 CEST)
Re: sql question - hierarchy
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 18:48:22 CET)
Re: Simple linking table question
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 21:44:48 CET)
Re: sql question - hierarchy
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 21:05:48 CET)
Re: Recursive Query
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 23:28:25 CET)
Re: Recursive Query
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 23:35:44 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:57:12 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 23:41:08 CET)
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:56:50 CET)
Re: SQL string matching
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 11:55:18 CET)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 21:21:24 CET)
Re: How to store temporal info?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 21:36:40 CET)
Re: How to store temporal info?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 19:38:05 CET)
Re: How to store temporal info?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:33:21 CET)
How to store temporal info?
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 19:34:18 CET)
Lieut_Data
Re: Database History
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:19:10 CET)
Re: Database History
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:12:00 CET)
Database History
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 01:12:56 CET)
LokalST
Re: sql question - hierarchy
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:05:54 CET)
sql question - hierarchy
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 15:50:36 CET)
Manik Chandra Roy
Database design
(Sat Mar 29 2003 - 14:12:56 CET)
DB design dilemma??
(Sun Mar 30 2003 - 06:21:31 CEST)
max101000010.01000101
Re: sample datasets
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 15:49:17 CET)
sample datasets
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:57:49 CET)
Mike Sherrill
Re: Logically model never possible real world or my forever imperfect business?
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 19:03:37 CET)
Mikito Harakiri
Re: sql question - hierarchy
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 21:36:28 CET)
Re: Hash Join vs. Nested Loops
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 01:38:57 CET)
Re: File System Data Model
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 03:15:33 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 02:40:38 CET)
Re: what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel';
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 18:28:23 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 08:41:11 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 06:41:48 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 02:18:09 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 21:42:47 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:55:57 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:56:13 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:32:57 CET)
SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:07:52 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 22:36:07 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 22:18:53 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 21:48:58 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 21:42:34 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 21:18:14 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 19:43:50 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 19:36:04 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 19:31:25 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 18:32:14 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:27:46 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 22:16:42 CET)
N. Shamsundar
Re: what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel';
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 16:21:21 CET)
Re: sample datasets
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 21:11:25 CET)
Neo
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 16:39:02 CET)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 19:14:47 CET)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 05:23:05 CET)
Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 03:50:42 CET)
Re: Relational/hierarchical data problem
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 23:23:09 CET)
nippur
Re: One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:29:15 CET)
One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 19:09:30 CET)
Nis Jorgensen
Re: Simple linking table question
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 14:01:46 CET)
oferbu
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 07:32:22 CET)
Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 11:07:14 CET)
OlegJay
Re: How to store temporal info?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 21:47:04 CET)
Include history in logical model or physical design
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 17:04:39 CET)
Logically model never possible real world or my forever imperfect business?
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 18:58:58 CET)
Oodie
Need help/advice for database structure
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 07:02:46 CET)
owen
Problem of RDBMS's implementation
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 13:01:07 CET)
Re: A DBMS implementation Question
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 15:23:57 CET)
Pablo Sanchez
Re: Large files in a database
(Sun Mar 23 2003 - 01:49:13 CET)
Re: Large files in a database
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 08:18:54 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 23:40:55 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 20:40:12 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 20:38:04 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 20:24:56 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:40:06 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 18:04:57 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 18:03:37 CET)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:58:24 CET)
Re: Database History
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:40:45 CET)
Re: Database History
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 06:16:52 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 17:36:22 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 14:32:48 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 22:40:51 CET)
Padmini Sriniva
Cfp: Cikm 03
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 20:06:01 CET)
Paul Vernon
Re: many to many relationship
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 18:57:35 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 16:20:34 CET)
Re: many to many relationship
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 11:43:40 CET)
Re: finding a thesis topic
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 11:12:54 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:17:13 CET)
Re: Need help/advice for database structure
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 19:51:24 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 19:18:28 CET)
Peter
File System Data Model
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 16:19:25 CET)
Peter Johal
Re: db design question
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 22:56:02 CET)
Peter Koch Larsen
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 11:24:01 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 12:39:56 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 13:44:19 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:51:59 CET)
programmer
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 11:51:05 CET)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 11:49:37 CET)
ProNetworkPC
Free Support, All OSes, All Applications
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 14:33:36 CET)
proxy.mzh.de
Re: Database design
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 22:05:32 CET)
Ray
Re: Recursive Query
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 18:58:26 CET)
Recursive Query
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 21:16:27 CET)
RayD
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 22:48:46 CET)
Richard Wheeldon
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 01:22:01 CET)
Re: SQL string matching
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 01:31:26 CET)
Roy Hann
Table design problem
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 12:42:39 CEST)
Scott David Daniels
Re: Hash Join vs. Nested Loops
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 08:38:47 CET)
shay
Re: PL/SQL Server Pages
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 23:23:10 CET)
Stephen
Re: Simple linking table question
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 06:06:37 CET)
Steve Kass
Re: Large files in a database
(Sat Mar 22 2003 - 18:55:03 CET)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 07:39:10 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 09:32:49 CET)
Re: Need help/advice for database structure
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 08:41:43 CET)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 08:31:41 CET)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 03:15:41 CET)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 02:56:29 CET)
stu
Re: Materialised Path Heirarchy
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 12:32:41 CET)
Materialised Path Heirarchy
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 12:11:00 CET)
Re: Protest against the war on Iraq
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 11:25:24 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:03:37 CET)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 09:48:56 CET)
t
Re: db design question
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 18:06:08 CET)
db design question
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 20:42:16 CET)
Theo Peterbroers
Re: Help!
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 10:38:05 CET)
Tibor Karaszi
Re: Simple linking table question
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 18:50:55 CET)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 18:53:00 CET)
Tim X
Re: File System Data Model
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 08:45:55 CET)
Re: Simple db table design question
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 08:41:44 CET)
Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
Re: Simple linking table question
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 09:07:56 CET)
Tony
Re: Table design problem
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 17:07:59 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Sun Mar 30 2003 - 18:57:35 CEST)
Re: Simple linking table question
(Thu Mar 20 2003 - 21:40:00 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 15:43:50 CET)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 18:20:55 CET)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 18:54:58 CET)
tretasdehr
Re: primary key - tag numbers
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:13:23 CET)
Troels Arvin
The BOOLEAN data type
(Sun Mar 30 2003 - 05:23:10 CEST)
Undercover Elephant
CFP: XML Database Symposium at VLDB 2003
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 01:19:57 CET)
[ANN] New Book on XML Data Management
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 00:40:57 CET)
Re: Database design
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:59:58 CET)
Re: finding a thesis topic
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 01:04:03 CET)
WangKhar
Re: Protest against the war on Iraq
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 12:21:08 CET)
WeatherForums
Like to Discuss Weather?-Come Join! Heres our Newsletter for Sunday!
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 08:42:55 CET)
Woody
Re: Database design
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 09:36:18 CET)
Last message date
:
Mon Mar 31 2003 - 20:11:15 CEST
Archived on
: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 10:52:33 CEST
416 messages
sort by
: [
thread
] [ author ] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
.::
Blogger Home
::
Wiki Home
::
Forum Home
::
Privacy
::
Contact
::.