Oracle FAQ
Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" SRC="http://www.orafaq.net/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?jscript"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <A HREF="http://www.orafaq.net/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?banner=NonSSI;page=01" TARGET="_blank" onMouseOver="window.status='Click here! Support the Oracle FAQ by supporting our sponsors.';return true" onMouseOut="window.status='';return true"> <IMG SRC="http://www.orafaq.net/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?page=01" HEIGHT=60 WIDTH=468 ALT="Support the Oracle FAQ by supporting our sponsors. Click here!" BORDER=0> </A> </NOSCRIPT>
Home
->
Community
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by author
comp.databases.theory: by author
420 messages
:
Starting
Sat Mar 01 2003 - 01:38:47 CST,
Ending
Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:53:49 CST
sort by
: [
thread
] [ author ] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
- g r e g -
Re: Database Career
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 11:27:50 CST)
--CELKO--
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 12:11:15 CST)
Re: Materialised Path Heirarchy
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 12:53:04 CST)
Re: sql question - hierarchy
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 14:01:15 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 13:58:57 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 13:08:31 CST)
Re: recursive index
(Sat Mar 22 2003 - 20:01:10 CST)
Re: recursive index
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 13:05:41 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 12:59:01 CST)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
(Thu Mar 20 2003 - 17:22:57 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
(Thu Mar 20 2003 - 17:09:31 CST)
Re: Recursive Query
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 19:31:42 CST)
Re: Simple db table design question
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 13:25:19 CST)
Re: File System Data Model
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 14:34:04 CST)
Re: Simple db table design question
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 14:32:31 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 18:28:55 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 17:54:33 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:05:24 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 18:46:09 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 18:35:10 CST)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 17:37:05 CST)
Re: One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 19:18:51 CST)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 18:55:54 CST)
_at_s
Re: Please help me with Relational Database design
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 02:40:36 CST)
Re: Please help me with Relational Database design
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 15:55:44 CST)
Please help me with Relational Database design
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 15:52:18 CST)
abracad
SQL string matching
(Sat Mar 08 2003 - 18:03:41 CST)
Alan
Re: Recursive Query
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 14:26:39 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 08:42:57 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 15:30:40 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 08:19:20 CST)
Re: Logically model never possible real world or my forever imperfect business?
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 08:12:46 CST)
Alan Gutierrez
Re: How to store temporal info?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 16:03:05 CST)
Re: How to store temporal info?
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 22:47:04 CST)
Amal
finding a thesis topic
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 17:21:55 CST)
Amardeep Verma
How to verify that a connection to the Database has been closed?
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 01:22:46 CST)
André Næss
Re: Help with another query!
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 09:06:54 CST)
Anthony Youngman
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 05:16:18 CST)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:16:04 CST)
Barry
Re: Database Career
(Thu Mar 20 2003 - 11:47:07 CST)
Baseman
Re: File System Data Model
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 19:35:22 CST)
BassGEN
Large files in a database
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 17:14:01 CST)
ben
unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:31:16 CST)
Bernard Peek
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:44:33 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:35:01 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 04:49:30 CST)
Bob Badour
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 21:50:28 CST)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 11:19:41 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 11:10:05 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 23:07:46 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 10:55:10 CST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:57:37 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:52:38 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 09:54:49 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 09:52:44 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 01:50:52 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 01:06:07 CST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 00:20:27 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:59:31 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:24:30 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:22:03 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 22:41:33 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:16:02 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:01:55 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:48:09 CST)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:37:57 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:33:34 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:25:08 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:21:16 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 21:55:06 CST)
Data management principles (formerly Why using "Group By")
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 21:27:20 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 20:52:57 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:20:46 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:05:42 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:03:04 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:49:54 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:15:10 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:13:06 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:02:59 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 14:02:15 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:57:29 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:43:04 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:40:19 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:37:50 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:24:36 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 11:05:00 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:33:26 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:31:03 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:20:46 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:51:57 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:44:17 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:39:17 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:53:08 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:45:47 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:35:45 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:45:03 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:56:40 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:55:12 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:40:47 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 21:01:47 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 20:56:41 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 09:54:12 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 09:40:45 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 09:38:34 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:29:59 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:41:21 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:28:13 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:53:14 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:48:16 CST)
Bob Shea
Database Career
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 21:43:03 CST)
byrmol
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Sun Mar 30 2003 - 21:45:07 CST)
Christian Wagner
Re: Hierarchical data
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 02:21:04 CST)
Cimarron Taylor
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:09:37 CST)
cose
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:30:10 CST)
Curtis \
Problems with SELECT *
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:40:53 CST)
D Guntermann
Re: finding a thesis topic
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 18:01:52 CST)
Damjan S. Vujnovic
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:05:44 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 07:59:40 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 04:47:56 CST)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 10:30:35 CST)
Damjan S. Vujnović
Re: Simple linking table question
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 04:52:24 CST)
Re: Simple db table design question
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 10:48:19 CST)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 04:19:45 CST)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 04:12:31 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:23:32 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:57:46 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 05:58:41 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 11:54:30 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:03:15 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 11:00:49 CST)
dany
PL/SQL Server Pages
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 13:10:18 CST)
David Portas
Re: Materialised Path Heirarchy
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 06:15:04 CST)
Re: Materialised Path Heirarchy
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 05:58:12 CST)
Dieter Nöth
Re: A DBMS implementation Question
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 02:11:08 CST)
dlperdue
Re: user defined column functions?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:20:17 CST)
Dr DOOM
Re: many to many relationship
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:12:16 CST)
Finn Ellebaek Nielsen
Re: PL/SQL Server Pages
(Sat Mar 29 2003 - 03:21:01 CST)
Geert Poels
CFP: Quality of Conceptual Models
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 07:18:11 CST)
Gianluca Hotz
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 07:12:51 CST)
GoranG
Re: recursive index
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 19:46:40 CST)
recursive index
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 03:38:48 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 05:14:43 CST)
hakan ferhatosmanoglu
Call for Papers: CoopIS
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 12:26:09 CST)
Call for papers: ODBASE
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 12:24:48 CST)
Hans Forbrich
Re: Large files in a database
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 20:35:28 CST)
hayseed
what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel';
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 07:33:31 CST)
Heinz Huber
Re: Help with another query!
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 00:54:39 CST)
Re: Simple db table design question
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 02:06:02 CST)
Re: Help with another query!
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 01:58:14 CST)
Henry Craven
Re: Include history in logical model or physical design
(Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:13:22 CST)
hs
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 07:49:52 CST)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 16:54:38 CST)
Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 12:46:51 CST)
Ian
Re: Erm Modelling
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 19:13:10 CST)
Erm Modelling
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 07:55:56 CST)
Information
Re: File System Data Model
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 11:48:36 CST)
Jan Hidders
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 09:45:05 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 02:37:08 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 02:06:06 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 01:35:08 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 01:31:17 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 17:04:53 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:15:12 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:40:51 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:23:11 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:21:28 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:59:47 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:32:54 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:21:27 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 04:27:37 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:28:03 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:14:55 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:03:39 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 11:28:08 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:43:02 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:11:53 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 06:44:22 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 06:38:22 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 06:35:42 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:55:32 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:52:40 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:42:59 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:23:29 CST)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 04:16:31 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 04:01:14 CST)
Re: Please help me with Relational Database design
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 03:43:21 CST)
Re: Please help me with Relational Database design
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 16:26:14 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 08:06:21 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 02:57:45 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 16:10:12 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 05:00:02 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 07:58:04 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 06:38:38 CST)
Jason W. Paul
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:49:52 CST)
Re: Include history in logical model or physical design
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 17:35:21 CST)
Jerry Gitomer
Re: student question
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:53:49 CST)
Re: Database History
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 22:51:38 CST)
Jesse
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 03:15:27 CST)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 21:39:42 CST)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 17:34:48 CST)
JL
Re: Need help/advice for database structure
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 07:29:56 CST)
john
Database design
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 07:55:41 CST)
Table Structure
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 09:14:17 CST)
Re: Help with another query!
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 09:08:15 CST)
Help with another query!
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 07:23:14 CST)
Re: Help with a query
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 17:32:44 CST)
Re: Help with a query
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:46:22 CST)
Help with a query
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:03:30 CST)
Database design
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 07:51:21 CST)
Tabe Relationship
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 03:29:48 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 07:47:38 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:15:25 CST)
many to many relationship
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 15:23:22 CST)
John Gilson
Re: Help with a query
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 17:40:55 CST)
Re: Help with a query
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 17:21:30 CST)
Re: Help with a query
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 16:08:14 CST)
Re: One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 14:12:04 CST)
Re: How to store temporal info?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 13:43:53 CST)
Re: How to store temporal info?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 08:18:49 CST)
Jon Maz
Re: Simple linking table question
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 14:08:10 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 03:26:35 CST)
Re: Simple db table design question
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 05:46:33 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 05:35:48 CST)
Simple linking table question
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 12:53:00 CST)
Re: Simple db table design question
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 04:03:42 CST)
Re: Simple db table design question
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 11:11:23 CST)
Simple db table design question
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 09:17:43 CST)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 09:55:52 CST)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 09:52:34 CST)
Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 08:28:26 CST)
Jonathan Leffler
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 23:16:38 CST)
Joseph
Wanted Colorado "Unwanted computers & parts "
(Sun Mar 23 2003 - 18:55:13 CST)
Joseph Gallegos
student question
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 16:09:34 CST)
Karel Miklav
Protest against the war on Iraq
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 03:39:54 CST)
karl wettin
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 04:53:03 CST)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 04:51:20 CST)
Re: finding a thesis topic
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 20:01:21 CST)
Re: Database design qn for one-to-many relationship
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 10:03:56 CST)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 19:24:23 CST)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 16:35:08 CST)
Re: Erm Modelling
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 12:30:32 CST)
Klinton Lee
Re: what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel';
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 01:25:39 CST)
Larry Coon
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:59:31 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:43:23 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 17:49:30 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 16:53:38 CST)
laura
Help!
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 15:48:39 CST)
Lauri Pietarinen
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Sun Mar 30 2003 - 23:26:47 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 17:26:33 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:42:55 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 08:36:52 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 00:34:51 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 00:20:34 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:45:06 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:24:48 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:24:40 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:54:58 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 04:23:39 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 02:05:13 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:52:21 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:03:42 CST)
Re: SQL string matching
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 01:02:34 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 15:25:26 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 12:14:40 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 12:14:31 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 07:55:25 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 06:31:19 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 06:22:01 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 00:32:03 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:14:28 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 03:25:45 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 01:36:05 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 12:45:54 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 01:08:56 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 04:50:49 CST)
Lennart Jonsson
Re: Table design problem
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 09:07:01 CST)
Re: sql question - hierarchy
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:48:22 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 14:44:48 CST)
Re: sql question - hierarchy
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 14:05:48 CST)
Re: Recursive Query
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 16:28:25 CST)
Re: Recursive Query
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 16:35:44 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:57:12 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:41:08 CST)
Re: Tabe Relationship
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 06:56:50 CST)
Re: SQL string matching
(Sun Mar 09 2003 - 04:55:18 CST)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 14:21:24 CST)
Re: How to store temporal info?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 14:36:40 CST)
Re: How to store temporal info?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:38:05 CST)
Re: How to store temporal info?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 03:33:21 CST)
How to store temporal info?
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 12:34:18 CST)
Lieut_Data
Re: Database History
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:19:10 CST)
Re: Database History
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:12:00 CST)
Database History
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 18:12:56 CST)
LokalST
Re: sql question - hierarchy
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 04:05:54 CST)
sql question - hierarchy
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 08:50:36 CST)
Manik Chandra Roy
Database design
(Sat Mar 29 2003 - 07:12:56 CST)
DB design dilemma??
(Sat Mar 29 2003 - 22:21:31 CST)
max101000010.01000101
Re: sample datasets
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 08:49:17 CST)
sample datasets
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 10:57:49 CST)
Mike Sherrill
Re: Logically model never possible real world or my forever imperfect business?
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:03:37 CST)
Mikito Harakiri
Re: sql question - hierarchy
(Wed Mar 26 2003 - 14:36:28 CST)
Re: Hash Join vs. Nested Loops
(Thu Mar 20 2003 - 18:38:57 CST)
Re: File System Data Model
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 20:15:33 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 19:40:38 CST)
Re: what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel';
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 11:28:23 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 01:41:11 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 23:41:48 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:18:09 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 14:42:47 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:55:57 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:56:13 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:32:57 CST)
SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:07:52 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:36:07 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:18:53 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 14:48:58 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 14:42:34 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 14:18:14 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:43:50 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:36:04 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:31:25 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 11:32:14 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:27:46 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:16:42 CST)
N. Shamsundar
Re: what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel';
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 09:21:21 CST)
Re: sample datasets
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 14:11:25 CST)
Neo
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 09:39:02 CST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 12:14:47 CST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:23:05 CST)
Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 20:50:42 CST)
Re: Relational/hierarchical data problem
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 16:23:09 CST)
nippur
Re: One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 07:29:15 CST)
One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:09:30 CST)
Nis Jorgensen
Re: Simple linking table question
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 07:01:46 CST)
oferbu
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 00:32:22 CST)
Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 04:07:14 CST)
OlegJay
Re: How to store temporal info?
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:47:04 CST)
Include history in logical model or physical design
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 10:04:39 CST)
Logically model never possible real world or my forever imperfect business?
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 11:58:58 CST)
Oodie
Need help/advice for database structure
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 00:02:46 CST)
owen
Problem of RDBMS's implementation
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 06:01:07 CST)
Re: A DBMS implementation Question
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 08:23:57 CST)
Pablo Sanchez
Re: Large files in a database
(Sat Mar 22 2003 - 18:49:13 CST)
Re: Large files in a database
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 01:18:54 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 16:40:55 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:40:12 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:38:04 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:24:56 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:40:06 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 11:04:57 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 11:03:37 CST)
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:58:24 CST)
Re: Database History
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:40:45 CST)
Re: Database History
(Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:16:52 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 10:36:22 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 07:32:48 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
(Wed Mar 05 2003 - 15:40:51 CST)
Padmini Sriniva
Cfp: Cikm 03
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 13:06:01 CST)
Paul
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 19:21:39 CST)
Paul Vernon
Re: many to many relationship
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 11:57:35 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 09:20:34 CST)
Re: many to many relationship
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 04:43:40 CST)
Re: finding a thesis topic
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 04:12:54 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Tue Mar 04 2003 - 07:17:13 CST)
Re: Need help/advice for database structure
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:51:24 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:18:28 CST)
Peter
File System Data Model
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 09:19:25 CST)
Peter Johal
Re: db design question
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 15:56:02 CST)
Peter Koch Larsen
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 04:24:01 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 05:39:56 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Sat Mar 15 2003 - 06:44:19 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 12:51:59 CST)
programmer
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 04:51:05 CST)
Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables.
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 04:49:37 CST)
ProNetworkPC
Free Support, All OSes, All Applications
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 07:33:36 CST)
proxy.mzh.de
Re: Database design
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 15:05:32 CST)
Ray
Re: Recursive Query
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 11:58:26 CST)
Recursive Query
(Tue Mar 18 2003 - 14:16:27 CST)
RayD
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:48:46 CST)
Richard Wheeldon
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 18:22:01 CST)
Re: SQL string matching
(Wed Mar 12 2003 - 18:31:26 CST)
Roy Hann
Table design problem
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 04:42:39 CST)
Scott David Daniels
Re: Hash Join vs. Nested Loops
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 01:38:47 CST)
shay
Re: PL/SQL Server Pages
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 16:23:10 CST)
Stephen
Re: Simple linking table question
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 23:06:37 CST)
Steve Kass
Re: Large files in a database
(Sat Mar 22 2003 - 11:55:03 CST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 00:39:10 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 02:32:49 CST)
Re: Need help/advice for database structure
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 01:41:43 CST)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 01:31:41 CST)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database.
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 20:15:41 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?
(Sun Mar 02 2003 - 19:56:29 CST)
stu
Re: Materialised Path Heirarchy
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 05:32:41 CST)
Materialised Path Heirarchy
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 05:11:00 CST)
Re: Protest against the war on Iraq
(Fri Mar 21 2003 - 04:25:24 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 05:03:37 CST)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
(Fri Mar 07 2003 - 02:48:56 CST)
t
Re: db design question
(Mon Mar 17 2003 - 11:06:08 CST)
db design question
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:42:16 CST)
Theo Peterbroers
Re: Help!
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 03:38:05 CST)
Tibor Karaszi
Re: Simple linking table question
(Fri Mar 28 2003 - 11:50:55 CST)
Re: SQL (was: Why using "Group By")
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 11:53:00 CST)
Tim X
Re: File System Data Model
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 01:45:55 CST)
Re: Simple db table design question
(Tue Mar 25 2003 - 01:41:44 CST)
Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
Re: Simple linking table question
(Thu Mar 27 2003 - 02:07:56 CST)
Tony
Re: Table design problem
(Mon Mar 31 2003 - 09:07:59 CST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Sun Mar 30 2003 - 10:57:35 CST)
Re: Simple linking table question
(Thu Mar 20 2003 - 14:40:00 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Wed Mar 19 2003 - 08:43:50 CST)
Re: Why using "Group By"
(Thu Mar 13 2003 - 11:20:55 CST)
Re: DB Design Principles for RDBMS
(Thu Mar 06 2003 - 11:54:58 CST)
tretasdehr
Re: primary key - tag numbers
(Mon Mar 03 2003 - 05:13:23 CST)
Troels Arvin
The BOOLEAN data type
(Sat Mar 29 2003 - 21:23:10 CST)
Undercover Elephant
CFP: XML Database Symposium at VLDB 2003
(Fri Mar 14 2003 - 18:19:57 CST)
[ANN] New Book on XML Data Management
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:40:57 CST)
Re: Database design
(Mon Mar 10 2003 - 07:59:58 CST)
Re: finding a thesis topic
(Sat Mar 01 2003 - 18:04:03 CST)
WangKhar
Re: Protest against the war on Iraq
(Mon Mar 24 2003 - 05:21:08 CST)
WeatherForums
Like to Discuss Weather?-Come Join! Heres our Newsletter for Sunday!
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 01:42:55 CST)
Woody
Re: Database design
(Sun Mar 16 2003 - 02:36:18 CST)
Last message date
:
Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:53:49 CST
Archived on
: Fri Apr 16 2004 - 01:42:34 CDT
420 messages
sort by
: [
thread
] [ author ] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
