Re: what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel';

From: Mikito Harakiri <mikharakiri_at_ywho.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 09:28:23 -0800
Message-ID: <GGnda.16$NS1.111_at_news.oracle.com>

Concurrent==Parallel==No Partial Order among Events

Synchronized==Less Concurrent==Some Partial Order among Events

Sequential==Maximally Synchronized==Totally Ordered

"N. Shamsundar" <shamsundar_at_uh.edu> wrote in message news:3E75E7F1.AB4B2011_at_uh.edu...
> I don't know if this is specific enough:
>
> Concurrent => Synchronous & Parallel
>
> N. Shamsundar
> University of Houston
>
> hayseed wrote:
> >
> > i was confused by 'concurrent' and 'parallel'.Do they have the
> > same meaning?
> >
> > --
> > Posted via http://dbforums.com
Received on Mon Mar 17 2003 - 18:28:23 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: --CELKO--: "Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?"
Previous message: Bob Badour: "Re: unique primary key shared between multiple tables."
Maybe in reply to: hayseed: "what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel';"
In reply to N. Shamsundar: "Re: what's the difference between 'concurrent' and 'parallel';"
Next in thread: --CELKO--: "Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message