Home
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
474 messages
:
Starting
Sun Apr 01 2007 - 00:48:10 CEST,
Ending
Mon Apr 30 2007 - 18:49:34 CEST
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Problems w/ SQL Insert with a static parm
littldo_at_gmail.com
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 00:48:10 CEST)
Re: Problems w/ SQL Insert with a static parm
Bob Badour
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 01:08:17 CEST)
Re: Problems w/ SQL Insert with a static parm
Lennart
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 03:38:19 CEST)
for fawne: extremely interesting nntp groups - ayho - (1/1)
nat
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 01:06:33 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Bruce C. Baker
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 03:04:10 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:27:50 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:24:50 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:44:20 CEST)
Re: Bidirectional Binary Self-Joins
David Cressey
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 07:19:51 CEST)
Re: Bidirectional Binary Self-Joins
Marshall
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 10:11:22 CEST)
Re: Bidirectional Binary Self-Joins
David Cressey
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 07:26:52 CEST)
Re: Bidirectional Binary Self-Joins
Marshall
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 10:14:45 CEST)
Re: Bidirectional Binary Self-Joins
David Cressey
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 12:35:37 CEST)
Re: Bidirectional Binary Self-Joins
JOG
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 16:43:16 CEST)
Re: Bidirectional Binary Self-Joins
paul c
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 16:49:33 CEST)
Re: Bidirectional Binary Self-Joins
Marshall
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 17:14:28 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 00:00:32 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 01:00:45 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 01:02:07 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 01:29:19 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
paul c
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 02:58:41 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 03:46:51 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
paul c
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 04:53:37 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 05:11:41 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
paul c
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 05:42:57 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 19:17:35 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
paul c
(Tue Apr 03 2007 - 01:29:25 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
paul c
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 04:55:37 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 15:34:16 CEST)
Re: Infix operator names
Bruce C. Baker
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 01:39:00 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Bruce C. Baker
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 01:46:41 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
paul c
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 15:05:21 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
-CELKO-
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 15:19:22 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 18:08:15 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 18:09:35 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 19:07:50 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 18:12:53 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 19:05:15 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 20:31:59 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 21:00:43 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 22:13:19 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 23:25:13 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
paul c
(Tue Apr 03 2007 - 01:07:17 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 03 2007 - 14:14:02 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
Bruce C. Baker
(Tue Apr 03 2007 - 00:32:04 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
paul c
(Tue Apr 03 2007 - 01:11:24 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 03 2007 - 03:12:23 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
Marshall
(Tue Apr 03 2007 - 04:45:22 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 03 2007 - 14:01:59 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 03 2007 - 14:57:33 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
JOG
(Tue Apr 03 2007 - 12:31:31 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 03 2007 - 14:22:17 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
jlowery
(Sat Apr 14 2007 - 22:16:53 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
Drago Ganic
(Tue Apr 03 2007 - 06:50:33 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
David Cressey
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 07:13:30 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 12:51:23 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
David Cressey
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 07:20:35 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
David Cressey
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 07:35:10 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
David Cressey
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 13:26:38 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
jefftyzzer
(Wed Apr 04 2007 - 02:53:35 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Wed Apr 04 2007 - 04:15:11 CEST)
Re: SQL Joins question
David Portas
(Thu Apr 05 2007 - 13:57:25 CEST)
Re: SQL Joins question
Cimode
(Thu Apr 05 2007 - 16:09:34 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
jefftyzzer
(Thu Apr 05 2007 - 18:33:56 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu Apr 05 2007 - 19:00:57 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
mAsterdam
(Thu Apr 05 2007 - 19:45:01 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
Bruce C. Baker
(Thu Apr 05 2007 - 19:56:10 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu Apr 05 2007 - 20:22:52 CEST)
Re: Database design of stock prices?
DBMS_Plumber
(Thu Apr 05 2007 - 23:03:31 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
Bruce C. Baker
(Fri Apr 06 2007 - 00:38:12 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
Jonathan Leffler
(Thu Apr 05 2007 - 07:25:14 CEST)
Re: data mining
jefftyzzer
(Sat Apr 07 2007 - 01:01:40 CEST)
Re: Database design of stock prices?
jefftyzzer
(Sat Apr 07 2007 - 01:15:49 CEST)
Re: Database design of stock prices?
Bob Badour
(Sat Apr 07 2007 - 02:18:56 CEST)
Re: Database design of stock prices?
jefftyzzer
(Mon Apr 09 2007 - 22:17:20 CEST)
Re: Database design of stock prices?
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 09 2007 - 23:14:58 CEST)
Re: Database design of stock prices?
knguyen
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 05:00:53 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
paul c
(Sun Apr 08 2007 - 17:54:15 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Marshall
(Sun Apr 08 2007 - 19:03:35 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Mon Apr 09 2007 - 21:06:02 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Marshall
(Sun Apr 15 2007 - 17:48:03 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Marshall
(Sun Apr 15 2007 - 17:57:14 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Marshall
(Sun Apr 15 2007 - 19:28:22 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 19:24:58 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Marshall
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 22:49:08 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 23:33:24 CEST)
Re: Where is everybody?
David Cressey
(Tue Apr 10 2007 - 02:58:38 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
Guy
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 00:32:01 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
Bob Badour
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 00:39:08 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
Bob Badour
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 00:41:30 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
Marshall
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 01:47:01 CEST)
Re: Where is everybody?
Keith H Duggar
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 03:39:13 CEST)
Re: Where is everybody?
Bob Badour
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 04:01:04 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
David Cressey
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 08:51:49 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
Lennart
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 09:03:50 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
Bob Badour
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 14:28:04 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
David Cressey
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 13:22:11 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
Guy
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 14:36:34 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
Lennart
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 19:07:59 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
Guy
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 20:59:50 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
Lennart
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 21:04:26 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
Lennart
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 21:09:07 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
Guy
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 22:45:33 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
Lennart
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 21:06:48 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
Brian Selzer
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 14:24:24 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
David Cressey
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 14:54:39 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
David Cressey
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 14:55:53 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
Bob Badour
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 15:18:09 CEST)
Re: Where is everybody?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Thu Apr 12 2007 - 00:19:55 CEST)
Re: Where is everybody?
Marshall
(Sun Apr 15 2007 - 23:05:11 CEST)
Re: Where is everybody?
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 04:01:54 CEST)
Re: Where is everybody?
Matthias Klaey
(Thu Apr 12 2007 - 01:45:57 CEST)
Re: Where is everybody?
Marshall
(Sun Apr 15 2007 - 19:36:16 CEST)
Re: Where is everybody?
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 15:34:41 CEST)
Re: Where is everybody?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 19:13:50 CEST)
Re: Where is everybody?
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 19:28:55 CEST)
Re: Where is everybody?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 21:08:54 CEST)
Re: Where is everybody?
Marshall
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 22:06:42 CEST)
Re: Where is everybody?
Marshall
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 22:48:19 CEST)
Re: Entity Relationship Diagrams
Bernard Peek
(Thu Apr 12 2007 - 14:40:46 CEST)
Re: Theoretical definition for the number of unique values?
sqlservernewbie_at_yahoo.com
(Fri Apr 13 2007 - 03:23:07 CEST)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
beachmountain_at_hotmail.com
(Fri Apr 13 2007 - 09:47:13 CEST)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
beachmountain_at_hotmail.com
(Fri Apr 13 2007 - 09:50:56 CEST)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
Brian Selzer
(Fri Apr 13 2007 - 13:45:21 CEST)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
David Cressey
(Fri Apr 13 2007 - 16:24:22 CEST)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
paul c
(Sat Apr 14 2007 - 00:45:08 CEST)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
beachmountain_at_hotmail.com
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 08:57:38 CEST)
Re: Theoretical definition for the number of unique values?
Cimode
(Fri Apr 13 2007 - 16:26:42 CEST)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
David Cressey
(Fri Apr 13 2007 - 16:30:16 CEST)
Re: Theoretical definition for the number of unique values?
William Robertson
(Sat Apr 14 2007 - 07:23:02 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 03:09:57 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 03:25:05 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 14:56:51 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Marshall
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 16:15:43 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 18:51:26 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 00:17:16 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 14:29:24 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 14:32:43 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 15:05:56 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 15:12:30 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 15:21:42 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 15:25:23 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 15:37:16 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 16:50:04 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 23:25:25 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Bob Badour
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 02:47:44 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 03:31:20 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
David BL
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 04:08:17 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 04:22:56 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
David BL
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 15:36:10 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
David BL
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 15:40:27 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Bob Badour
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 15:41:57 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 15:58:56 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Sun Apr 22 2007 - 06:17:58 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Sun Apr 22 2007 - 07:14:49 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Bob Badour
(Sun Apr 22 2007 - 14:47:35 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Sun Apr 22 2007 - 18:15:24 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Bob Badour
(Sun Apr 22 2007 - 19:33:00 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Sun Apr 22 2007 - 19:56:30 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Sun Apr 22 2007 - 20:08:15 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
mAsterdam
(Mon Apr 23 2007 - 01:14:54 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Mon Apr 23 2007 - 02:52:09 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Mon Apr 23 2007 - 03:01:29 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Sun Apr 22 2007 - 23:25:45 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 23 2007 - 03:04:25 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Mon Apr 23 2007 - 23:14:17 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 23 2007 - 23:32:43 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Mon Apr 23 2007 - 23:47:16 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 00:13:32 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 00:28:00 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
David BL
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 08:19:39 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
David BL
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 13:07:12 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
David BL
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 16:02:11 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 14:52:36 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 15:13:17 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
David BL
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 09:09:55 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Brian Selzer
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 05:16:52 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
paul c
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 06:10:06 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Marshall
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 06:46:28 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 16:57:13 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
paul c
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 14:34:52 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 14:46:28 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Marshall
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 09:02:42 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Jon Heggland
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 09:23:44 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Brian Selzer
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 10:36:49 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Brian Selzer
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 15:18:40 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
paul c
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 15:57:51 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Marshall
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 16:36:19 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
paul c
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 23:47:17 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Brian Selzer
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 17:47:44 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Brian Selzer
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 20:50:33 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Brian Selzer
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 21:29:37 CEST)
Re: Designing a database system for multiple autonomous clients.
Thomas Gagne
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 05:00:46 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Brian Selzer
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 08:05:45 CEST)
Re: Many To Many Relationships
David Cressey
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 12:28:39 CEST)
Re: Many To Many Relationships
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 14:02:05 CEST)
Re: Many To Many Relationships
mAsterdam
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 00:46:34 CEST)
Re: Many To Many Relationships
mAsterdam
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 00:43:28 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 (repost)
Mike Preece
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 13:17:58 CEST)
[MultiValue] Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 (repost)
dawn
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 04:23:24 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 (repost)
Mike Preece
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 11:40:46 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 (repost)
dawn
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 21:04:58 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [MV]
mAsterdam
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 01:12:58 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [MV]
Mike Preece
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 14:18:41 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [MV]
dawn
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 16:09:07 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [MV]
paul c
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 01:22:26 CEST)
Re: Many To Many Relationships
Brian Selzer
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 14:18:44 CEST)
Re: Many To Many Relationships
Tonkuma
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 17:58:36 CEST)
Re: MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Brian Selzer
(Tue Apr 17 2007 - 19:06:38 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 (repost)
Brian Selzer
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 04:42:14 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 (repost)
paul c
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 05:40:43 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
mAsterdam
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 01:29:02 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
paul c
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 01:55:15 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
paul c
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 02:04:47 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
mAsterdam
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 19:38:41 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
paul c
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 00:33:01 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
mAsterdam
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 01:40:05 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 (repost)
Brian Selzer
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 14:21:00 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
David Cressey
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 18:38:36 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Bob Badour
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 18:45:38 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
jonnie
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 18:47:41 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Bob Badour
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 21:11:25 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Brian Selzer
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 19:36:14 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Brian Selzer
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 20:14:05 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 (repost)
paul c
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 02:29:11 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 (repost)
Bob Badour
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 02:32:12 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 (repost)
paul c
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 02:49:37 CEST)
Re: Signing relational databases
Marshall
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 04:20:23 CEST)
Re: Definition of reference - was Continuation - An attempt at retriggering thought about past subjects
Jonathan Leffler
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 06:17:46 CEST)
Re: Definition of reference - was Continuation - An attempt at retriggering thought about past subjects
mAsterdam
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 19:52:05 CEST)
Re: Definition of reference - was Continuation - An attempt at retriggering thought about past subjects
Bruce C. Baker
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 06:44:36 CEST)
Re: Definition of reference - was Continuation - An attempt at retriggering thought about past subjects
mAsterdam
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 19:55:23 CEST)
Re: Definition of reference - was Continuation - An attempt at retriggering thought about past subjects
Bruce C. Baker
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 20:40:29 CEST)
Re: Definition of reference - was Continuation - An attempt at retriggering thought about past subjects
paul c
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 01:04:09 CEST)
Re: Definition of reference - was Continuation - An attempt at retriggering thought about past subjects
Bob Badour
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 01:54:53 CEST)
Re: Definition of reference - was Continuation - An attempt at retriggering thought about past subjects
paul c
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 03:17:03 CEST)
Re: Definition of reference - was Continuation - An attempt at retriggering thought about past subjects
paul c
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 03:18:59 CEST)
Re: Definition of reference - was Continuation - An attempt at retriggering thought about past subjects
Jonathan Leffler
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 06:39:07 CEST)
Re: Definition of reference - was Continuation - An attempt at retriggering thought about past subjects
Bob Badour
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 06:41:48 CEST)
Re: Definition of reference - was Continuation - An attempt at retriggering thought about past subjects
paul c
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 15:38:54 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 (repost)
Brian Selzer
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 07:27:05 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 (repost)
Gene Wirchenko
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 07:41:10 CEST)
Re: Signing relational databases
Julien Lafaye
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 09:03:25 CEST)
Re: Signing relational databases
Marshall
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 16:03:10 CEST)
Re: Signing relational databases
Jonathan Leffler
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 06:27:40 CEST)
Re: Signing relational databases
David BL
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 09:38:03 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 (repost)
Brian Selzer
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 09:54:22 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 (repost)
Brian Selzer
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 10:08:22 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 (repost)
Brian Selzer
(Thu Apr 19 2007 - 15:13:07 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
Brian Selzer
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 05:42:48 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
paul c
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 15:22:07 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
Bob Badour
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 15:44:20 CEST)
Re: Signing relational databases
mountain man
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 08:53:57 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
Brian Selzer
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 16:01:23 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
Brian Selzer
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 16:38:12 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
paul c
(Sat Apr 21 2007 - 00:51:54 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
paul c
(Sat Apr 21 2007 - 02:29:26 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
Bob Badour
(Sat Apr 21 2007 - 02:57:34 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
paul c
(Sat Apr 21 2007 - 04:14:24 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
Bob Badour
(Sat Apr 21 2007 - 04:32:54 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
David BL
(Sat Apr 21 2007 - 04:41:49 CEST)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
jefftyzzer
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 20:07:02 CEST)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 22:47:54 CEST)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
Bob Badour
(Fri Apr 20 2007 - 23:17:30 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
Brian Selzer
(Sat Apr 21 2007 - 06:52:39 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
David Cressey
(Sat Apr 21 2007 - 12:38:57 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 [Transaction]
Brian Selzer
(Sat Apr 21 2007 - 16:25:47 CEST)
Re: predicate, constraints, header, relvar, and relation
Bob Badour
(Sun Apr 22 2007 - 00:23:51 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Brian Selzer
(Sun Apr 22 2007 - 15:24:47 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Sun Apr 22 2007 - 22:00:30 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Brian Selzer
(Mon Apr 23 2007 - 04:38:18 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
paul c
(Mon Apr 23 2007 - 23:43:44 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
jefftyzzer
(Wed Apr 25 2007 - 02:23:35 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
mAsterdam
(Wed Apr 25 2007 - 03:26:52 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
mAsterdam
(Wed Apr 25 2007 - 03:09:02 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
paul c
(Wed Apr 25 2007 - 15:46:38 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
mAsterdam
(Wed Apr 25 2007 - 17:05:55 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
paul c
(Wed Apr 25 2007 - 23:20:04 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
paul c
(Wed Apr 25 2007 - 23:50:31 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
David BL
(Wed Apr 25 2007 - 03:39:34 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
Marshall
(Thu Apr 26 2007 - 04:25:47 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
Bob Badour
(Thu Apr 26 2007 - 13:16:22 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
David BL
(Thu Apr 26 2007 - 14:40:08 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Brian Selzer
(Wed Apr 25 2007 - 14:13:23 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
jefftyzzer
(Wed Apr 25 2007 - 17:37:00 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
Gints Plivna
(Wed Apr 25 2007 - 21:36:00 CEST)
Re: temporal data constraint
Brian Selzer
(Thu Apr 26 2007 - 01:14:32 CEST)
Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
V.J. Kumar
(Thu Apr 26 2007 - 03:08:35 CEST)
Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
paul c
(Thu Apr 26 2007 - 15:23:35 CEST)
Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu Apr 26 2007 - 19:08:04 CEST)
Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
paul c
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 01:16:47 CEST)
Re: temporal data constraint
Jon Heggland
(Thu Apr 26 2007 - 08:53:31 CEST)
Re: temporal data constraints
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu Apr 26 2007 - 19:37:30 CEST)
Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
jefftyzzer
(Thu Apr 26 2007 - 20:55:45 CEST)
Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
V.J. Kumar
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 00:22:45 CEST)
Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
Vadim Tropashko
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 02:54:50 CEST)
Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
Vadim Tropashko
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 03:15:30 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 01:23:53 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 01:24:27 CEST)
Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
V.J. Kumar
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 02:19:16 CEST)
Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
paul c
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 02:22:20 CEST)
Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
V.J. Kumar
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 02:45:49 CEST)
Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
paul c
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 03:34:41 CEST)
Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
V.J. Kumar
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 03:45:06 CEST)
Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
Vadim Tropashko
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 18:38:57 CEST)
Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
V.J. Kumar
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 05:12:14 CEST)
Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
paul c
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 14:06:31 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Brian Selzer
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 06:24:57 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 14:00:51 CEST)
Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
V.J. Kumar
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 21:33:51 CEST)
Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
Vadim Tropashko
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 22:28:26 CEST)
Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
V.J. Kumar
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 22:48:48 CEST)
Re: Theoretical definition for the number of unique values?
Lemming
(Sat Apr 28 2007 - 02:21:12 CEST)
Re: Theoretical definition for the number of unique values?
hpuxrac
(Sat Apr 28 2007 - 02:52:00 CEST)
Re: Theoretical definition for the number of unique values?
Lemming
(Sat Apr 28 2007 - 03:01:23 CEST)
Re: Theoretical definition for the number of unique values?
hpuxrac
(Sat Apr 28 2007 - 20:07:34 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
-CELKO-
(Sat Apr 28 2007 - 15:31:18 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
David Cressey
(Sat Apr 28 2007 - 15:56:36 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Bob Badour
(Sat Apr 28 2007 - 16:20:17 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
-CELKO-
(Sun Apr 29 2007 - 14:41:17 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Brian Selzer
(Sat Apr 28 2007 - 17:55:23 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
David Cressey
(Sun Apr 29 2007 - 15:00:37 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 04:18:42 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
paul c
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 05:16:46 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 07:58:09 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 09:58:30 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 07:52:40 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 08:07:49 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 08:15:51 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 10:19:04 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 10:47:27 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 13:09:41 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 13:12:05 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 13:42:49 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 14:00:38 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 14:26:12 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 14:40:06 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 14:56:47 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 15:13:10 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 15:21:47 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 15:30:06 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 15:33:56 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 17:52:37 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 18:08:15 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 18:43:52 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Mon Apr 30 2007 - 18:49:34 CEST)
Re: OT: SICP Footnote
Gene Wirchenko
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 07:48:26 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Bruce C. Baker
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 08:01:22 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 10:52:00 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Gene Wirchenko
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 08:04:11 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Bob Badour
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 16:28:35 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 18:07:07 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Bob Badour
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 19:04:40 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
paul c
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 16:37:53 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 18:23:20 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
paul c
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 22:49:54 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Cimode
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 16:40:12 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 17:28:33 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Bob Badour
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 16:48:28 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 18:34:28 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Bob Badour
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 19:30:12 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Bruce C. Baker
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 17:02:46 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
Marshall
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 18:37:25 CEST)
Re: choice of character for relational division
David Cressey
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 23:35:34 CEST)
data mining
binayaj_at_gmail.com
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 13:37:43 CEST)
Re: Problems w/ SQL Insert with a static parm
littldo_at_yahoo.com
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 16:35:58 CEST)
Infix operator names
David Cressey
(Sun Apr 01 2007 - 23:30:13 CEST)
Database Design Patterns?
aj
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 22:01:18 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 22:15:11 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
aj
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 22:23:48 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
aj
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 22:25:13 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 22:42:05 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
Vadim Tropashko
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 22:28:37 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 23:05:40 CEST)
Re: Database Design Patterns?
Doug Morse
(Mon Apr 02 2007 - 23:10:24 CEST)
Database design of stock prices?
knguyen
(Wed Apr 04 2007 - 05:56:15 CEST)
SQL Joins question
jeff.lawrence_at_gmail.com
(Wed Apr 04 2007 - 23:26:15 CEST)
MERGE as the imperative form of aggregation
Marshall
(Sat Apr 07 2007 - 21:46:24 CEST)
Where is everybody?
Marshall
(Mon Apr 09 2007 - 20:16:33 CEST)
Re: Where is everybody?
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 09 2007 - 21:31:56 CEST)
Table acting as a relation table
Guy
(Tue Apr 10 2007 - 21:41:06 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
Lennart
(Tue Apr 10 2007 - 22:53:58 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
Guy
(Tue Apr 10 2007 - 23:07:12 CEST)
Re: Table acting as a relation table
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 10 2007 - 23:35:02 CEST)
Entity Relationship Diagrams
Gregc.
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 11:33:59 CEST)
Re: Entity Relationship Diagrams
Roy Hann
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 11:45:50 CEST)
Re: Entity Relationship Diagrams
David Cressey
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 13:16:09 CEST)
Re: Entity Relationship Diagrams
Bob Badour
(Wed Apr 11 2007 - 15:06:30 CEST)
Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
beachmountain_at_hotmail.com
(Thu Apr 12 2007 - 15:44:48 CEST)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
Bob Badour
(Thu Apr 12 2007 - 16:48:16 CEST)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
Cimode
(Thu Apr 12 2007 - 17:22:06 CEST)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Thu Apr 12 2007 - 18:06:25 CEST)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
Volker Hetzer
(Thu Apr 12 2007 - 18:25:23 CEST)
Theoretical definition for the number of unique values?
sqlservernewbie_at_yahoo.com
(Thu Apr 12 2007 - 17:19:36 CEST)
Re: Theoretical definition for the number of unique values?
Bob Badour
(Thu Apr 12 2007 - 17:45:26 CEST)
Re: Theoretical definition for the number of unique values?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Thu Apr 12 2007 - 19:56:41 CEST)
Re: Theoretical definition for the number of unique values?
Mark D Powell
(Thu Apr 12 2007 - 20:09:43 CEST)
Re: Theoretical definition for the number of unique values?
fitzjarrell_at_cox.net
(Thu Apr 12 2007 - 20:10:09 CEST)
cdt glossary 0.1.1 (repost)
mAsterdam
(Sat Apr 14 2007 - 12:37:16 CEST)
delete cascade
paul c
(Sun Apr 15 2007 - 05:46:47 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Bob Badour
(Sun Apr 15 2007 - 06:08:05 CEST)
Re: delete cascade
Brian Selzer
(Sun Apr 15 2007 - 13:41:21 CEST)
Many To Many Relationships
Loon
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 12:54:42 CEST)
Re: Many To Many Relationships
Cimode
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 14:36:33 CEST)
Re: Many To Many Relationships
Tonkuma
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 14:40:11 CEST)
Re: Many To Many Relationships
David Cressey
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 15:47:48 CEST)
Re: Many To Many Relationships
Marshall
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 16:22:50 CEST)
Re: Many To Many Relationships
David Cressey
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 22:20:10 CEST)
Re: Many To Many Relationships
Marshall
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 22:45:30 CEST)
Re: A database theory resource - ideas
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 19:30:02 CEST)
Re: A database theory resource - ideas
Bob Badour
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 19:31:20 CEST)
Designing a database system for multiple autonomous clients.
anthony.galano_at_gmail.com
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 21:54:39 CEST)
Re: Designing a database system for multiple autonomous clients.
Marshall
(Mon Apr 16 2007 - 22:42:58 CEST)
Signing relational databases
Julien Lafaye
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 16:03:53 CEST)
WWW/Internet 2007: Call for Papers (Vila Real, Portugal)
natty2006_at_gmail.com
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 19:13:28 CEST)
Continuation - An attempt at retriggering thought about past subjects
Cimode
(Wed Apr 18 2007 - 21:02:15 CEST)
predicate, constraints, header, relvar, and relation
davis.jeffrey_at_gmail.com
(Sat Apr 21 2007 - 01:15:33 CEST)
Re: predicate, constraints, header, relvar, and relation
Bob Badour
(Sat Apr 21 2007 - 02:26:01 CEST)
Re: predicate, constraints, header, relvar, and relation
Marshall
(Sat Apr 21 2007 - 03:07:39 CEST)
Re: predicate, constraints, header, relvar, and relation
Bob Badour
(Sat Apr 21 2007 - 03:50:28 CEST)
Re: predicate, constraints, header, relvar, and relation
Marshall
(Sat Apr 21 2007 - 07:42:13 CEST)
Re: predicate, constraints, header, relvar, and relation
David BL
(Sat Apr 21 2007 - 06:20:40 CEST)
Re: predicate, constraints, header, relvar, and relation
davis.jeffrey_at_gmail.com
(Sat Apr 21 2007 - 21:31:21 CEST)
Naming Conventions?
Karen Hill
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 00:05:39 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 00:15:43 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
Karen Hill
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 00:22:53 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 00:30:30 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
paul c
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 00:53:42 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
paul c
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 02:49:00 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 03:10:30 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
paul c
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 03:16:46 CEST)
Simonyi was in space - back already (Was: Naming Conventions?)
Jonathan Leffler
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 06:26:37 CEST)
Re: Simonyi was in space - back already (Was: Naming Conventions?)
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 07:04:21 CEST)
Re: Simonyi was in space - back already (Was: Naming Conventions?)
Marshall
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 09:37:47 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
Andy Dingley
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 13:21:16 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
Alfredo Novoa
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 14:27:55 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
paul c
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 00:35:21 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
Bob Badour
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 01:05:42 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
Marshall
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 06:17:14 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
Gints Plivna
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 22:39:47 CEST)
Re: Naming Conventions?
jefftyzzer
(Tue Apr 24 2007 - 23:03:38 CEST)
temporal data constraint
davis.jeffrey_at_gmail.com
(Wed Apr 25 2007 - 19:50:23 CEST)
temporal data constraints
davis.jeffrey_at_gmail.com
(Wed Apr 25 2007 - 23:05:42 CEST)
Why relational division is so uncommon?
Vadim Tropashko
(Wed Apr 25 2007 - 20:16:44 CEST)
Newbie question on table design.
somedeveloper_at_gmail.com
(Thu Apr 26 2007 - 07:48:41 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Bob Badour
(Thu Apr 26 2007 - 13:23:31 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Brian Selzer
(Thu Apr 26 2007 - 14:34:47 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Cimode
(Thu Apr 26 2007 - 16:09:01 CEST)
newsgroup for asking general SQL questions?
Jason S
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 16:19:07 CEST)
Re: newsgroup for asking general SQL questions?
Bob Badour
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 16:41:32 CEST)
Re: newsgroup for asking general SQL questions?
Jason S
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 18:00:10 CEST)
Re: newsgroup for asking general SQL questions?
Bob Badour
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 20:00:06 CEST)
Re: newsgroup for asking general SQL questions?
Ed Prochak
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 20:29:02 CEST)
Re: newsgroup for asking general SQL questions?
Bob Badour
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 20:36:47 CEST)
Re: newsgroup for asking general SQL questions?
Vadim Tropashko
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 18:59:09 CEST)
Re: newsgroup for asking general SQL questions?
Thomas Gagne
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 19:56:19 CEST)
Unrepeatable Read: why a problem
Ravi
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 17:18:31 CEST)
Re: Unrepeatable Read: why a problem
V.J. Kumar
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 17:53:36 CEST)
Re: Unrepeatable Read: why a problem
Ravi
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 20:19:32 CEST)
Re: Unrepeatable Read: why a problem
Bob Badour
(Fri Apr 27 2007 - 20:04:30 CEST)
A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Sun Apr 29 2007 - 12:04:03 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Sun Apr 29 2007 - 16:21:27 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Sun Apr 29 2007 - 18:13:06 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
paul c
(Sun Apr 29 2007 - 17:48:44 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Sun Apr 29 2007 - 18:23:33 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Sun Apr 29 2007 - 19:22:09 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Tonkuma
(Sun Apr 29 2007 - 20:24:00 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Sun Apr 29 2007 - 20:44:56 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Sun Apr 29 2007 - 20:33:50 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Sun Apr 29 2007 - 21:07:08 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Sun Apr 29 2007 - 21:29:39 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Sun Apr 29 2007 - 21:35:55 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Sun Apr 29 2007 - 23:01:39 CEST)
Oracle 9i Database Administration in 10 Minutes
takveen_at_gmail.com
(Sun Apr 29 2007 - 14:10:36 CEST)
Last message date
:
Mon Apr 30 2007 - 18:49:34 CEST
Archived on
: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 21:51:56 CEST
474 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
.::
Blogger Home
::
Wiki Home
::
Forum Home
::
Privacy
::
Contact
::.