Re: choice of character for relational division
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 23:02:07 GMT
Message-ID: <PRWPh.18232$PV3.188947_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
> All the good nonalphabetic symbols used to represent functions
> typically via infix notation but sometimes for prefix or suffix
> have been previously owned?
>
>
> Marshall
>
> PS. But are protected by our extended warranty?
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 23:02:07 GMT
Message-ID: <PRWPh.18232$PV3.188947_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Marshall wrote:
> On Apr 1, 3:00 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>>David Cressey wrote: >> >>>>... all the good operators have been taken! >> >>>I'm just picking up on this now. Did the author mean "all the good symbols >>>have been taken" instead of "all the good operators have been taken"? >> >>Operators are symbols by definition. He didn't say that all the good >>operations have been taken.
>
> All the good nonalphabetic symbols used to represent functions
> typically via infix notation but sometimes for prefix or suffix
> have been previously owned?
>
>
> Marshall
>
> PS. But are protected by our extended warranty?
Don't forget the "fully reconditioned" part! Received on Mon Apr 02 2007 - 01:02:07 CEST