Re: Table acting as a relation table
From: Lennart <erik.lennart.jonsson_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:09:07 +0200
Message-ID: <evjboj$val$1_at_registered.motzarella.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:09:07 +0200
Message-ID: <evjboj$val$1_at_registered.motzarella.org>
Lennart wrote:
[...]
> No no, you should definitely have a primary key, but why not CLINIC_CODE
> as suggested in this thread?
In have no idea why half the message where posted twice, sorry
/Lennart Received on Wed Apr 11 2007 - 21:09:07 CEST