Re: Table acting as a relation table

From: Guy <guhar1_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 11 Apr 2007 13:45:33 -0700
Message-ID: <1176324333.763684.63950_at_d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>


> No no, you should definitely have a primary key, but why not CLINIC_CODE
> as suggested in this thread?

I think it would indeed be better since a clinic can only participate in only one relation with an hospital. Received on Wed Apr 11 2007 - 22:45:33 CEST

Original text of this message