Re: Why relational division is so uncommon?
From: V.J. Kumar <vjkmail_at_gmail.com>
Date: 27 Apr 2007 05:12:14 +0200
Message-ID: <Xns991EEC0C6949Evdghher_at_217.22.228.20>
>
> If Invoice had no "paid" attribute, I presume there would be a
> Payments relation.
>
Date: 27 Apr 2007 05:12:14 +0200
Message-ID: <Xns991EEC0C6949Evdghher_at_217.22.228.20>
>> Then there is no way to determine whether or not it was paid and your >> question cannot be answered in principle ! Of course, you can use >> some other attribute name to reflect the invoice status, like >> 'status' for example. >> >> vj >> >>
>
> If Invoice had no "paid" attribute, I presume there would be a
> Payments relation.
>
> p
>
Received on Fri Apr 27 2007 - 05:12:14 CEST