Re: Naming Conventions?
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:16:22 GMT
Message-ID: <aS%Xh.28113$PV3.296210_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
> Not at all!
>
>
>
> Well, my point was not to use "-Info" as a suffix; it appears you
> agree, yes?
>
> I would be interested to hear what you consider to be the distinction
> between state and data.
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:16:22 GMT
Message-ID: <aS%Xh.28113$PV3.296210_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Marshall wrote:
> On Apr 24, 6:39 pm, David BL <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote:
>
>>On Apr 24, 12:17 pm, Marshall <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>Also bad: using the "-info" suffix. *Everything* in the computer is >>>info! >> >>You have a very liberal usage of "info".
>
> Not at all!
>
>
>>I would say, for example, >>that a thread pool has state but I wouldn't call it info (or data).
>
> Well, my point was not to use "-Info" as a suffix; it appears you
> agree, yes?
>
> I would be interested to hear what you consider to be the distinction
> between state and data.
It would be very entertaining to hear exactly how information about the threads differs from the state of the thread pool. Received on Thu Apr 26 2007 - 13:16:22 CEST