Re: delete cascade
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:14:17 GMT
Message-ID: <Jk9Xh.118597$DE1.45975_at_pd7urf2no>
>
>
> I mention it because it would fully disclose the data to be deleted,
> which is the invoice and the associated items.
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:14:17 GMT
Message-ID: <Jk9Xh.118597$DE1.45975_at_pd7urf2no>
Bob Badour wrote:
> paul c wrote:
>
>> Bob Badour wrote: >> ... >> >>> Would it suffice to declare the view using the RVA as above and then >>> project away the RVA? >> >> >> I'm guessing that you mention rva's so that there can be no chance >> that a product would be permitted to only partially complete the >> operation, and leave some items dangling, whereas some products might >> allow a series of delete statements to be interrupted?
>
>
> I mention it because it would fully disclose the data to be deleted,
> which is the invoice and the associated items.
p Received on Mon Apr 23 2007 - 23:14:17 CEST