Re: Naming Conventions?
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:09:02 +0200
Message-ID: <462ea98b$0$330$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:09:02 +0200
Message-ID: <462ea98b$0$330$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Karen Hill wrote:
> What do you believe is the best naming convention for tables, columns,
> schemas and why?
Sadly, names do not matter to much to structuralists like paulc and BB
(I'm sure paulc won't mind :-).
The only sensible advice up to now is "make sense".
It will take some time until naming, as such, will be a topic
considered worth discussing outside semiological elites.
BTW IMHO "conventions" are NOT the way to go.
Study ORM (as in Object Role Modeling, NOT Object relational mapping). Received on Wed Apr 25 2007 - 03:09:02 CEST