Re: choice of character for relational division
Date: 31 Mar 2007 21:24:50 -0700
Message-ID: <1175401490.066018.307570_at_l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
On Mar 31, 8:44 am, "Marshall" <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Let us consider the choice of characters to use for
> relational operators.
Dagnabbit! How come when I want to talk about something, we talk about everything *except* that? I tried to start a thread about possreps, and the whole thread became me defending a rational type. I want to ask about picking a character for a well-known operation, and now I'm supposed to defend the operation?
Phooey!
Folks want to talk about whether the world needs relational division, they can start their own thread, in which I will talk about the relative merits of the Bangles vs. the Go Gos.
Bemused and slightly frustrated,
Marshall
PS. Walk like an Egyptian. Received on Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:24:50 CEST