comp.databases.theory: by thread

citations of nature mountain man (Thu Jan 01 2004 - 06:26:11 CST)
- Re: citations of nature Paul G. Brown (Thu Jan 01 2004 - 14:28:06 CST)
  - Re: citations of nature mountain man (Fri Jan 02 2004 - 07:43:42 CST)
- Re: citations of nature David Portas (Thu Jan 01 2004 - 18:21:34 CST)
  - Re: citations of nature mountain man (Fri Jan 02 2004 - 07:43:43 CST)
- Re: citations of nature Dawn M. Wolthuis (Sat Jan 03 2004 - 00:37:05 CST)
  - Re: citations of nature mountain man (Sat Jan 03 2004 - 17:52:03 CST)
    - Re: citations of nature Dawn M. Wolthuis (Sat Jan 03 2004 - 18:36:55 CST)
      - Re: citations of nature Marshall Spight (Sun Jan 04 2004 - 00:46:50 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature Bob Badour (Sun Jan 04 2004 - 05:01:34 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature mountain man (Sun Jan 04 2004 - 19:32:22 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature Dawn M. Wolthuis (Sun Jan 04 2004 - 20:04:06 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature Anith Sen (Sun Jan 04 2004 - 23:17:46 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature Dawn M. Wolthuis (Mon Jan 05 2004 - 00:09:55 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature mountain man (Mon Jan 05 2004 - 09:19:51 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature Anith Sen (Mon Jan 05 2004 - 21:47:43 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature Dawn M. Wolthuis (Mon Jan 05 2004 - 22:31:56 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature Anith Sen (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 23:30:02 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Jan 07 2004 - 09:42:39 CST)
        Re: citations of nature Bob Badour (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 02:15:14 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature mountain man (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 18:47:37 CST)
        Re: citations of nature Bob Badour (Mon Jan 05 2004 - 02:48:54 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature Anith Sen (Mon Jan 05 2004 - 19:49:50 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature mountain man (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 05:44:01 CST)
        Re: citations of nature mountain man (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 02:36:14 CST)
      - Re: citations of nature mountain man (Sun Jan 04 2004 - 05:58:45 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature Dawn M. Wolthuis (Sun Jan 04 2004 - 06:58:58 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature Adrian Kubala (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 15:35:18 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature mountain man (Wed Jan 07 2004 - 08:50:55 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature Bob Badour (Wed Jan 07 2004 - 21:54:00 CST)
- Re: citations of nature Adrian Kubala (Sat Jan 03 2004 - 13:22:42 CST)
  - Re: citations of nature mountain man (Sun Jan 04 2004 - 21:12:52 CST)
    - Re: citations of nature Adrian Kubala (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 15:24:49 CST)
      - Re: citations of nature Bob Badour (Wed Jan 07 2004 - 21:53:04 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Jan 07 2004 - 22:32:50 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature Adrian Kubala (Thu Jan 08 2004 - 19:40:37 CST)
        
        Re: citations of nature Bob Badour (Thu Jan 08 2004 - 23:43:32 CST)
Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS David Portas (Thu Jan 01 2004 - 15:48:24 CST)
- Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS Joe \ (Thu Jan 01 2004 - 15:55:32 CST)
  - Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS abombss (Thu Jan 01 2004 - 16:22:40 CST)
    - Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS David Portas (Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:21:02 CST)
      - Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS abombss (Thu Jan 01 2004 - 23:57:41 CST)
        
        Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS Adrian Kubala (Fri Jan 09 2004 - 13:17:56 CST)
- Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS abombss (Thu Jan 01 2004 - 16:06:32 CST)
  - Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS David Portas (Thu Jan 01 2004 - 16:14:11 CST)
    - Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS abombss (Thu Jan 01 2004 - 16:37:22 CST)
- Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS Lennart Jonsson (Wed Jan 07 2004 - 02:38:48 CST)
- Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS Troels Arvin (Wed Jan 07 2004 - 03:38:40 CST)
  - Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS David Portas (Thu Jan 08 2004 - 05:06:09 CST)
Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Thu Jan 01 2004 - 15:58:05 CST)
- Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Thu Jan 01 2004 - 18:53:01 CST)
  - Re: relations aren't types? Alfredo Novoa (Fri Jan 02 2004 - 05:05:36 CST)
    - Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Fri Jan 02 2004 - 09:12:49 CST)
      - Re: relations aren't types? Alfredo Novoa (Fri Jan 02 2004 - 18:05:52 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Mikito Harakiri (Fri Jan 02 2004 - 18:39:39 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Alfredo Novoa (Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:04:32 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Mikito Harakiri (Sat Jan 03 2004 - 12:59:33 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Sat Jan 03 2004 - 13:38:41 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Alfredo Novoa (Sat Jan 03 2004 - 17:17:10 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Sat Jan 03 2004 - 01:18:32 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Alfredo Novoa (Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:15:41 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Sat Jan 03 2004 - 10:39:08 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Alfredo Novoa (Sat Jan 03 2004 - 17:00:51 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Sat Jan 03 2004 - 22:12:00 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Alfredo Novoa (Sun Jan 04 2004 - 13:27:22 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Sun Jan 04 2004 - 15:44:17 CST)
  - Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Fri Jan 02 2004 - 23:01:08 CST)
    - Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Sat Jan 03 2004 - 01:21:38 CST)
      - Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Mon Jan 05 2004 - 11:54:28 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Mon Jan 05 2004 - 14:57:59 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Mon Jan 05 2004 - 21:13:30 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 02:02:27 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 12:34:58 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Wed Jan 07 2004 - 21:47:37 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Thu Jan 08 2004 - 10:41:43 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Thu Jan 08 2004 - 14:23:46 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Thu Jan 08 2004 - 22:14:54 CST)
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Thu Jan 08 2004 - 20:11:04 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Thu Jan 08 2004 - 23:42:02 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Fri Jan 09 2004 - 13:35:48 CST)
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Fri Jan 09 2004 - 10:47:34 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Fri Jan 09 2004 - 12:46:47 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Fri Jan 09 2004 - 23:41:52 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Sat Jan 10 2004 - 13:50:10 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Sat Jan 10 2004 - 23:27:08 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Alfredo Novoa (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 06:38:36 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 12:51:27 CST)
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Sat Jan 10 2004 - 17:25:57 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 01:38:07 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 17:18:52 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Joe \ (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 19:30:19 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 00:14:39 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 01:39:08 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 11:05:22 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 16:04:04 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 23:00:58 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 00:32:57 CST)
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 16:03:32 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 16:45:20 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 17:27:09 CST)
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 23:51:49 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 01:05:42 CST)
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 16:47:56 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 00:13:10 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 01:47:38 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 00:11:20 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 02:17:56 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 21:43:47 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Joe \ (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 22:47:25 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 00:44:02 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Costin Cozianu (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 15:52:45 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 22:04:39 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 22:11:18 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 23:18:05 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 23:21:30 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Fri Jan 16 2004 - 01:32:41 CST)
Re: how to impliment " bit string type + 1 " by SQL ? Jonathan Leffler (Thu Jan 01 2004 - 19:02:41 CST)