Home
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
9 messages
:
Starting
Thu Jan 01 2004 - 13:26:11 CET,
Ending
Thu Jan 01 2004 - 23:37:22 CET
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
citations of nature
mountain man
(Thu Jan 01 2004 - 13:26:11 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Paul G. Brown
(Thu Jan 01 2004 - 21:28:06 CET)
Re: citations of nature
David Portas
(Fri Jan 02 2004 - 01:21:34 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 07:37:05 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Adrian Kubala
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 20:22:42 CET)
Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS
David Portas
(Fri Jan 02 2004 - 00:21:02 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Fri Jan 02 2004 - 01:53:01 CET)
Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS
abombss
(Fri Jan 02 2004 - 06:57:41 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Alfredo Novoa
(Fri Jan 02 2004 - 12:05:36 CET)
Re: citations of nature
mountain man
(Fri Jan 02 2004 - 14:43:42 CET)
Re: citations of nature
mountain man
(Fri Jan 02 2004 - 14:43:43 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Fri Jan 02 2004 - 16:12:49 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Alfredo Novoa
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 01:05:52 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Mikito Harakiri
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 01:39:39 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 06:01:08 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:18:32 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:21:38 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
Mike MacSween
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 09:25:31 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
Fletcher Arnold
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 13:27:29 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
Mike MacSween
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 13:50:54 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Alfredo Novoa
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 15:04:32 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Alfredo Novoa
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 15:15:41 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
Roger
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 16:34:30 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
--CELKO--
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 17:06:38 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 17:39:08 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
Mike MacSween
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 17:40:49 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Mikito Harakiri
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 19:59:33 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 20:38:41 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
Mike MacSween
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 22:24:42 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
Roger
(Sat Jan 03 2004 - 23:27:11 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Alfredo Novoa
(Sun Jan 04 2004 - 00:00:51 CET)
Re: Scalars & atomic values & variables
Joe \
(Sun Jan 04 2004 - 00:06:53 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Alfredo Novoa
(Sun Jan 04 2004 - 00:17:10 CET)
Re: citations of nature
mountain man
(Sun Jan 04 2004 - 00:52:03 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sun Jan 04 2004 - 01:36:55 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Sun Jan 04 2004 - 05:12:00 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Marshall Spight
(Sun Jan 04 2004 - 07:46:50 CET)
Re: Domain
Peter Koch Larsen
(Sun Jan 04 2004 - 11:39:05 CET)
Re: Domain
Bob Badour
(Sun Jan 04 2004 - 11:59:54 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Bob Badour
(Sun Jan 04 2004 - 12:01:34 CET)
Re: citations of nature
mountain man
(Sun Jan 04 2004 - 12:58:45 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sun Jan 04 2004 - 13:58:58 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
--CELKO--
(Sun Jan 04 2004 - 20:03:33 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Alfredo Novoa
(Sun Jan 04 2004 - 20:27:22 CET)
Re: Nested sets, BOM, with many roots?
Paul
(Sun Jan 04 2004 - 21:12:37 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Sun Jan 04 2004 - 22:44:17 CET)
Re: Nested sets, BOM, with many roots?
Troels Arvin
(Sun Jan 04 2004 - 22:47:22 CET)
Re: citations of nature
mountain man
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 02:32:22 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 03:04:06 CET)
Re: Hierachical structures - an overview
Lee Fesperman
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 03:19:33 CET)
Re: citations of nature
mountain man
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 04:12:52 CET)
Re: Hierachical structures - an overview
Lennart Jonsson
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 05:06:44 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Anith Sen
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 06:17:46 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 07:09:55 CET)
Re: Scalars & atomic values & variables
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 07:32:23 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Bob Badour
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 09:48:54 CET)
Re: Scalars & atomic values & variables
Bob Badour
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 09:51:45 CET)
Re: Scalars & atomic values & variables
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 14:45:09 CET)
Re: Hierachical structures - an overview
Lennart Jonsson
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 10:01:16 CET)
Re: Domain
Peter Koch Larsen
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 12:29:55 CET)
Re: Functional dependencies
shannon
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 15:48:21 CET)
Re: citations of nature
mountain man
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 16:19:51 CET)
Re: Hierachical structures - an overview
Marshall Spight
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 18:09:08 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 18:54:28 CET)
Re: Hierachical structures - an overview
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 19:04:22 CET)
Re: Hierachical structures - an overview
Mark Johnson
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 20:46:19 CET)
Re: Domain
Bob Badour
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 21:44:32 CET)
Re: Functional dependencies
Bob Badour
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 21:45:23 CET)
Re: Functional dependencies
shannon
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 23:33:14 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 21:57:59 CET)
Re: Scalars & atomic values & variables
Bob Badour
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 21:59:46 CET)
Re: Scalars & atomic values & variables
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 22:11:35 CET)
Re: Scalars & atomic values & variables
Bob Badour
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 23:24:30 CET)
Re: Scalars & atomic values & variables
Lauri Pietarinen
(Mon Jan 05 2004 - 23:31:17 CET)
Re: Scalars & atomic values & variables
Lauri Pietarinen
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 01:08:27 CET)
Re: Nested sets, BOM, with many roots?
Paul
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 00:12:44 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
Mike Sherrill
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 00:45:54 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
Mike MacSween
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 01:19:46 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 01:50:41 CET)
Re: Two-valued logic
--CELKO--
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 02:27:40 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Anith Sen
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 02:49:50 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 04:13:30 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Anith Sen
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 04:47:43 CET)
Re: Hierachical structures - an overview
Marshall Spight
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 05:28:08 CET)
Re: mysql - How much disk space is used by indexes?
Marshall Spight
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 05:30:17 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 05:31:56 CET)
Re: Hierachical structures - an overview
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 05:47:57 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 09:02:27 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Bob Badour
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 09:15:14 CET)
Re: citations of nature
mountain man
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 09:36:14 CET)
Re: mysql - How much disk space is used by indexes?
mountain man
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 09:36:14 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
Roger
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 12:06:31 CET)
Re: citations of nature
mountain man
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 12:44:01 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
Roger
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 13:45:47 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 18:39:30 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 19:34:58 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Adrian Kubala
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 22:24:49 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Adrian Kubala
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 22:35:18 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
Roger
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 23:05:45 CET)
Re: Domain
Adrian Kubala
(Tue Jan 06 2004 - 22:42:58 CET)
Re: citations of nature
mountain man
(Wed Jan 07 2004 - 01:47:37 CET)
Re: B+ tree implementation
Daisy Han
(Wed Jan 07 2004 - 01:48:09 CET)
Re: Two-valued logic
Joe \
(Wed Jan 07 2004 - 03:21:30 CET)
Re: Two-valued logic
Christopher Browne
(Wed Jan 07 2004 - 05:21:46 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Anith Sen
(Wed Jan 07 2004 - 06:30:02 CET)
Re: equivalence of functional dependencies
Jonathan Leffler
(Wed Jan 07 2004 - 07:21:22 CET)
Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS
Lennart Jonsson
(Wed Jan 07 2004 - 09:38:48 CET)
Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS
Troels Arvin
(Wed Jan 07 2004 - 10:38:40 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
Mike Sherrill
(Wed Jan 07 2004 - 12:41:08 CET)
Re: equivalence of functional dependencies
Mark Johnson
(Wed Jan 07 2004 - 13:34:34 CET)
Re: citations of nature
mountain man
(Wed Jan 07 2004 - 15:50:55 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Jan 07 2004 - 16:42:39 CET)
Re: B+ tree implementation
Corey Brown
(Wed Jan 07 2004 - 18:06:01 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
Mike MacSween
(Wed Jan 07 2004 - 22:42:03 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
Roger
(Thu Jan 08 2004 - 00:06:49 CET)
Re: Would you like to get practical experience with a DBMS of a new generation?
Hiran Chaudhuri
(Thu Jan 08 2004 - 01:16:28 CET)
Re: Would you like to get practical experience with a DBMS of a new generation?
Alexander Lashenko
(Thu Jan 08 2004 - 02:04:03 CET)
Re: Would you like to get practical experience with a DBMS of a new generation?
Bob Badour
(Thu Jan 08 2004 - 04:28:19 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Thu Jan 08 2004 - 04:47:37 CET)
Re: Domain
Bob Badour
(Thu Jan 08 2004 - 04:51:50 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Bob Badour
(Thu Jan 08 2004 - 04:53:04 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Bob Badour
(Thu Jan 08 2004 - 04:54:00 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Thu Jan 08 2004 - 05:32:50 CET)
Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS
David Portas
(Thu Jan 08 2004 - 12:06:09 CET)
Re: B+ tree implementation
Paul
(Thu Jan 08 2004 - 16:29:03 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Thu Jan 08 2004 - 17:41:43 CET)
Re: B+ tree implementation
Corey Brown
(Thu Jan 08 2004 - 18:06:51 CET)
Re: Scaled or Granular Dates
--CELKO--
(Thu Jan 08 2004 - 18:33:25 CET)
Re: Scaled or Granular Dates
Jonathan Leffler
(Thu Jan 08 2004 - 19:16:52 CET)
Re: check constraint question - still perplexed
Karel van der Walt
(Thu Jan 08 2004 - 21:23:44 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Thu Jan 08 2004 - 21:23:46 CET)
Re: Scaled or Granular Dates
--CELKO--
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 00:28:57 CET)
Re: Scaled or Granular Dates
Jonathan Leffler
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 01:16:53 CET)
Re: Scaled or Granular Dates
Pat Turner
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 16:47:22 CET)
Re: equivalence of functional dependencies
Adrian Kubala
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 02:46:17 CET)
Re: equivalence of functional dependencies
Jonathan Leffler
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 05:32:45 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Adrian Kubala
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 02:40:37 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Adrian Kubala
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 03:11:04 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Mike Preece
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 04:06:16 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Jonathan Leffler
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 05:39:53 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 06:39:48 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 07:00:07 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Jerome H. Gitomer
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 16:57:49 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 17:16:58 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Bob Badour
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 18:57:28 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Adrian Kubala
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 22:51:51 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 05:14:54 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 06:42:02 CET)
Re: citations of nature
Bob Badour
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 06:43:32 CET)
Re: Codd Interview from -82
Alfredo Novoa
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 13:13:07 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 17:47:34 CET)
Re: Scaled or Granular Dates
Marshall Spight
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 18:05:48 CET)
Re: Scalars & atomic values & variables
Adrian Kubala
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 19:57:57 CET)
Re: Scalars & atomic values & variables
Adrian Kubala
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 19:52:16 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Adrian Kubala
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 19:46:47 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 20:35:48 CET)
Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS
Adrian Kubala
(Fri Jan 09 2004 - 20:17:56 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sat Jan 10 2004 - 04:18:05 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Sat Jan 10 2004 - 06:41:52 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Marshall Spight
(Sat Jan 10 2004 - 20:50:10 CET)
Re: equivalence of functional dependencies
Bert Blink
(Sat Jan 10 2004 - 22:44:08 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Adrian Kubala
(Sat Jan 10 2004 - 23:59:04 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Adrian Kubala
(Sun Jan 11 2004 - 00:25:57 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sun Jan 11 2004 - 01:41:49 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Adrian Kubala
(Sun Jan 11 2004 - 03:30:58 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sun Jan 11 2004 - 04:45:55 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Sun Jan 11 2004 - 06:27:08 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Sun Jan 11 2004 - 08:38:07 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Alfredo Novoa
(Sun Jan 11 2004 - 13:38:36 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Sun Jan 11 2004 - 19:51:27 CET)
Re: What are we asking of a data model?
SPeacock
(Sun Jan 11 2004 - 22:16:56 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Adrian Kubala
(Sun Jan 11 2004 - 23:05:56 CET)
Re: What are we asking of a data model?
Joe \
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 00:16:16 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Adrian Kubala
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 00:18:52 CET)
Re: What are we asking of a data model?
SPeacock
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 01:24:29 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Joe \
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 02:30:19 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 04:06:01 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 07:14:39 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Adrian Kubala
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 07:35:12 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Adrian Kubala
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 08:39:08 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 11:28:56 CET)
Re: Scaled or Granular Dates
Paul Vernon
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 15:29:12 CET)
Re: Relational Database Comparison
wisefool
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 15:55:07 CET)
Re: Relational Database Comparison
Jonathan Leffler
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 09:51:52 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Marshall Spight
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 18:05:22 CET)
Re: Scaled or Granular Dates
Marshall Spight
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 18:22:56 CET)
Re: Scaled or Granular Dates
Marshall Spight
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 18:11:59 CET)
Re: Scaled or Granular Dates
--CELKO--
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 19:45:33 CET)
Re: Scaled or Granular Dates
Christopher Browne
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 21:55:17 CET)
Re: Relational Database Comparison
Bob Badour
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 22:35:33 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 23:03:32 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Bob Badour
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 23:07:33 CET)
Re: What are we asking of a data model?
Bob Badour
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 23:10:07 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Adrian Kubala
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 23:04:04 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Adrian Kubala
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 23:31:31 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Adrian Kubala
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 23:47:56 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Adrian Kubala
(Mon Jan 12 2004 - 23:45:20 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 00:27:09 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 04:34:11 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Marshall Spight
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 06:00:58 CET)
Re: Scaled or Granular Dates
Marshall Spight
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 06:12:29 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Marshall Spight
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 06:30:07 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 06:51:49 CET)
Re: What are we asking of a data model?
SPeacock
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 06:53:23 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 07:13:10 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Adrian Kubala
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 07:32:57 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Adrian Kubala
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 08:05:42 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Adrian Kubala
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 08:09:57 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Adrian Kubala
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 08:47:38 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Adrian Kubala
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 08:56:12 CET)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley?
Mike Sherrill
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 13:26:24 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 15:13:24 CET)
Re: What are we asking of a data model?
Tom Hester
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 17:46:55 CET)
Re: What are we asking of a data model?
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 18:52:41 CET)
Re: Relational Database Comparison
wisefool
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 20:22:42 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Adrian Kubala
(Tue Jan 13 2004 - 21:25:20 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Jan 14 2004 - 01:03:23 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Jan 14 2004 - 05:06:25 CET)
Re: Codd Interview from -82
Mark Johnson
(Wed Jan 14 2004 - 04:43:03 CET)
Re: Codd Interview from -82
Lauri Pietarinen
(Thu Jan 15 2004 - 08:39:36 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Wed Jan 14 2004 - 07:11:20 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Adrian Kubala
(Wed Jan 14 2004 - 07:53:33 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Adrian Kubala
(Wed Jan 14 2004 - 09:17:56 CET)
Re: Data validation
Paul Vernon
(Wed Jan 14 2004 - 11:52:21 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Jan 14 2004 - 18:42:48 CET)
Re: Data validation
Paul G. Brown
(Wed Jan 14 2004 - 22:01:33 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Adrian Kubala
(Thu Jan 15 2004 - 00:36:40 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Thu Jan 15 2004 - 01:14:12 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Bob Badour
(Thu Jan 15 2004 - 03:09:53 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Adrian Kubala
(Thu Jan 15 2004 - 02:41:49 CET)
Re: Stored fields ordered left to right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Thu Jan 15 2004 - 03:24:24 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Thu Jan 15 2004 - 04:43:47 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Joe \
(Thu Jan 15 2004 - 05:47:25 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Adrian Kubala
(Thu Jan 15 2004 - 07:44:02 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Costin Cozianu
(Thu Jan 15 2004 - 22:52:45 CET)
Re: Special query type for Spatial DB
mountain man
(Fri Jan 16 2004 - 00:58:21 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Fri Jan 16 2004 - 05:04:39 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Marshall Spight
(Fri Jan 16 2004 - 05:11:18 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Bob Badour
(Fri Jan 16 2004 - 06:18:05 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Adrian Kubala
(Fri Jan 16 2004 - 06:21:30 CET)
Re: Special query type for Spatial DB
Paul
(Fri Jan 16 2004 - 08:06:03 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
Marshall Spight
(Fri Jan 16 2004 - 08:32:41 CET)
Re: Special query type for Spatial DB
Peter Koch Larsen
(Fri Jan 16 2004 - 11:04:21 CET)
Re: Special query type for Spatial DB
mountain man
(Fri Jan 16 2004 - 13:03:54 CET)
Re: Special query type for Spatial DB
Paul
(Fri Jan 16 2004 - 17:24:17 CET)
Re: Special query type for Spatial DB
Paul
(Fri Jan 16 2004 - 17:27:58 CET)
Re: Special query type for Spatial DB
Paul
(Fri Jan 16 2004 - 17:36:09 CET)
Re: Special query type for Spatial DB
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Jan 16 2004 - 17:41:59 CET)
Re: Special query type for Spatial DB
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Jan 16 2004 - 18:03:13 CET)
Re: What are we asking of a data model?
Neo
(Sat Jan 17 2004 - 02:50:57 CET)
Re: Database problem?
Bob Badour
(Sun Jan 18 2004 - 00:52:30 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
HungryLion
(Sun Jan 18 2004 - 04:53:25 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Paul G. Brown
(Sun Jan 18 2004 - 07:27:44 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Peter Koch Larsen
(Sun Jan 18 2004 - 12:49:07 CET)
Re: Special query type for Spatial DB
mountain man
(Sun Jan 18 2004 - 13:16:41 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Alfredo Novoa
(Sun Jan 18 2004 - 14:40:14 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Bob Badour
(Sun Jan 18 2004 - 16:19:43 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Marshall Spight
(Mon Jan 19 2004 - 01:16:31 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Marshall Spight
(Mon Jan 19 2004 - 01:18:46 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Bob Badour
(Mon Jan 19 2004 - 01:29:51 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Marshall Spight
(Mon Jan 19 2004 - 03:42:20 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Marshall Spight
(Mon Jan 19 2004 - 04:02:56 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Christopher Browne
(Mon Jan 19 2004 - 06:15:20 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Marshall Spight
(Mon Jan 19 2004 - 07:09:34 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon Jan 19 2004 - 08:43:21 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Roy Hann
(Mon Jan 19 2004 - 08:49:04 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Mon Jan 19 2004 - 17:59:48 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Mon Jan 19 2004 - 18:24:38 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Paul G. Brown
(Mon Jan 19 2004 - 18:41:16 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Paul Vernon
(Mon Jan 19 2004 - 19:23:23 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Costin Cozianu
(Mon Jan 19 2004 - 20:41:38 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Marshall Spight
(Mon Jan 19 2004 - 21:03:39 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Marshall Spight
(Mon Jan 19 2004 - 22:04:32 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Costin Cozianu
(Mon Jan 19 2004 - 22:29:26 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
SPeacock
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 01:24:44 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Bob Badour
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 01:31:53 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
daveb
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 01:34:44 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Bob Badour
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 01:37:58 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Marshall Spight
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 03:40:14 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Marshall Spight
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 03:49:49 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Bob Badour
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 03:58:13 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Paul G. Brown
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 04:01:25 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Paul G. Brown
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 04:06:13 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Christopher Browne
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 04:36:15 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Marshall Spight
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 04:40:07 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Marshall Spight
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 04:42:37 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Bob Badour
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 05:10:50 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Bob Badour
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 05:17:22 CET)
Re: ER diagram question
Dataman
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 05:18:08 CET)
Re: Inheritance mapping in a RDBMS
Lennart Jonsson
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 06:30:04 CET)
Re: Inheritance mapping in a RDBMS
Adrian Kubala
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 06:54:57 CET)
Re: Inheritance mapping in a RDBMS
Jonathan Leffler
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 07:45:38 CET)
Re: ER diagram question
Jonck van der Kogel
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 11:42:33 CET)
Re: ER diagram question
Bernard Peek
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 14:32:08 CET)
Re: Inheritance mapping in a RDBMS
Maarten van der Peet
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 15:00:00 CET)
Re: ER diagram question
Dataman
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 15:00:37 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
TenKMan
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 16:04:02 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Mike Sherrill
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 17:59:19 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Bob Badour
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 19:30:40 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Paul Vernon
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 21:08:38 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Paul Vernon
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 21:14:58 CET)
Re: ER diagram question
Jonck van der Kogel
(Tue Jan 20 2004 - 22:28:47 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
TenKMan
(Wed Jan 21 2004 - 01:37:02 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Bob Badour
(Wed Jan 21 2004 - 01:40:52 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
TenKMan
(Wed Jan 21 2004 - 01:50:07 CET)
Re: A tree with 1M nodes
--CELKO--
(Wed Jan 21 2004 - 01:55:33 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Bob Badour
(Wed Jan 21 2004 - 02:13:36 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
TenKMan
(Wed Jan 21 2004 - 04:24:54 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Bob Badour
(Wed Jan 21 2004 - 06:06:25 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Mike Sherrill
(Wed Jan 21 2004 - 12:58:40 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Jan 21 2004 - 15:28:53 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Roy Hann
(Wed Jan 21 2004 - 15:30:28 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
TenKMan
(Wed Jan 21 2004 - 15:37:25 CET)
Re: ER diagram question
Dataman
(Wed Jan 21 2004 - 18:31:13 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Dataman
(Wed Jan 21 2004 - 18:33:12 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Dataman
(Wed Jan 21 2004 - 18:35:35 CET)
Re: Hierachical structures - an overview
David Morse
(Wed Jan 21 2004 - 19:42:58 CET)
Re: Hierachical structures - an overview
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Jan 21 2004 - 20:15:38 CET)
Re: Hierachical structures - an overview
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu Jan 22 2004 - 03:32:11 CET)
Re: Hierachical structures - an overview
Serge Rielau
(Thu Jan 22 2004 - 15:54:57 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Bob Badour
(Wed Jan 21 2004 - 22:30:46 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Paul G. Brown
(Thu Jan 22 2004 - 04:36:40 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Joe \
(Thu Jan 22 2004 - 08:26:27 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Paul
(Thu Jan 22 2004 - 14:48:07 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Joe \
(Thu Jan 22 2004 - 16:15:32 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Dataman
(Thu Jan 22 2004 - 17:18:17 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Anton Versteeg
(Thu Jan 22 2004 - 17:29:52 CET)
Re: Column naming convention origin?
Anton Versteeg
(Thu Jan 22 2004 - 18:08:00 CET)
Re: A tree with 1M nodes
Ernst-Udo Wallenborn
(Thu Jan 22 2004 - 18:26:11 CET)
Re: A tree with 1M nodes
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu Jan 22 2004 - 18:49:05 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Paul G. Brown
(Thu Jan 22 2004 - 19:19:14 CET)
Re: Column naming convention origin?
Bob Badour
(Thu Jan 22 2004 - 21:48:38 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Paul
(Thu Jan 22 2004 - 22:05:19 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Paul G. Brown
(Thu Jan 22 2004 - 23:24:07 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Christopher Browne
(Fri Jan 23 2004 - 05:04:25 CET)
Re: Tables and data question
Bernard Peek
(Fri Jan 23 2004 - 11:04:50 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Dataman
(Fri Jan 23 2004 - 15:01:34 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Fri Jan 23 2004 - 19:20:42 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
TenKMan
(Sat Jan 24 2004 - 01:40:19 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Sat Jan 24 2004 - 03:45:18 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Bob Badour
(Sat Jan 24 2004 - 05:16:45 CET)
Re: ER diagram question
Peter Mount
(Sat Jan 24 2004 - 11:51:20 CET)
Re: baseball league db design
Karel Miklav
(Sat Jan 24 2004 - 12:01:33 CET)
Re: baseball league db design
John O'Conner
(Sun Jan 25 2004 - 09:51:09 CET)
Re: Table design question
Karel Miklav
(Sat Jan 24 2004 - 12:19:45 CET)
Re: Table design question
Karel Miklav
(Sat Jan 24 2004 - 12:44:30 CET)
Re: Table design question
Mike Sherrill
(Sat Jan 24 2004 - 14:05:02 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
TenKMan
(Sat Jan 24 2004 - 17:14:17 CET)
Re: baseball league db design
Nelson Ricardo
(Sat Jan 24 2004 - 17:38:20 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Bob Badour
(Sat Jan 24 2004 - 17:40:00 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Marshall Spight
(Sat Jan 24 2004 - 18:15:00 CET)
Re: Special Query Type for Spatial-DB
Joe \
(Sat Jan 24 2004 - 18:01:20 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
HungryLion
(Sat Jan 24 2004 - 20:34:04 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Bob Badour
(Sat Jan 24 2004 - 21:45:02 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
TenKMan
(Sat Jan 24 2004 - 21:55:17 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Bob Badour
(Sun Jan 25 2004 - 04:43:41 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
TenKMan
(Sun Jan 25 2004 - 05:39:47 CET)
Re: Table design question
Tony
(Sun Jan 25 2004 - 12:39:33 CET)
Re: ER diagram question
Jonck van der Kogel
(Sun Jan 25 2004 - 14:41:07 CET)
Re: baseball league db design
Bob Badour
(Sun Jan 25 2004 - 16:28:06 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Bob Badour
(Sun Jan 25 2004 - 17:18:00 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
Paul G. Brown
(Sun Jan 25 2004 - 20:38:48 CET)
Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
TenKMan
(Sun Jan 25 2004 - 21:52:26 CET)
Re: baseball league db design
Dataman
(Sun Jan 25 2004 - 23:24:56 CET)
Re: Entity data spread over multiple tables
--CELKO--
(Mon Jan 26 2004 - 04:40:24 CET)
Re: baseball league db design
John O'Conner
(Mon Jan 26 2004 - 20:02:56 CET)
Re: baseball league db design
Bob Badour
(Mon Jan 26 2004 - 21:25:32 CET)
Re: insert different from union?
Bob Badour
(Tue Jan 27 2004 - 00:01:35 CET)
Re: insert different from union?
Jonathan Leffler
(Tue Jan 27 2004 - 08:51:05 CET)
Re: insert different from union?
Bob Badour
(Tue Jan 27 2004 - 15:06:04 CET)
Re: insert different from union?
Paul Vernon
(Tue Jan 27 2004 - 13:48:29 CET)
Re: insert different from union?
Paul Vernon
(Tue Jan 27 2004 - 14:14:27 CET)
Re: insert different from union?
Bob Badour
(Tue Jan 27 2004 - 16:28:41 CET)
Re: Entity data spread over multiple tables
James
(Tue Jan 27 2004 - 17:24:57 CET)
Re: insert different from union?
Paul Vernon
(Tue Jan 27 2004 - 18:29:17 CET)
Re: insert different from union?
Bob Badour
(Tue Jan 27 2004 - 19:23:59 CET)
Re: Special query type for Spatial DB
Arthur Yeo
(Tue Jan 27 2004 - 19:32:49 CET)
Re: Special query type for Spatial DB
Arthur Yeo
(Tue Jan 27 2004 - 19:51:53 CET)
Re: Special query type for Spatial DB
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Jan 27 2004 - 21:20:52 CET)
Re: insert different from union?
Paul Vernon
(Tue Jan 27 2004 - 21:16:54 CET)
Re: RHF und UHF
Peter
(Wed Jan 28 2004 - 11:30:21 CET)
Re: baseball league db design
Neo
(Thu Jan 29 2004 - 00:36:11 CET)
Re: Special query type for Spatial DB
Arthur Yeo
(Thu Jan 29 2004 - 00:43:57 CET)
Re: Special query type for Spatial DB
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Jan 29 2004 - 02:53:27 CET)
Re: Special query type for Spatial DB
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Jan 29 2004 - 03:04:48 CET)
Re: Table design question
Mike Sherrill
(Fri Jan 30 2004 - 14:33:54 CET)
Re: Table design question
Bob Badour
(Fri Jan 30 2004 - 18:46:56 CET)
Re: Table design question
Tony
(Fri Jan 30 2004 - 21:30:55 CET)
Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS
David Portas
(Thu Jan 01 2004 - 22:48:24 CET)
Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS
Joe \
(Thu Jan 01 2004 - 22:55:32 CET)
Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS
abombss
(Thu Jan 01 2004 - 23:06:32 CET)
Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS
David Portas
(Thu Jan 01 2004 - 23:14:11 CET)
Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS
abombss
(Thu Jan 01 2004 - 23:22:40 CET)
Re: Unique Constraint with Multiple NULLS
abombss
(Thu Jan 01 2004 - 23:37:22 CET)
Re: relations aren't types?
John Jacob
(Thu Jan 01 2004 - 22:58:05 CET)
Last message date
:
Thu Jan 01 2004 - 23:37:22 CET
Archived on
: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 12:02:12 CEST
9 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
.::
Blogger Home
::
Wiki Home
::
Forum Home
::
Privacy
::
Contact
::.